Profile of Marklar in ApeCoin

Posts by Marklar

• AIP Potential Proposal: Building a Video Game Publisher in Ape Coin DAO. Thoughts? by Marklar - No Role
  Posted on: June 15, 2023, 6:05 p.m.
  Content: Sasha: nd it can become web 3 influencers-owned publisher please, no. web 3 influencer clout is not a meaningful sales pitch in this context. and it’s counter-productive to $ape’s web 3 taint. that said, brycent is doing a decent job of breaking the mold: what does him ‘joining’ look like to you and what role would he serve? apart from signaling support, would direct involvement be best left until content is ready to be distributed? at which point, we might have more clarity on productive distribution channels?
  Likes: 0 Replies: 1
  No likes yet.
  Replies:

  • Sasha: Marklar: what does him ‘joining’ look like to you and what role would he serve? Great questions. Just look up the example I provided, Mad Mushroom by OTK. You absolutely need more than influencers on the team (and honestly I should have used the term “content creators”), but the main job of any publisher is to market the product. This is not old days when you had to take care of distribution of CDs/DVDs, too - Steam, Epic store, and others take care of that. Today, 99% of the job is visibility. Everything else is irrelevant without it. And some content creators are very smart and business-savvy. They’re not just good on camera. I think Brycent is one of those. So, imho, the model of Mad Mushroom is super-smart because it cuts on the biggest expense a publishing company would have, which is marketing. You just make smart influencers co-owners and then market through their channels/streams. They also are great beta-testers to select games, as they are real gamers, so this avoids hopefully publisher investing in rugs.
• Legal Defense Fund by Marklar - No Role
  Posted on: March 21, 2023, 2:55 p.m.
  Content: Suggested this in other channels and forums, but it’s time for those with a large vested interest to consider this type of proposal. SushiSwap – 21 Mar 23 Establish Sushi Legal Defense Fund Proposals Establish Sushi DAO Legal Defense Fund Goal Establish a legal defense fund to cover legal costs for core contributors. Summary The international regulatory environment for DAOs remains in flux, and the options for contributor insurance policies... Reading time: 1 mins ? Likes: 4 ❤
  Likes: 7 Replies: 0
  Likers: Amplify, ssp1111, adventurousape, Mantis, Abr123, Cardo, Ms_NFTy
  No replies yet.
• AIP-228: $APE for Bored Ape Yacht Club Discord ‘Club Mods’ by Marklar - No Role
  Posted on: March 9, 2023, 11:40 a.m.
  Content: Unpaid mods should not be a thing. However, this feels like a Yuga issue moreso than a DAO issue.
  Likes: 7 Replies: 2
  Likers: br00no, 0xK, Cardo, Abr123, Sasha, capetaintrippy, TheFatherOfAllStorms
  Replies:

  • camol: I agree - and hopefully this can be the catalyst for change. As the DAO is a part of the ‘Yuga Ecosystem’ we can do our best to step-up when needed.
  • Hangout: I agree, tbh between ApeCoin DAO Discourse and Discord I rarely go into the BAYC discord. Not to disparage it, but not seeing it as a ApeCoin DAO responsibility area. I do agree mods should be paid, but seems logical in this case it should be yuga paying.
• Special Council Applicants: Participation Details by Marklar - No Role
  Posted on: Nov. 23, 2022, 9:25 a.m.
  Content: Great work, ser. Might dig one layer deep on some of the lower counts.
  Likes: 2 Replies: 0
  Likers: Abr123, Moonlyght
  No replies yet.
• Special Council Applicants: Participation Details by Marklar - No Role
  Posted on: Nov. 22, 2022, 12:03 p.m.
  Content: Precisely my dear Watson.
  Likes: 5 Replies: 0
  Likers: Moonlyght, MBF.eth, AaronLeupp.eth, Abr123, bigbull
  No replies yet.
• Special Council Applicants: Participation Details by Marklar - No Role
  Posted on: Nov. 21, 2022, 1:39 p.m.
  Content: Dear Special Council candidates: Please provide the following: Forum name and badges earned. Proof of snapshot voting history unless you (understandably) prefer to remain anon. If you have an ape pfp but lack DAO participation, explain your motivations to get involved now. Thank you.
  Likes: 8 Replies: 0
  Likers: Abr123, Moonlyght, MBF.eth, NFTxExplore, adventurousape, badteeth, 0xPlasma.eth, bigbull
  No replies yet.
• Brainstorming - How would you attract new users and their participation in the DAO? by Marklar - No Role
  Posted on: Nov. 3, 2022, 4:18 p.m.
  Content: As suggested in AIP- 118 , ApeCoin DAO owns a marketplace and pays marketplace fees to $ape stakers. $APE utility. Although outside the scope of this proposal, ApeCoin DAO should consider an $APE staking module that remits finder’s fees directly to stakers (potentially acting as membership to a marketplace subDAO / working group).
  Likes: 0 Replies: 0
  No likes yet.
  No replies yet.
• Should we ask Cartan Group to scope setting up the DAO to accept funds? by Marklar - No Role
  Posted on: Nov. 3, 2022, 4:07 p.m.
  Content: Yes, this is critical infrastructure that is needed to mitigate risks to DAO and participants that also drives a utility feedback loop.
  Likes: 7 Replies: 0
  Likers: 12GAUGE, Lost, Amplify, Mantis, adventurousape, zheerwagen, Abr123
  No replies yet.
• AIP-121: Transparency Act for Ecosystem Fund Allocation by Marklar - No Role
  Posted on: Oct. 1, 2022, 9:10 p.m.
  Content: Yeah, Special Council should lead the way. @Novocrypto read this after and concur. For me, there’s also something to self-disclosure without compulsion that at least gives me implicit trust. My general fear is a lot of NFT natives missed DeFi summer and as these worlds collides we’re starting the trusted v trustless learning curve all over again. If your proposal only goes so far as ‘trust me’, then hopefully there’s enough folks to call that out during draft. But Yeesh participation and infra for a $ 5 B FDV DAO is bad right now. So much capital to push the space forward. But lots to learn still.
  Likes: 5 Replies: 0
  Likers: Halina.eth, Amplify, Novocrypto, adventurousape, Abr123
  No replies yet.
• AIP-121: Transparency Act for Ecosystem Fund Allocation by Marklar - No Role
  Posted on: Oct. 1, 2022, 9:02 p.m.
  Content: This is a tough question. I’d generally say Special Council as, imo, they have the largest personal risks attributable to DAO activity and have the best grasp on subjective materiality. I think I’ve derived KYC happens and that alleviates a tremendous amount of concern for me, at least in terms of direct funding. But there’s nothing stated anywhere that confirms this. Stack on the power of float as free capital, and KYC is an unknown that may not cover all the scenarios it should.
  Likes: 5 Replies: 0
  Likers: Amplify, Novocrypto, adventurousape, Abr123, bigbull
  No replies yet.