Profile of Uzi in ApeCoin

Posts by Uzi

• Memecoin for $APE Holders on Solana by Uzi - No Role
  Posted on: March 15, 2024, 7:58 p.m.
  Content: PROPOSAL NAME: Memecoin for $APE Holders on Solana PROPOSAL CATEGORY: Ecosystem Fund Allocation TEAM DESCRIPTION: This proposal is put forward by Uzi who passionate about fostering a sense of fun and unity within the community. The team is yet to be put together, and will be completed as part of this AIP idea process. ABSTRACT: Proposing the creation of a fun MemeCoin to be distributed proportionally to APE token holders. This token is intended to strengthen community engagement, bringing a lighter and enjoyable aspect to the ApeCoin ecosystem. Solana has been chosen as Uzi beleives that this is the right blockchain to launch a memecoin on. BENEFIT TO APECOIN ECOSYSTEM: This initiative aims to increase community interaction and enjoyment among APE holders, enhancing the sense of belonging and camaraderie within the ApeCoin ecosystem. KEY TERMS: NA PLATFORMS & TECHNOLOGIES: The Memecoin will be developed and distributed on the Solana blockchain. STEPS TO IMPLEMENT & TIMELINE: TBC OVERALL COST: TBC
  Likes: 0 Replies: 0
  No likes yet.
  No replies yet.
• Ensuring Impartiality and Integrity: Conflict of Interest Policy for SC Members in ApeCoin DAO by Uzi - No Role
  Posted on: Dec. 17, 2023, 4:26 p.m.
  Content: Hello thanks, let’s move to draft please.
  Likes: 2 Replies: 0
  Likers: Chris.Admin, furiousanger
  No replies yet.
• Ensuring Impartiality and Integrity: Conflict of Interest Policy for SC Members in ApeCoin DAO by Uzi - No Role
  Posted on: Dec. 17, 2023, 4:25 p.m.
  Content: Thank you for all your feedback. I plan to move to draft and consider your points in the update. Just for info: Special Council have confirmed that there is a Conflict of Interest Policy for SC (I am not permitted to see it at the moment). The current policy permits dual roles for SC. That is, it allows a SC member to be a beneficiary of the DAO for an AIP as long as they recuse themsleves from all matters relating to it. The view is that it is a DAO decision on whether to approve/reject the AIP. I plan to knit this into the AIP and to be clear that the policy that will result from this AIP will become an addendum to the current COI policy and that if there is any conflict, this AIP policy addendum will take precedence. I also plan to make it clear that SC can not initiate or implement into a proposal that falls into the “Brand Decision” category and only initiate a proposal for a “Relocation of Ecosystem Funds”. I think that it is important that SC are still able to initiate and implement AIPs for the other AIP types during this transition phase of the SC role. I trust that this all makes sense. Please feel free to ask any questions.
  Likes: 1 Replies: 0
  Likers: furiousanger
  No replies yet.
• Optimizing ApeChain Voting: Prohibiting a RFP and Coordinating Multiple Proposals Voting by Uzi - No Role
  Posted on: Dec. 15, 2023, 12:03 a.m.
  Content: AIP TITLE: Optimizing ApeChain Voting: Prohibiting a RFP and Coordinating Multiple Proposals Voting AIP CATEGORY: Process TEAM/AUTHOR: Name: Uzair Osman, also known as Uzi, is a seasoned corporate leader with a notable track record as a Managing Director and Non-Executive Director. His extensive experience in overseeing business operations and strategic planning is complemented by his accreditations as a Project Management Professional (PMP®) and a Chartered Surveyor (MRICS). Uzi’s expertise spans across strategic procurement, project management, and corporate governance, demonstrating a profound understanding of both the operational and strategic facets of business leadership. In the realm of blockchain and decentralized technologies, he brings a unique blend of corporate acumen and strategic insight, particularly valuable for guiding projects like ApeChain within the ApeCoin DAO. ABSTRACT: This AIP proposes a novel approach for ApeChain development by prohibiting the use of a traditional Request for Proposal (RFP) process and instead coordinating a consolidated voting period for multiple existing ApeChain proposals. This method aims to streamline decision-making and enhance community involvement. The simultaneous voting, scheduled for a two-week period at the end of January 2024 , is designed to expedite decision-making and maximize community participation in this pivotal development phase. RATIONALE: The ApeCoin DAO is currently considering multiple proposals for the ApeChain project, indicating a healthy interest and diverse innovation. A traditional RFP process, in this context, may lead to delays and limit the community’s involvement in the decision-making process. Instead, by facilitating the normal AIP process for these proposals and scheduling concurrent voting, the DAO can efficiently evaluate and choose the most favorable direction for ApeChain. This approach aligns with the ethos of DAOs, focusing on community-driven selection and decentralized decision-making. SPECIFICATIONS: Prohibition of a RFP Process: Temporarily suspend the use of RFP for ApeChain to avoid potential delays and embrace a more inclusive, community-centric approach. Normal AIP Process for Current Proposals: Process all current ApeChain proposals through the standard AIP system, allowing each to be evaluated on its own merits and in alignment with community values. Coordinated Voting Schedule: Organize a two-week voting period at the end of January 2024 for all ApeChain proposals, facilitating a focused and decisive community vote. BENEFIT TO THE APECOIN ECOSYSTEM: Efficient Decision-Making: Streamlines the decision-making process, enabling quicker and more effective choices for ApeChain’s future. Increased Community Participation: Fosters greater community engagement and democratic participation in a crucial decision, ensuring diverse input and perspectives. Clarity and Direction: Provides clear direction for ApeChain development, aligning with community preferences and strategic objectives. STEPS FOR IMPLEMENTATION: Community Communication: Inform the community about this AIP, its rationale, and the benefits of a decentralized decision-making process. Voting Arrangements: Organize the logistics for the simultaneous voting process, ensuring transparency and accessibility. Conduct of Voting: Execute the voting period as planned, emphasizing an inclusive and transparent process. Analysis of Results: Analyze the outcomes and prepare for subsequent steps based on the community’s choice. TIMELINE: Estimated Completion: End of voting period in January 2024 . BUDGET & FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Estimated Cost: [To be determined] Funding Source: [To be identified]
  Likes: 0 Replies: 0
  No likes yet.
  No replies yet.
• Ensuring Impartiality and Integrity: Conflict of Interest Policy for SC Members in ApeCoin DAO by Uzi - No Role
  Posted on: Dec. 11, 2023, 3:35 p.m.
  Content: AIP TITLE: Ensuring Impartiality and Integrity: Conflict of Interest Policy for SC Members in ApeCoin DAO AIP CATEGORY: Process TEAM/AUTHOR: Name: Uzair Osman PMP® MRICS (Uzi) - Uzi is a seasoned Corporate Director and Consults on Professional Ethics, and is accredited as a Project Management Professional (PMP®) and a Chartered Surveyor (MRICS) bound by strict professional ethics.He is recognized for his strong commitment to ethical conduct in business and governance, bringing these principles to the forefront in the decentralized Web 3 space. ABSTRACT: This Ape Improvement Proposal (AIP) introduces a policy with tailored guidelines for the involvement of Special Council (SC) members in the initiation and implementation of various proposal types within the ApeCoin DAO. It aims to delineate clear and ethical roles for SC members in “Brand Decision,” “Ecosystem Fund Allocation,” “Informational,” and “Process” proposals, with an emphasis on preventing conflicts of interest and maintaining the integrity of the DAO’s decision-making processes. RATIONALE: The rationale for this proposal stems from the need to balance the valuable insights and leadership roles of SC members with the imperative to uphold governance integrity and prevent conflicts of interest within the ApeCoin DAO. Recognizing the distinct nature of different proposal types, this policy sets specific guidelines for SC member involvement: In “Brand Decision” proposals, there is a higher risk of conflict of interest due to potential personal gains. Therefore, while SC members may initiate such proposals, their direct implementation role should be limited. “Ecosystem Fund Allocation” proposals benefit from SC members’ strategic insights. Here, SC members are encouraged to initiate proposals but should maintain an oversight role in implementation to avoid direct financial conflicts. “Informational” and “Process” proposals, typically less prone to conflicts of interest, are suitable for both initiation and implementation by SC members, given their nature and impact on the DAO’s operations. TERMS/SPECIFICATIONS: 1 . General Conflict of Interest Definition: Define what a conflict of interest may include any situation where SC members have personal interests that could improperly influence their decisions or actions within the DAO. 2 . Proposal Type-Specific Guidelines: Brand Decision Proposals: Initiaition: SC members can initiate these proposals, but must exercise caution and fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest. Implementation: SC members should generally not be involved in the direct implementation to avoid conflicts of interest, especially where there could be financial or reputational gains. Ecosystem Fund Allocation Proposals: Initiation: SC members are encouraged to initiate these proposals given their strategic insight into the DAO’s financial needs. Implementation: Involvement in implementation should be primarily in an oversight role. Direct control or benefit from fund allocation should be avoided to maintain impartiality. Informational Proposals: Initiation and Implementation: SC members are well-suited to both initiate and implement these proposals, as they typically involve sharing information or suggesting changes to guidelines, posing minimal conflict of interest risks. Process Proposals: Initiation: SC members can initiate these proposals, leveraging their understanding of the DAO’s processes. Implementation: SC members should limit their involvement to oversight roles to ensure fairness and neutrality in the implementation of process changes. 3 . Disclosure and Recusal Protocols: Require SC members to disclose any potential conflicts of interest in any proposal they are involved with. Establish clear recusal protocols for SC members from decision-making in proposals where they have a personal interest. 4 . Oversight and Compliance: Set up a monitoring mechanism to oversee SC members’ adherence to these guidelines. Ensure transparency in all stages of the proposal process, from initiation to implementation. BENEFIT TO THE APECOIN ECOSYSTEM: Enhanced Trust and Governance Integrity: By preventing potential conflicts of interest, this policy will reinforce community trust in the ApeCoin DAO’s decision-making and enhance the overall integrity of the DAO’s governance processes. Focused Stewardship: Restricting SC members from being involved in the implementation of proposals allows them to dedicate their full attention and resources to their primary role as stewards of the DAO. This focused approach ensures that the SC can provide more effective oversight and strategic guidance, essential for the DAO’s success. Optimized Operational Efficiency: By delineating the roles of SC members and implementers, this policy encourages the involvement of individuals or teams specifically skilled in executing proposals. This separation of governance and execution roles allows for a more efficient allocation of tasks, where those best suited for implementation can focus on creating value for the DAO without governance-related distractions. Positive Reputation and Leadership in Ethical Practices: The adoption of this policy positions the ApeCoin DAO as a leader in ethical governance practices within Web 3 . 0 and DAO communities, setting a precedent for transparency and operational excellence. STEPS FOR IMPLEMENTATION: Policy Development: Collaborate with legal and governance experts to draft the policy. Community Feedback: Open the policy draft for community review and suggestions. Revision and Finalization: Incorporate community feedback and finalize the policy. Implementation and Training: Officially adopt the policy and provide training to SC members. Monitoring and Enforcement: Establish a system to monitor compliance and address any violations. Timescales for each step are to be confirmed. TIMELINE: Total Estimated Time for Completion: To be confirmed BUDGET & FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Estimated Cost: To be confirmed Funding Source: To be confirmed
  Likes: 0 Replies: 0
  No likes yet.
  No replies yet.
• @Uzi - Special Council Nomination 01/2024 by Uzi - No Role
  Posted on: Nov. 28, 2023, 10:12 a.m.
  Content: Hi Fox, Here we go and sorry for the delay: Passionate Objective: I’m really passionate about streamlining DAO processes, particularly in expediting grant agreements. I propose initiating contract discussions during Phase Six (Admin Review) to ensure grant agreements are finalised within two weeks, significantly accelerating project implementation and enhancing ApeCoin’s value. Area of Expertise: My expertise spans being a Managing Director and Executive Board Member in a billion-pound business, a Non-Executive Director & Art Gallery Owner, a consultant, and a Chartered Project Manager and Surveyor. I bring a wealth of Web 2 . 0 experience to ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of Web 3 . 0 initiatives, combining traditional business acumen with my degen spirit of Web 3 . 0 . Time Commitment: As a Managing Director, my role is flexible andoccupies about three days a week, supplemented by 1 -day-a-month commitment as a Non-Exec Director and Co-Founder of an Art Gallery. My consultancy is largely managed by my team, requiring about a day a month from me as well. Therefore, I am fully prepared to dedicate the necessary time to the DAO without any hindrances. DAO’s Current State Concern: My primary concern with our DAO is the extended duration from proposal submission to project implementation. I intend to focus on streamlining this process, ensuring quicker and “proper” execution of projects to deliver value to ApeCoin. Voting Dynamics: The influence of large wallets is a nuanced issue. I advocate for a system where delegated wallets operate like mini DAOs, aggregating individual votes within their communities for fairness. However, I also recognise the weight of substantial investments in ApeCoin and believe in respecting the voting power that comes with substantial financial commitment. Continued Participation: Absolutely, my involvement in the DAO goes beyond holding a position. I am committed to proposing a strategic AIP to ensure the correct implementation of proposals, contributing ideas, and supporting the community’s goals, regardless of the election outcome.
  Likes: 3 Replies: 0
  Likers: AllCityBAYC, foxSlightly, Harata
  No replies yet.
• @Uzi - Special Council Nomination 01/2024 by Uzi - No Role
  Posted on: Nov. 27, 2023, 8:32 a.m.
  Content: Hi @foxSlightly, Sorry I was away yesterday and will respond to this today. Thank you for your questions - I think that they are very well thought-out. Best, Uzi
  Likes: 1 Replies: 0
  Likers: Harata
  No replies yet.
• @Uzi - Special Council Nomination 01/2024 by Uzi - No Role
  Posted on: Nov. 23, 2023, 1:40 p.m.
  Content: Hello all, I hope that you are all well and in good health. Here is a summary of application: Twitter Post Feel free to ask me any questions that you may have. Best, Uzi
  Likes: 1 Replies: 0
  Likers: furiousanger
  No replies yet.