Profile of writersclub33 in ApeCoin

Posts by writersclub33

• Halt Changes To Core Process & Voting Mechanics for One Year by writersclub33 - No Role
  Posted on: June 24, 2023, 7:50 p.m.
  Content: @ 12 GAUGE.Admin Our club has voted 2 - 2 to withdraw this proposal at this time. @br 00 o @bigbull there are more proposals that may further destablize the system. We have decided to remove this proposal. Newly-elected SC & Stewards are best for tackling these larger issues.
  Likes: 1 Replies: 0
  Likers: bigbull
  No replies yet.
• Halt Changes To Core Process & Voting Mechanics for One Year by writersclub33 - No Role
  Posted on: June 17, 2023, 6:01 p.m.
  Content: Hello @ 12 guage. Our club has voted 4 - 0 to extend this conversation for an additional 7 days. We are interested in collecting feedback on how to soften the language.
  Likes: 0 Replies: 0
  No likes yet.
  No replies yet.
• Halt Changes To Core Process & Voting Mechanics for One Year by writersclub33 - No Role
  Posted on: June 10, 2023, 9:36 p.m.
  Content: Our decentralized club does not offer opinions. We have voted 3 - 1 in favor of posting this proposal.
  Likes: 1 Replies: 0
  Likers: Brandonb91002
  No replies yet.
• Halt Changes To Core Process & Voting Mechanics for One Year by writersclub33 - No Role
  Posted on: June 10, 2023, 8:31 p.m.
  Content: “Halt Changes To Core Process & Voting Mechanics for One Year” Abstract This proposal is an informational indication that the ApeCoin DAO token holders will refrain from implementing changes to the core processes or voting mechanics for the duration of one year. Rather than establishing hard rules, this proposition acts as a cautionary statement against potential risks associated with changes advocated by individuals frustrated with or possessing limited understanding of the principles of a truly decentralized organization. Motivation The catalyst for this proposal is the rising inclination among certain DAO participants towards changing the voting process, particularly favoring quadratic voting. By advising against incendiary topics or emotionally charged conversations, this proposal promotes stability and advocates for proposals that align with the collective interests of the DAO. It underscores the importance of researching the snapshot voting history and engaging with experienced individuals or new entities like the Ape Assembly before putting forward a proposal. Rationale The proposal’s justification lies in the belief that DAO’s democratic structure, where each voter has distinct interests and reasons for participation, should not be hastily modified. Changes such as implementing 2 / 3 majorities or quadratic voting, altering AIP- 1 , or mandating terms on new participants like milestone funding or redirection to a working group or proposed small grant program, may not necessarily enhance the organization’s functionality. This proposal seeks to foster stability and discourage contentious discussions like vote shaming or negative sentiment against large delegates and voters. Specifications The specifications of this proposal recommend a complete halt on major changes to ApeCoin DAO’s core processes and voting mechanics for one year. The implementation of this proposal doesn’t entail introducing new rules but rather creating an environment that dissuades alterations that might disrupt the established order. Timeline Upon reaching consensus, this proposal will be put into effect immediately, halting all major changes to the core processes and voting mechanics for a period of one year. Following this term, an evaluation and reconsideration of any possible changes can be carried out based on a more informed and comprehensive understanding of the organization. Overall Cost This proposal doesn’t directly involve any financial expenditure as it calls for preserving the current system rather than implementing new features or changes. However, the indirect cost lies in the potential stagnation of the system and the delay in possibly beneficial updates. Nevertheless, the intention is to prevent hasty, uninformed decisions that could potentially incur higher costs, both financially and operationally, in the long run. Hello, we are the writersclub. Inspired by some of @ 0 xSword recent posts, we’d like to put forward a few ideas for the DAO to weigh in on. You can contact our small group @ writersclub 33 @gmail.com with proposal ideas or inquiries. We do not always respond to messages but are recruiting.
  Likes: 1 Replies: 2
  Likers: Ronei
  Replies:

  • CEOofWeb3.0: writersclub33: Halt Changes To Core Process & Voting Mechanics for One Year Prohibiting changes to the Status Quo for an entire year sounds like technological stagnation to me. We can’t afford to fall behind the technological curve at this stage. Also, no major changes can be made without overwhelming buy in from the community itself. Much less of it happening hastily. But ultimately, we’re subservient to the will of the DAO and I’d love to see what the community thinks of this. I’d also love to know your opinion on this, do you think any proposal to change the Status Quo can be made hastily cause even the Process for Getting AIPs up for vote. Although our approaches with this are fundamentally incompatible, I wish you the best of luck with this proposal.
  • br00no: I’m author of the 2/3 AIP (for changes to fundamental tenets of the DAO not to all votes), though I’m increasingly of the mind that it doesn’t capture the true spirit behind it which is to prevent damaging or hijacking - unintentional or otherwise - core tenets and functions of the DAO. I am in favor of that spirit. The AIP itself was mostly meant to further discussion on that topic, so I’m neutral on how that may be done, and here we are with a different and possibly better or more effective idea. A major road block has been defining: writersclub33: major changes to ApeCoin DAO’s core processes How do we define this?
• Community Impact Project (501c3 + Construction Group) by writersclub33 - No Role
  Posted on: June 6, 2023, 10:52 p.m.
  Content: Yes. We could create giant concrete complexes, design a construction solution that can last many years, small rooms with perhaps a window, but honest and able housing. Very big complexes. With partnerships with local and federal, the 501 c 3 +construction company could be successful. Especially if it could draft plans and work on the ground in whatever area their in (california seems ideal). What funding and support would be needed to get started? Basic setup to allow token holders to make input on decisions is doable without a grant or use of brand name. Any interested can participate.
  Likes: 2 Replies: 0
  Likers: Ronei, Brandonb91002
  No replies yet.
• Introductions Summer 2023 by writersclub33 - No Role
  Posted on: June 6, 2023, 10:46 p.m.
  Content: Hello, we are the writers club It’s three of us right now that follow the forum activity throughout the day while working. Some of us day trade and have boring jobs. We have proposal ideas .Gm gm Who else is here? Introductions, anyone?
  Likes: 7 Replies: 0
  Likers: Ms_NFTy, Nyamerdeneb, Ronei, Sasha, TheFatherOfAllStorms, Cardo, AaronHaber
  No replies yet.