Profile of Dicaso in Optimism
Posts by Dicaso
-
Retro Funding 4: Onchain Builders - round details
by Dicaso - No Role
Posted on: May 6, 2024, 5:55 p.m.
Content:
system:
Made their contract code available in a public Github repo, for which ownership has been verified in the Retro Funding sign up process
Hi, regarding the requirement for a Github Repo, can this be waved for Onchain Art /NFT projects? We generally stick to decentralized protocols/launchpads when creating contracts. (Have 3 popular collections on the Superchain) I imagine there may be some other projects that contribute to onchain activity but don’t meet this requirement.
In many ways we promote tech by working closely with other projects. Recently we created a Liquid NFT project on Base that will be the first to deploy on Liquidify v 3 , for example.
Likes: 2
Replies: 1
Replies:
- Dataluzdy: I have the same question, about NFT… Thank you for answering.
-
RetroPGF Round 3 Feedback Thread
by Dicaso - No Role
Posted on: Nov. 30, 2023, 12:11 a.m.
Content: On Lists Lists create recency bias by elevating whatever the creator decides to highlight. I have seen projects listed incorrectly where they do not belong, while others are completely neglected when deserving. A reputation system, or perhaps the ability for badgeholders to comment directly on applications would be far more constructive. The sheer number of applications (over 600 ) means that any list created will be prone to error. On Ballots There are plenty of deserving projects that have no visibility. I think the quorum is quite arbitrary and it is strange to see some meme projects and small blogs getting more ballots than heavy hitters in the industry. Many projects have resorted to shilling 15 their applications on Discord and X. I think this is enigmatic of a wider visibility issue. I have heard people say that its early and all votes haven’t been casted but if you’re a smaller project you face the risk of not meeting quorum and their is an oppurtunity cost to doing nothing… which is probably why there has been so much feedback
Likes: 6
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
RetroPGF Round 3 Feedback Thread
by Dicaso - No Role
Posted on: Nov. 29, 2023, 7:11 p.m.
Content: On Lists
Lists create recency bias by elevating whatever the creator decides to highlight. I have seen projects listed incorrectly where they do not belong, while others are completely neglected when deserving. A reputation system, or perhaps the ability for badgeholders to comment directly on applications would be far more constructive. The sheer number of applications (over 600 ) means that any list created will be prone to error.
On Ballots
There are plenty of deserving projects that have no visibility. I think the quorum is quite arbitrary and it is strange to see some meme projects and small blogs getting more ballots than heavy hitters in the industry. Many projects have resorted to shilling 15 their applications on Discord and X. I think this is enigmatic of a wider visibility issue. I have heard people say that its early and all votes haven’t been casted but if you’re a smaller project you face the risk of not meeting quorum and their is an oppurtunity cost to doing nothing… which is probably why there has been so much feedback
Likes: 7
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
RetroPGF Round 3 Feedback Thread
by Dicaso - No Role
Posted on: Nov. 29, 2023, 7:11 p.m.
Content: On Lists
Lists create recency bias by elevating whatever the creator decides to highlight. I have seen projects listed incorrectly where they do not belong, while others are completely neglected when deserving. A reputation system, or perhaps the ability for badgeholders to comment directly on applications would be far more constructive. The sheer number of applications (over 600 ) means that any list created will be prone to error.
On Ballots
There are plenty of deserving projects that have no visibility. I think the quorum is quite arbitrary and it is strange to see some meme projects and small blogs getting more ballots than heavy hitters in the industry. Many projects have resorted to shilling their applications on Discord and X. I think this is enigmatic of a wider visibility issue. I have heard people say that its early and all votes haven’t been casted but if you’re a smaller project you face the risk of not meeting quorum and their is an oppurtunity cost to doing nothing… which is probably why there has been so much feedback
Likes: 7
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
About the Monitoring category
by Dicaso - No Role
Posted on: March 23, 2023, 1:47 a.m.
Content: I think monitoring is the most important category. glad to contribute to the discussion
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
No likes yet.
No replies yet.
-
Layer2DAO response to allegations from Velodrome / OptiChads [March 2023]
by Dicaso - No Role
Posted on: March 23, 2023, 1:11 a.m.
Content: Proof one of the founders @ 0 xWeston has washtraded his own exchange. image 1440 × 1751 132 KB image 1440 × 3088 151 KB image 1440 × 2207 94 . 1 KB nftearth.exchange NFTEarth: Buy and Sell NFTs on L 2 2 Buy and Sell NFTs on L 2 at NFTEarth Screenshots are a week old. But you can verify for yourself. I hope these visual representations are easier to comprehend than just links to etherscan. The same wallet voted on every tx to sell and transfer the 55 , 000 OP that was embezzled (SO FAR???) Can the team please comment on how this is a good use of a founders resources, especially given he has voted on all of the 2 / 5 multisigs that have embezzled funds?
Likes: 1
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
Investigation into potential L2DAO OP Mismanagement: Findings
by Dicaso - No Role
Posted on: March 23, 2023, 12:39 a.m.
Content: Can you explain specifically which on-chain transaction is a lie? These are indeed where the funds went, and are adresses belonging to the team as confirmed above.
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
No likes yet.
No replies yet.
-
Layer2DAO response to allegations from Velodrome / OptiChads [March 2023]
by Dicaso - No Role
Posted on: March 23, 2023, 12:08 a.m.
Content: I find it strange that my posts that have been up for hours are only flagged after the the L 2 DAO team shows up. This is clearly an attempt by the team to manipulate information. Optimism governance should be a censorship free zone.
Likes: 2
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
Layer2DAO response to allegations from Velodrome / OptiChads [March 2023]
by Dicaso - No Role
Posted on: March 23, 2023, 12:05 a.m.
Content: Nice it will take a lot of work to look at these but I just opened the NFTE wallet and found the same fraud that has been pointed out multiple times in these forums. We know on chain that 55 , 000 OP has been embezzled already. I am wondering why the “team” you “allocated” these funds to with your 2 / 5 multisig market dumped, transferred the funds into new wallets and purchased NFTs from their own exchange, $NFTE, other altcoins, and performed day trades. Are these the sort of transactions that your “dao” allocated the funds for?
Likes: 1
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
About the Monitoring category
by Dicaso - No Role
Posted on: March 22, 2023, 9:47 p.m.
Content: I think monitoring is the most important category. glad to contribute to the discussion
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
No likes yet.
No replies yet.
