Profile of Jonas in Optimism
Posts by Jonas
-
Retro Funding 6: Badgeholder Manual
by Jonas - This user is a moderator
Posted on: Oct. 31, 2024, 4:46 p.m.
Content: Yes that’s correct @joanbp
Likes: 2
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
Retro Funding 6: Badgeholder Manual
by Jonas - This user is a moderator
Posted on: Oct. 31, 2024, 4:46 p.m.
Content: Thanks for catching! Fixed
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
No likes yet.
No replies yet.
-
Retro Funding 6: Governance - Round details
by Jonas - This user is a moderator
Posted on: Sept. 26, 2024, 10:14 a.m.
Content: Application window has been pushed back to start on Tuesday, Oct 1 st. The post has been updated to reflect this. We need a bit more time for everything to run smooth :pray:
Likes: 16
Replies: 0
Likers:
Gonna.eth,
Sixty,
Pumbi,
escottalexander,
Tekr0x.eth,
brichis,
joanbp,
dmars300,
eugenia,
DanSingjoy,
Liliop.eth,
LuukDAO,
delphine,
wannabeswanop,
ismailemin,
LauNaMu
No replies yet.
-
Retro Funding 5: Application Review Process
by Jonas - This user is a moderator
Posted on: Sept. 25, 2024, 7:22 a.m.
Content: The Review process has completed!
Total Applications reviewed: 149
Applications approved: 79
Applications Rejected: 68
Applications Withdrawn: 2
You can find the results in this spreadsheet here
Likes: 3
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
Retro Funding 5: Application Review Process
by Jonas - This user is a moderator
Posted on: Sept. 25, 2024, 7:22 a.m.
Content: The Review process has completed!
Total Applications reviewed: 149
Applications approved: 79
Applications Rejected: 68
Applications Withdrawn: 2
You can find the results in this spreadsheet here 27
Likes: 3
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
Retro Funding 5: OP Stack - round details
by Jonas - This user is a moderator
Posted on: Sept. 20, 2024, 6:05 a.m.
Content: Appreciate the feedback on the decision to have voters decide on the rounds token allocation @grapebaba @timbeiko @cheeky-gorilla.
Agree here that the number of projects is not sufficient information to decide on the rounds token allocation. Also hear that voters shouldn’t be biased by the Foundation’s view on this, will take this as feedback to not surface the Foundation’s opinion in the voting experience.
To expand on the rationale for this decision: At the Foundation, we are concerned that the token amount is too high for the round (as mentioned in the original post). Voters will have better insights into this decision, as they will review projects and exchange information on what amount they deem appropriate to reward their impact. Having voters make this decision seems like a sensible experiment instead of the Foundation readjusting the rounds token allocation.
Likes: 2
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
Retro Funding 5: Application Review Process
by Jonas - This user is a moderator
Posted on: Sept. 17, 2024, 5:57 a.m.
Content: The initial phase of reviews has been completed
Total Applications reviewed: 149
Initial Review Approved: 63
Initial Review Rejected: 85
Pending: 1
You can find the results in this spreadsheet here 46
If your project has been rejected, you can hand in an appeal by Thursday 18 : 00 , Sept 19 th. Below you find a guide on how to hand in an appeal.
Find your project in Charmverse: You can find a link to your project page in Charmverse here 46 , this has also been shared with you via email.
Log-in: Identify who on your team is able to submit an appeal. To do so, please refer back to the original application and locate the ‘Authors’. Any one of these authors will have the ability to submit an appeal for your project by logging in with their Farcaster account.
Rejection reason: Review the rejection reason by clicking on the comments of reviewers (see screenshot below)
Screenshot 2024 - 09 - 17 at 11 . 55 . 161374 × 722 79 . 6 KB
Submit appeal: Locate and click on the appeal button in the bottom right hand side of your screen. In order to view the reasons why your application was rejected, click on the comment box on the right hand side of your screen.
Screenshot 2024 - 09 - 17 at 11 . 56 . 11834 × 716 168 KB
Appeal outcome: Your appeal will be reviewed and you will be notified of the outcome on Tuesday, Sept 24 th
If you experience any issues, please jump into the #retrofunding-discussion channel in the Optimism Discord :pray:
Likes: 5
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
Retro Funding 5: Application Review Process
by Jonas - This user is a moderator
Posted on: Sept. 17, 2024, 5:57 a.m.
Content: The initial phase of reviews has been completed
Total Applications reviewed: 149
Initial Review Approved: 63
Initial Review Rejected: 85
Pending: 1
You can find the results in this spreadsheet here
If your project has been rejected, you can hand in an appeal by Thursday 18 : 00 , Sept 19 th. Below you find a guide on how to hand in an appeal.
Find your project in Charmverse: You can find a link to your project page in Charmverse here, this has also been shared with you via email.
Log-in: Identify who on your team is able to submit an appeal. To do so, please refer back to the original application and locate the ‘Authors’. Any one of these authors will have the ability to submit an appeal for your project by logging in with their Farcaster account.
Rejection reason: Review the rejection reason by clicking on the comments of reviewers (see screenshot below)
Screenshot 2024 - 09 - 17 at 11 . 55 . 161374 × 722 79 . 6 KB
Submit appeal: Locate and click on the appeal button in the bottom right hand side of your screen. In order to view the reasons why your application was rejected, click on the comment box on the right hand side of your screen.
Screenshot 2024 - 09 - 17 at 11 . 56 . 11834 × 716 168 KB
Appeal outcome: Your appeal will be reviewed and you will be notified of the outcome on Tuesday, Sept 24 th
If you experience any issues, please jump into the #retrofunding-discussion channel in the Optimism Discord :pray:
Likes: 5
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
Retro Funding 6: Governance - Round details
by Jonas - This user is a moderator
Posted on: Sept. 17, 2024, 5:21 a.m.
Content: As usual, there’ll be forum posts from Citizens’ with feedback on round 5 . Additionally, there’ll be a survey built into the voting UI to collect more quantifiable feedback from citizens.
Likes: 6
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
Retro Funding 5: Application Review Process
by Jonas - This user is a moderator
Posted on: Sept. 10, 2024, 5:46 a.m.
Content: Updates to RF 5 Application Review Process
The sign up to become a reviewer has been closed with 11 total submissions. This is much lower compared to previous rounds, which can partly be explained by the requirement to have relevant knowledge of the OP Stack. The application process for Retro Funding 5 has closed with 145 submissions.
As a consequence of the lower participation rate, the following updates will be made to the process:
2 reviewer groups: There is roughly equal distribution across the three categories, while early observations show that the OP Stack Tooling & OP Stack R&D categories have higher rate of non-eligible applicants. As a result, there will be one group dedicated to reviewing Ethereum Core Contributions and one group dedicated to reviewing the OP Stack Tooling & OP Stack R&D categories.
Appeals by the same group: The project appeals will be reviewed by the same reviewer group. This ensures that reviewers have sufficient context on the categories eligibility criteria to make informed decisions. While appeal reviews by a different group are overall desirable, the goal of consistent decision making within the application review process takes higher priority.
Jump seat reviewer: One reviewer will be on standby in case another reviewer drops out.
Removal of “Rule Violation Check” step: To increase the efficiency of the process, all applications will be immediately reviewed by 5 reviewers, instead of an initial check by 2 reviewers. Considering the low number of applications, the reduction in reviews by this optimisation is likely not worth the additional time required to complete it.
Likes: 4
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
