Profile of Marcus01 in Optimism
Posts by Marcus01
-
Optimism Chinese Community (OP 中文力量) - General Communication Thread
by Marcus01 - No Role
Posted on: Oct. 27, 2024, 2:41 p.m.
Content: September Report
Article Translation
Demystifying superchain – How to Share the Revenue Collectively with Optimism
Sony enters the blockchain space - Soneium joins Superchain
Retro Funding# 6 : Governance
Weekly Update
Optimism Chinese Weekly # 27
Optimism Chinese Weekly # 28
Optimism Chinese Weekly # 29
Optimism Chinese Weekly # 30
Delegate Information
image 1539 × 988 90 . 3 KB
OP Chinese Power currently has 233 , 273 . 4 Delegate OPs ( 1482 %+ month-over-month growth), with a Delegate rank of 53 !
Thanks to the support of OP builders, we will update our governance progress in this post!
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
No likes yet.
No replies yet.
-
Optimism Governance Survey - We Want to Hear from You!
by Marcus01 - No Role
Posted on: Oct. 27, 2024, 2:34 p.m.
Content: Look forward to share the results with us
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
No likes yet.
No replies yet.
-
Accelerated Decentralization Proposal For Optimism
by Marcus01 - No Role
Posted on: Sept. 26, 2024, 4:09 a.m.
Content: From Optimism Chinsese Community, we voted in favour of the petition, but that doesn’t mean we support the proposal, we would like to initiate some communication agenda about Token House and the Foundation
What I think is bad about this proposal is
Decentralised governance is a long and arduous process, which is full of many explorations, and we don’t think that accelerated decentralisation will give a big boost to the Optimism collective at this point in time, on the contrary, a lot of the work that the Optimism Foundation and Op labs have done, in terms of superchain scaling, upgrading of Op stacks, etc., is something that we think is very good, and some of the rights of the The lower part of the Council and the Anti-Capture Committee have given Token House some decision-making power.
What we don’t think is good at the moment is
Optimism Foundation’s long-term roadmap for decentralisation is not clear, we think the foundation needs to have some sort of long-term roadmap, including the process of transferring the governance fund contract, and the application scenarios of OP tokens (at present, there are no other application scenarios except governance).
Through this petition, we hope to suggest a cyclical dialogue where the Optimism Foundation can make some clearer governance roadmap based on community feedback.
Likes: 3
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
GovNFT Help and FAQ
by Marcus01 - No Role
Posted on: Sept. 24, 2024, 2:56 p.m.
Content: Hello, can anyone help me?
What I want to know is how do I get GovNFT, I am participating in the Optimism GovNFT programme but I found out that I don’t have GovNFT, is GovNFT distributed automatically?
It can’t mint seem
govnft.eth.limo
GOVNFT 6
NFTs for vesting and distribution of (governance) tokens.
17272041821242140 × 1033 155 KB
Likes: 1
Replies: 1
-
GovNFT Help and FAQ
by Marcus01 - No Role
Posted on: Sept. 24, 2024, 2:56 p.m.
Content: Hello, can anyone help me?
What I want to know is how do I get GovNFT, I am participating in the Optimism GovNFT programme but I found out that I don’t have GovNFT, is GovNFT distributed automatically?
It can’t mint seem
govnft.eth.limo
GOVNFT
NFTs for vesting and distribution of (governance) tokens.
17272041821242140 × 1033 155 KB
Likes: 1
Replies: 1
-
GovNFT Community Call Thread 2
by Marcus01 - No Role
Posted on: Sept. 18, 2024, 2:45 p.m.
Content: Thank you, Michael, I already changed my answer
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
No likes yet.
No replies yet.
-
GovNFT Governance Topic Thread 1
by Marcus01 - No Role
Posted on: Sept. 18, 2024, 2:27 p.m.
Content: Thank you, Michael, I will revise my answer
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
No likes yet.
No replies yet.
-
Optimism Chinese Community (OP 中文力量) - General Communication Thread
by Marcus01 - No Role
Posted on: Sept. 17, 2024, 5:47 a.m.
Content: August Report
Article translation
Superscan: The Ultimate Block Browser for the Superscan Ecosystem
Building a Unified Superscan
Article output
Optimism Season 6 Guide
Introducing Retro Funding # 4
Weekly Update
Optimism 中文周刊# 23
Optimism 中文周刊# 24
Optimism 中文周刊# 25
Optimism 中文周刊# 26
Delegate Information
OP Chinese Power currently has 233 , 273 . 4 Delegate OPs ( 1482 %+ month-over-month growth), with a Delegate rank of 55 th!
Thank you OP builders for your support, we will update our governance progress in this thread
image 1584 × 924 115 KB
What we’ll do next
Getting involved in Devcon 7
We applied for some discounted tickets to Devcon 7 last month, and we’ll be travelling to Bangkok in November for Devcon 7 , where we’ll be liaising with more of the Optimism and EtherCommunity core teams!
Governance Enhancement
We will attract more people to Delegate their votes to us, so that Chinese power can have more participation and influence in OP governance. We promise to share governance information in a timely manner and actively participate in decision making.
Delegate link: https://vote.optimism.io/delegates/ 0 xC 841 D 6 DdF 66467 Af 551 b 35218 c 0 c 2 e 22 f 9 C 14 b 48 ?dssave=true
We will hold regular governance sharing sessions to share our governance decisions and help more people understand Optimism governance.
Likes: 1
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
GovNFT Community Call Thread 4
by Marcus01 - No Role
Posted on: Sept. 13, 2024, 8:56 a.m.
Content: Hi, Michael, Happy to see you
This is my answer
Guest voters for Retro Funding Round 6 will be randomly selected. How do you think they will vote differently on Round 6 compared to Badgeholders?
Since most of the Guest Votes probably aren’t involved enough in the Optimism eco-governance, I think the Guest Votes may lack some professionalism compared to the Badgeholder, and they may vote for projects that seem straightforwardly exciting, have more obvious benefits, and are shorter term in nature, whereas the Badgeholder would be voting more on the Projects that focus on Optimism’s long-term ecological construction
I’ve looked at the general process for electing guest votes
Retro Funding 6 : Announcing Guest Voter participation Retro Funding ?
Retroactive Public Goods Funding (Retro Funding) 6 was recently announced, and will award OP to contributions made to the Optimism Collective governance system. As part of Round 6 , a set of Guest Voters will be invited to participate alongside Citizens. Similar to the experiment in Round 5 , the goal is to learn more about different voter selection mechanisms as a way to create a foundation of knowledge that can be used when making decisions about Citizen selection in the future.
Research Questi…
Firstly, I think choosing Farcaster as a random sample of guests is a good case study, there are a lot of active Optimism and Superchain users on Farcaster!
I think electing guest voters should be more about their past experience in governance, such as whether they have been involved in governance of other DAOs, how active they have been in governance, what governance improvements they have suggested, how many governance proposals they have prompted, and, we need to exclude potential guest voters who have initiated governance attacks, that’s my idea!
Likes: 1
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
GovNFT Community Call Thread 2
by Marcus01 - No Role
Posted on: Sept. 12, 2024, 8:03 a.m.
Content: Having seen this question, I think there’s a lot I could have wanted to answer, and I’m happy to share it with you all!
What projects are eligible for Round 5 of retrofunding?
There are three categories that can be rewarded in Retro Funding 5 : Op stacks
Ethereum Core Contributions,OP Stack Research & Development,OP Stack Tooling
These projects include Op stack or Op stack-dependent infrastructure, contributions that directly contribute to Op stack upgrades or protocol upgrades, Op stack deployment or testing tools.
I think projects like solidity, hardhat, etc. can apply in this round and deserve to be rewarded.
More Detail: Retro Funding 5 : OP Stack - round details
Translation into Chinese:Retro Funding 5 : OP Stack — Optimism 中文
What is the main experiment for Round 5 of retrofunding?
For the first time, guest experts were brought in to participate in the scoring of Retro Funding, which was a departure from previous designs, and I’m all for the idea!
Unlike previous Retro Funding rounds, Op stack rounds need to be judged by experts who have contributed to the op stack, which is a much more accurate criterion, and I think opening up the guest voter is a good thing.
More detail:
Retro Funding 5 : Expert voting experiment Retro Funding ?
Retroactive Public Goods Funding 5 (Retro Funding) will reward contributions to the OP Stack. A high degree of knowledge is required to understand the OP Stack’s different components, the impact of protocol development initiatives and the usefulness of tools that support OP chain operators. The hypothesis that round 5 is aiming to test is if experts make better OP allocation decisions on OP Stack contributions compared to non-experts.
Research Questions
The Retro Funding 5 governance experiment…
Likes: 0
Replies: 1
No likes yet.
Replies:
- Michael: Hey Marcus,
This looks like a copy/paste of the forum post. Answer like this will not qualify for points.
Thank you for your understanding.