Profile of mel.eth in Optimism
Posts by mel.eth
-
StableLab - Delegate Communication Thread
by mel.eth - No Role
Posted on: Oct. 21, 2024, 9:49 a.m.
Content: Rolling Mission Requests: Voting Cycle 28 1
Vote: Increase Prevalence of Non-USD/EURO Stablecoins.
Rationale: Interesting vertical that moves Optimism toward the target metric of increasing active development on the superchain.
Likes: 0
Replies: 0
No likes yet.
No replies yet.
-
Round 3 Voting Rationale
by mel.eth - No Role
Posted on: Dec. 12, 2023, 8:29 p.m.
Content: Crossposting my RPGF 3 list methodology: Applied Governance Efficacy Allocation Framework (Methodology and NOFM Matrix); thanks for highlighting @lavande !! This methodology focuses on characterizing the relative constituent size of those communities providing and receiving benefit re the collective, applying more governance tokens to larger and more inter-operative existing governance communities, that will participate in Optimism governance. I welcome feedback and challenge! RetroPGF Round 3 Feedback Thread ? RetroPGF I enjoyed working on the methodology for a list. Not sure if they are going to be public so I’ll leave out the results, but sharing the methodology for discussion: mel.eth’s Applied Governance Efficacy Allocation Framework (Methodology and NOFM Matrix) About This list encompasses the application of the following methodology as conceived and applied by mel.eth as could best be derived from the 104 Collective Governance related applications reviewed. The focus is on PEOPLE: those that create gove…
Likes: 2
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
Round 3 Voting Rationale
by mel.eth - No Role
Posted on: Dec. 12, 2023, 3:29 p.m.
Content: Crossposting my RPGF 3 list methodology: Applied Governance Efficacy Allocation Framework (Methodology and NOFM Matrix); thanks for highlighting @lavande !!
This methodology focuses on characterizing the relative constituent size of those communities providing and receiving benefit re the collective, applying more governance tokens to larger and more inter-operative existing governance communities, that will participate in Optimism governance. I welcome feedback and challenge!
RetroPGF Round 3 Feedback Thread ? RetroPGF
I enjoyed working on the methodology for a list. Not sure if they are going to be public so I’ll leave out the results, but sharing the methodology for discussion:
mel.eth’s Applied Governance Efficacy Allocation Framework (Methodology and NOFM Matrix)
About
This list encompasses the application of the following methodology as conceived and applied by mel.eth as could best be derived from the 104 Collective Governance related applications reviewed. The focus is on PEOPLE: those that create gove…
Likes: 3
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
RetroPGF Round 3 Feedback Thread
by mel.eth - No Role
Posted on: Dec. 5, 2023, 2:07 p.m.
Content: I enjoyed working on the methodology for a list. Not sure if they are going to be public so I’ll leave out the results, but sharing the methodology for discussion: mel.eth’s Applied Governance Efficacy Allocation Framework (Methodology and NOFM Matrix) About This list encompasses the application of the following methodology as conceived and applied by mel.eth as could best be derived from the 104 Collective Governance related applications reviewed. The focus is on PEOPLE: those that create governance communities and those that create accretive participation, via same. When unsure, I remained OPTIMISTIC about the prospect of the applicant. Impact Evaluation Of the 104 categorical applicants, 3 categories and 7 data points were used to obtain seven (six funded and one unfunded) discrete amounts, one for each applicant. Categories: Contributors were assessed along the lines of ONE (creator or company), FEW (team or DAO), MANY (collective or delegation) Beneficiaries were assessed along the lines of Few (small delegations or DAOs) and Many (other builders and users) Good Governors were assessed as Yes (likely to vote with or delegate OP tokens) or No (not likely to actively govern with OP tokens or no retro OP/Governance contribution highlighted in application) Matrix {CONTRIBUTORS}:{Beneficiaries} with values used: Distribution of Weights None One Few Many NONE 0 0 0 0 ONE 0 0 0 . 075 0 . 100 FEW 0 0 0 . 125 0 . 175 MANY 0 0 0 . 200 0 . 325 Total weight check: 1 . 0 *Good Governor (GG) Multiplier Y/N: [ 1 , 0 ] Value assigned by characterizing each applicant, thence [{NOFM}:{nofm}]*{GG}. Once obtained, all available OP tokens were allocated among the 91 / 104 applicants that had non-zero allocations. It has been my pleasure to contribute here; best efforts were made, thank you and good hunting. mel.eth http://themelv.in
Likes: 2
Replies: 1
Replies:
- lavande: Would suggest you cross-post this voting rationale!
-
RetroPGF Round 3 Feedback Thread
by mel.eth - No Role
Posted on: Dec. 5, 2023, 9:07 a.m.
Content: I enjoyed working on the methodology for a list. Not sure if they are going to be public so I’ll leave out the results, but sharing the methodology for discussion:
mel.eth’s Applied Governance Efficacy Allocation Framework (Methodology and NOFM Matrix)
About
This list encompasses the application of the following methodology as conceived and applied by mel.eth as could best be derived from the 104 Collective Governance related applications reviewed. The focus is on PEOPLE: those that create governance communities and those that create accretive participation, via same. When unsure, I remained OPTIMISTIC about the prospect of the applicant.
Impact Evaluation
Of the 104 categorical applicants, 3 categories and 7 data points were used to obtain seven (six funded and one unfunded) discrete amounts, one for each applicant.
Categories:
Contributors were assessed along the lines of ONE (creator or company), FEW (team or DAO), MANY (collective or delegation)
Beneficiaries were assessed along the lines of Few (small delegations or DAOs) and Many (other builders and users)
Good Governors were assessed as Yes (likely to vote with or delegate OP tokens) or No (not likely to actively govern with OP tokens or no retro OP/Governance contribution highlighted in application)
Matrix {CONTRIBUTORS}:{Beneficiaries} with values used:
Distribution of Weights
None
One
Few
Many
NONE
0
0
0
0
ONE
0
0
0 . 075
0 . 100
FEW
0
0
0 . 125
0 . 175
MANY
0
0
0 . 200
0 . 325
Total weight check: 1 . 0
*Good Governor (GG) Multiplier Y/N: [ 1 , 0 ]
Value assigned by characterizing each applicant, thence [{NOFM}:{nofm}]*{GG}. Once obtained, all available OP tokens were allocated among the 91 / 104 applicants that had non-zero allocations.
It has been my pleasure to contribute here; best efforts were made, thank you and good hunting.
mel.eth http://themelv.in
Likes: 2
Replies: 1
Replies:
- lavande: Would suggest you cross-post this voting rationale!
-
3rd Citizens’ House community call [September 12st @ 9am PT / 12pm ET / 6pm CET]
by mel.eth - No Role
Posted on: Sept. 12, 2023, 5:47 p.m.
Content: Tried a few times. There were 5 of us on and chatting when we rugged, then I got that above screen about 3 times. All love, next one :point_up: Thanks for the notes @ethdaily !
Likes: 1
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
3rd Citizens’ House community call [September 12st @ 9am PT / 12pm ET / 6pm CET]
by mel.eth - No Role
Posted on: Sept. 12, 2023, 4:05 p.m.
Content: Got rugged at the top. Pls post cliff notes or reschedule if:when available. :pray: IMG_ 70821170 × 1164 119 KB
Likes: 1
Replies: 1
Replies:
- Gonna.eth: Did you rejoin? When I opened the call zoom told me I had another call running. But the link was the same. Sorry about this.
-
3rd Citizens’ House community call [September 12st @ 9am PT / 12pm ET / 6pm CET]
by mel.eth - No Role
Posted on: Sept. 12, 2023, 1:47 p.m.
Content: Tried a few times. There were 5 of us on and chatting when we rugged, then I got that above screen about 3 times. All love, next one :point_up:
Thanks for the notes @ethdaily !
Likes: 1
Replies: 0
No replies yet.
-
3rd Citizens’ House community call [September 12st @ 9am PT / 12pm ET / 6pm CET]
by mel.eth - No Role
Posted on: Sept. 12, 2023, 12:05 p.m.
Content: Got rugged at the top. Pls post cliff notes or reschedule if:when available. :pray:
IMG_ 70821170 × 1164 119 KB
Likes: 1
Replies: 1
Replies:
- Gonna.eth: Did you rejoin? When I opened the call zoom told me I had another call running. But the link was the same. Sorry about this.
