Please refer to the Badgeholder Nominations Roundup for the final list of valid nominations
As part of the recently announced retroPGF 2 , voting badges will be distributed to a set of 90 community members. One voting badge will be given to 10 Token House delegates. The post below outlines what this means for Token House delegates.
From December 8 th - December 14 th:
Each delegate with greater than > 0 . 5 % voting power may nominate 2 Token House delegates to be badgeholders for rPGF 2 . Each of the 10 elected Token House delegates will be able to distribute an additional badge to an individual of their choosing
If you have > 0 . 5 % votable supply and would like to nominate a delegate, please complete the template below and post to this forum thread by December 14 th at 7 pm GMT
There is no voting power requirement for nominees, but nominees must have posted a delegate commitment by 12 / 5 / 2022 . Delegates may not nominate themselves
Please note that holding a voting badge for one round does not guarantee voting rights in subsequent rounds; Citizenship criteria are subject to change going forward
If an elected Token House delegate is or becomes ineligible to receive a badge (ie. if they will receive a badge based on other criteria or become a member of the Optimism team), the elected badgeholder will select a replacement to receive their badge instead.
From December 15 th - December 21 st:
The Token House will vote to select 10 badgeholders from the full list of nominees. This vote will occur via approval voting on Snapshot. Voting is set up such that you can place a vote for any number of nominees. The 10 nominees with the most votes will receive voting badges for rPGF 2 . This is approval voting, not ranked choice, meaning each selected choice will receive equal voting power.
From January 3 rd - Jan 17 th:
Anyone can nominate a project or person for funding in rPGF 2 , following the process outlined here
From January 31 st - February 10 th:
Token House delegate badgeholders will vote on which projects receive rPGF in round 2
Token House Badgeholder Nomination Template
Nominating delegate:
Link to delegate commitment:
Link to verify delegation of > 0 . 5 % of the votable supply:
Name of delegate you’d like to nominate:
Link to nominee’s delegate commitment:
Why do you believe this delegate should receive an rPGF 2 voting badge?
The post provides details on the process of selecting badgeholders for retroPGF 2. Token House delegates with over 0.5% voting power can nominate 2 Token House delegates to be badgeholders. Each elected delegate can give an additional badge. Nominations should be made by December 14. Voting on badgeholders will occur from December 15-21 via approval voting on Snapshot. The post outlines the nomination template and timeline for voting and project funding in retroPGF 2.
Please refer to the Badgeholder Nominations Roundup 38 for the final list of valid nominations
…
Please refer to the Badgeholder Nominations Roundup 38 for the final list of valid nominations
As part of the recently announced retroPGF 2 62 , voting badges will be distributed to a set of 90 community members. One voting badge will be given to 10 Token House delegates. The post below outlines what this means for Token House delegates.
From December 8 th - December 14 th:
Each delegate with greater than > 0 . 5 % voting power may nominate 2 Token House delegates to be badgeholders for rPGF 2 . Each of the 10 elected Token House delegates will be able to distribute an additional badge to an individual of their choosing
If you have > 0 . 5 % votable supply and would like to nominate a delegate, please complete the template below and post to this forum thread 24 by December 14 th at 7 pm GMT
There is no voting power requirement for nominees, but nominees must have posted a delegate commitment by 12 / 5 / 2022 . Delegates may not nominate themselves
Please note that holding a voting badge for one round does not guarantee voting rights in subsequent rounds; Citizenship criteria are subject to change going forward
If an elected Token House delegate is or becomes ineligible to receive a badge (ie. if they will receive a badge based on other criteria or become a member of the Optimism team), the elected badgeholder will select a replacement to receive their badge instead.
From December 15 th - December 21 st:
The Token House will vote to select 10 badgeholders from the full list of nominees. This vote will occur via approval voting 19 on Snapshot. Voting is set up such that you can place a vote for any number of nominees. The 10 nominees with the most votes will receive voting badges for rPGF 2 . This is approval voting, not ranked choice, meaning each selected choice will receive equal voting power.
From January 3 rd - Jan 17 th:
Anyone can nominate a project or person for funding in rPGF 2 , following the process outlined here 62
From January 31 st - February 10 th:
Token House delegate badgeholders will vote on which projects receive rPGF in round 2
Token House Badgeholder Nomination Template
Nominating delegate:
Link to delegate commitment:
Link to verify delegation of > 0 . 5 % of the votable supply:
Name of delegate you’d like to nominate:
Link to nominee’s delegate commitment:
Why do you believe this delegate should receive an rPGF 2 voting badge?
Please refer to the Badgeholder Nominations Roundup 35 for the final list of valid nominations …
Please refer to the Badgeholder Nominations Roundup 35 for the final list of valid nominations As part of the recently announced retroPGF 2 61 , voting badges will be distributed to a set of 90 community members. One voting badge will be given to 10 Token House delegates. The post below outlines what this means for Token House delegates. From December 8 th - December 14 th: Each delegate with greater than > 0 . 5 % voting power may nominate 2 Token House delegates to be badgeholders for rPGF 2 . Each of the 10 elected Token House delegates will be able to distribute an additional badge to an individual of their choosing If you have > 0 . 5 % votable supply and would like to nominate a delegate, please complete the template below and post to this forum thread 24 by December 14 th at 7 pm GMT There is no voting power requirement for nominees, but nominees must have posted a delegate commitment by 12 / 5 / 2022 . Delegates may not nominate themselves Please note that holding a voting badge for one round does not guarantee voting rights in subsequent rounds; Citizenship criteria are subject to change going forward If an elected Token House delegate is or becomes ineligible to receive a badge (ie. if they will receive a badge based on other criteria or become a member of the Optimism team), the elected badgeholder will select a replacement to receive their badge instead. From December 15 th - December 21 st: The Token House will vote to select 10 badgeholders from the full list of nominees. This vote will occur via approval voting 18 on Snapshot. Voting is set up such that you can place a vote for any number of nominees. The 10 nominees with the most votes will receive voting badges for rPGF 2 . This is approval voting, not ranked choice, meaning each selected choice will receive equal voting power. From January 3 rd - Jan 17 th: Anyone can nominate a project or person for funding in rPGF 2 , following the process outlined here 61 From January 31 st - February 10 th: Token House delegate badgeholders will vote on which projects receive rPGF in round 2 Token House Badgeholder Nomination Template Nominating delegate: Link to delegate commitment: Link to verify delegation of > 0 . 5 % of the votable supply: Name of delegate you’d like to nominate: Link to nominee’s delegate commitment: Why do you believe this delegate should receive an rPGF 2 voting badge?
How exciting, it’s great to see the Citizen House starting to come together! I think that it was th…
How exciting, it’s great to see the Citizen House starting to come together! I think that it was this unique feature of Optimism’s governance that made it seem so interesting to so many of us!
As a quick question, if the people who were involved in RPGF 1 automatically get membership, could we get a list of who is in that category? I’ve got a couple of ideas for who to nominate, but don’t want to ‘waste’ my votes if they’re in already!
How exciting, it’s great to see the Citizen House starting to come together! I think that it was th…
How exciting, it’s great to see the Citizen House starting to come together! I think that it was this unique feature of Optimism’s governance that made it seem so interesting to so many of us! As a quick question, if the people who were involved in RPGF 1 automatically get membership, could we get a list of who is in that category? I’ve got a couple of ideas for who to nominate, but don’t want to ‘waste’ my votes if they’re in already!
List of rPGF 1 badgeholder is linked in Review of Optimism retro funding round 1 : Optimism RPGF …
List of rPGF 1 badgeholder is linked in Review of Optimism retro funding round 1 : Optimism RPGF 1 Results - Google Sheets
List of rPGF 1 badgeholder is linked in Review of Optimism retro funding round 1 21 : Optimism …
List of rPGF 1 badgeholder is linked in Review of Optimism retro funding round 1 21 : Optimism RPGF 1 Results - Google Sheets 18
List of rPGF 1 badgeholder is linked in Review of Optimism retro funding round 1 20 : Optimism …
List of rPGF 1 badgeholder is linked in Review of Optimism retro funding round 1 20 : Optimism RPGF 1 Results - Google Sheets 18
Updated to account for possible edge case:
If an elected Token House delegate is or becomes inelig…
Updated to account for possible edge case:
If an elected Token House delegate is or becomes ineligible to receive a badge (ie. if they will receive a badge based on other criteria or become a member of the Optimism team), the elected badgeholder will select a replacement to receive their badge instead.
Updated to include clarification on approval voting:
Voting is set up such that you can place a vote for any number of nominees. The 10 nominees with the most votes will receive voting badges for rPGF 2 . This is approval voting, not ranked choice, meaning each selected choice will receive equal voting power.
Updated to account for possible edge case: If an elected Token House delegate is or becomes inelig…
Updated to account for possible edge case: If an elected Token House delegate is or becomes ineligible to receive a badge (ie. if they will receive a badge based on other criteria or become a member of the Optimism team), the elected badgeholder will select a replacement to receive their badge instead. Updated to include clarification on approval voting: Voting is set up such that you can place a vote for any number of nominees. The 10 nominees with the most votes will receive voting badges for rPGF 2 . This is approval voting, not ranked choice, meaning each selected choice will receive equal voting power.
I wasn’t entirely sure how to proceed here so I voted for my top 10 nominees. This was difficult …
I wasn’t entirely sure how to proceed here so I voted for my top 10 nominees. This was difficult because every single nominee really is a stellar candidate, so limiting it to 10 was tough. On the other hand, having so many excellent candidates is a great problem to have and I’m so grateful to be surrounded by some of the best minds in the space :blush:.
I wasn’t entirely sure how to proceed here so I voted for my top 10 nominees. This was difficult …
I wasn’t entirely sure how to proceed here so I voted for my top 10 nominees. This was difficult because every single nominee really is a stellar candidate, so limiting it to 10 was tough. On the other hand, having so many excellent candidates is a great problem to have and I’m so grateful to be surrounded by some of the best minds in the space :blush:.
Okay so this was a tough one. Since there is so many awesome candidates, and I myself am also a can…
Okay so this was a tough one. Since there is so many awesome candidates, and I myself am also a candidate :sweat_smile:
I opted to not vote for myself (though some of my delegators told me otherwise).
I kept it simple and voted for the people I nominated. I intended to also nominate Joxes and as such I also voted for him.
So I voted for @jackanorak, @krzkaczor and @Joxes
Choosing top 10 was a tough one, few are already quite known in public good space, working, suppo…
Choosing top 10 was a tough one, few are already quite known in public good space, working, supporting, preserving and motivating others to contribute.
So to give everyone a fair chance, I read there delegation pitch and gone through their profile/comment history on this forum. If they have mentioned Public Good funding in their delegate pitch, I put them on top of list, followed by their interaction with Public Goods related topic/post on this forum in past season(s) and lastly there interest (giving preference to DAOs and Social Impact).
Voted for:-
Kris, Linda, SJP, MinimalGravitas, Dhante, Joxes, Bobby, Jrocki, Polynya and Scott. (as I am also nominated, opted not to vote for myself)
I was initially choosing to Abstain as I’m nominated. Even though I’d never vote for myself, I can …
I was initially choosing to Abstain as I’m nominated. Even though I’d never vote for myself, I can still reshuffle the order somewhat to benefit me. However, I’ll be voting for who I feel are the most engaged community members who are being undervalued.
Okay so this was a tough one. Since there is so many awesome candidates, and I myself am also a can…
Okay so this was a tough one. Since there is so many awesome candidates, and I myself am also a candidate :sweat_smile: I opted to not vote for myself (though some of my delegators told me otherwise). I kept it simple and voted for the people I nominated. I intended to also nominate Joxes and as such I also voted for him. So I voted for @jackanorak, @krzkaczor and @Joxes
Choosing top 10 was a tough one, few are already quite known in public good space, working, suppo…
Choosing top 10 was a tough one, few are already quite known in public good space, working, supporting, preserving and motivating others to contribute. So to give everyone a fair chance, I read there delegation pitch and gone through their profile/comment history on this forum. If they have mentioned Public Good funding in their delegate pitch, I put them on top of list, followed by their interaction with Public Goods related topic/post on this forum in past season(s) and lastly there interest (giving preference to DAOs and Social Impact). Voted for:- Kris, Linda, SJP, MinimalGravitas, Dhante, Joxes, Bobby, Jrocki, Polynya and Scott. (as I am also nominated, opted not to vote for myself)
I was initially choosing to Abstain as I’m nominated. Even though I’d never vote for myself, I can …
I was initially choosing to Abstain as I’m nominated. Even though I’d never vote for myself, I can still reshuffle the order somewhat to benefit me. However, I’ll be voting for who I feel are the most engaged community members who are being undervalued.
I want to share here from our communication thread what is our vision, approach and wishes about Ci…
I want to share here from our communication thread what is our vision, approach and wishes about Citizen House and the next round of RPGF:
Citizen House, Public Goods, why LATAM and Optimism 5
And, the current voting round:
About Badgeholder Nomination Voting 10
I want to share here from our communication thread what is our vision, approach and wishes about Ci…
I want to share here from our communication thread what is our vision, approach and wishes about Citizen House and the next round of RPGF:
Citizen House, Public Goods, why LATAM and Optimism
And, the current voting round:
About Badgeholder Nomination Voting
I want to share here from our communication thread what is our vision, approach and wishes about Ci…
I want to share here from our communication thread what is our vision, approach and wishes about Citizen House and the next round of RPGF: Citizen House, Public Goods, why LATAM and Optimism 5 And, the current voting round: About Badgeholder Nomination Voting 8
