0 xJohn made a proposal here Users who sold the initial OP airdrop should become ineligible for all future airdrops 62 making a proposal that “Users who sold the initial OP airdrop should become ineligible for all future airdrops”
Please i would start by saying that the crypto space and i believe Optimism comprises of a Decentralized ecosystem 'What is decentralization?
In blockchain, decentralization refers to the transfer of control and decision-making from a centralized entity (individual, organization, or group thereof) to a distributed network"
I would like to counter the 0 xJohn claims due to the following reasons.
° We really cant test the strength of $OP tokens if they all sit in the wallet without interractions with other dex and cex.
° $OP token needs a heavy marketcap that way it attracts investors and the attraction we actually need it to gain. This attraction helps to not only grow the $OP tokens but also creates awarenesses of the projects built within yhe optimism ecosystem
° Advanced interractions:
Most users (from research so far) would probably have less funds to interract with other dexes within the optimisim ecosystem, and might deem it fit to also swap so that they get aquinted with other unused(uninterracted) projects living in the optimism ecosystem.
° In summary as a crypto evangelist I swore to help build and promote justice wherever the need be and by doing so I believe 0 xJohn claims should be counted void since it would counter the decentralization which Optimism as a community tends to promote.
The post discusses a proposal made by a user named 0xJohn suggesting that individuals who sold the initial OP airdrop should be disqualified from receiving future airdrops. The author argues against this proposal, citing the importance of token interactions for market strength, attracting investors, creating awareness, and promoting advanced interactions within the Optimism ecosystem. They believe that enforcing the proposal would go against the principles of decentralization that Optimism aims to uphold.
0 xJohn made a proposal here Users who sold the initial OP airdrop should become ineligible for all…
0 xJohn made a proposal here Users who sold the initial OP airdrop should become ineligible for all future airdrops making a proposal that “Users who sold the initial OP airdrop should become ineligible for all future airdrops”
Please i would start by saying that the crypto space and i believe Optimism comprises of a Decentralized ecosystem 'What is decentralization?
In blockchain, decentralization refers to the transfer of control and decision-making from a centralized entity (individual, organization, or group thereof) to a distributed network"
I would like to counter the 0 xJohn claims due to the following reasons.
° We really cant test the strength of $OP tokens if they all sit in the wallet without interractions with other dex and cex.
° $OP token needs a heavy marketcap that way it attracts investors and the attraction we actually need it to gain. This attraction helps to not only grow the $OP tokens but also creates awarenesses of the projects built within yhe optimism ecosystem
° Advanced interractions:
Most users (from research so far) would probably have less funds to interract with other dexes within the optimisim ecosystem, and might deem it fit to also swap so that they get aquinted with other unused(uninterracted) projects living in the optimism ecosystem.
° In summary as a crypto evangelist I swore to help build and promote justice wherever the need be and by doing so I believe 0 xJohn claims should be counted void since it would counter the decentralization which Optimism as a community tends to promote.
I support @Khrispyshots statement
Most users which are low on funds will definitely want to partici…
I support @Khrispyshots statement
Most users which are low on funds will definitely want to participate and interact with other dexes in the Optimistism Body.
Funds will be need to do so
I agree with you. It their token and they can do what ever they want, I read somewhere someone sayi…
I agree with you. It their token and they can do what ever they want, I read somewhere someone saying, imagine punishing Bitcoin seller who sold at sub $ 1 , price appreciation is best lesson for them.
That being said, I do want to see some action to those address that claimed the token before the official announcement. I am not sure If OP Team can do anything to the CEX allowing the users to trade breaking their agreement but they can and should do something about those address.
Ceazor: I took my airdrop and provided liquidity on Uniswap.
there are many ways to participate and explore. I get that people that needed the cash are what we in the space call “hungry” and the whales that don’t care about the airdrop are less likely to participate in anything other than providing liquidity.
however, there are also the airdrop hunters that will do nothing but collect, sell, and move on.
this is a good debate actually.
mteoptimism: OPUser:
ome action to those address that claimed the token before t
you’re the bosss. this is the punishment/ price appreciation.
I took my airdrop and provided liquidity on Uniswap.
there are many ways to participate and explore…
I took my airdrop and provided liquidity on Uniswap.
there are many ways to participate and explore. I get that people that needed the cash are what we in the space call “hungry” and the whales that don’t care about the airdrop are less likely to participate in anything other than providing liquidity.
however, there are also the airdrop hunters that will do nothing but collect, sell, and move on.
this is a good debate actually.
crypto policing has never been good , a strong project will always have users and attract other use…
crypto policing has never been good , a strong project will always have users and attract other users. paraswap did the policing now look at the price and number of users which has dwindled. how many people lost fortunes through luna . its nice to let people be.
in my country getting airdrops is a taxable event now if the price goes down i will owe tax on mone…
in my country getting airdrops is a taxable event now if the price goes down i will owe tax on money i dont have
blackbus: Yeah this is the same for me. I was sort of hoping for a dump before the public start buying in because I want to minimise my tax obligation but also keep my OP tokens. I thought about waiting until the new financial year (July) to claim but if it pumps a lot then I would need to need to liquidate a third straight away to pay to tax.
I support you Op will become valuable when airdrop claimers are dump their all coins
I support you Op will become valuable when airdrop claimers are dump their all coins
Hello,
Interesting proposal. I agree on the fact some humble wallet may have/want to sell OP cause …
Hello,
Interesting proposal. I agree on the fact some humble wallet may have/want to sell OP cause of their small financial ressources. But first it’s very difficult to discriminate between profit max or small wallet… The ideal would be to tackle this max profit issue and offer ways to small wallet to get ressources from their time spending without definitively selling : like a lend by staking OP ?
Cheers
0 xJohn made a proposal here Users who sold the initial OP airdrop should become ineligible for all…
0 xJohn made a proposal here Users who sold the initial OP airdrop should become ineligible for all future airdrops 62 making a proposal that “Users who sold the initial OP airdrop should become ineligible for all future airdrops” Please i would start by saying that the crypto space and i believe Optimism comprises of a Decentralized ecosystem 'What is decentralization? In blockchain, decentralization refers to the transfer of control and decision-making from a centralized entity (individual, organization, or group thereof) to a distributed network" I would like to counter the 0 xJohn claims due to the following reasons. ° We really cant test the strength of $OP tokens if they all sit in the wallet without interractions with other dex and cex. ° $OP token needs a heavy marketcap that way it attracts investors and the attraction we actually need it to gain. This attraction helps to not only grow the $OP tokens but also creates awarenesses of the projects built within yhe optimism ecosystem ° Advanced interractions: Most users (from research so far) would probably have less funds to interract with other dexes within the optimisim ecosystem, and might deem it fit to also swap so that they get aquinted with other unused(uninterracted) projects living in the optimism ecosystem. ° In summary as a crypto evangelist I swore to help build and promote justice wherever the need be and by doing so I believe 0 xJohn claims should be counted void since it would counter the decentralization which Optimism as a community tends to promote.
Yeah, I’m with you on this one. I’d be ok with some sort of drop bonus for those holding X amount o…
Yeah, I’m with you on this one. I’d be ok with some sort of drop bonus for those holding X amount of OP on average between drops, as long as it’s not a continuous hold - trading is a good thing.
Good idea about incentives people to hold (like getter a better yield through holding), we should n…
Good idea about incentives people to hold (like getter a better yield through holding), we should not forget that those people who get the airdrop are likely to be people who wanted to try optimism :wink:
I do support your proposal. Crypto is about permissionlessness and decentralization, so the idea of…
I do support your proposal. Crypto is about permissionlessness and decentralization, so the idea of punishing the users for their legal decisions is wrong. If the users were selected for the airdrop, they contributed to the Optimism growth and not vice versa.
If the OP team were interested in keeping the price of the $OP token by every means, they could have made vesting for the Airdrop- 1 , or found other solutions.
Interesting dilema,
worth a debate for sure.
For me it should not be about punishing people that us…
Interesting dilema,
worth a debate for sure.
For me it should not be about punishing people that use their free will to sell their airdrop,
but more about incentivising hodl’ers and stakers that support the network by not dumping, I’m sure this will be calculated into future airdrops.
I’m personally not planning on selling anything. an investment in the future :wink:
I’m in favor of this. People sell for many different reasons and it’s not our business what they do…
I’m in favor of this. People sell for many different reasons and it’s not our business what they do with them once they’ve claimed.
If it’s in their wallet, it’s their property, that’s the whole point of web 3
Also I don’t like one of the first proposals to be put forward after the drop has the intention of excluding others. This sends the wrong signal to the community
I support @Khrispyshots statement Most users which are low on funds will definitely want to partici…
I support @Khrispyshots statement Most users which are low on funds will definitely want to participate and interact with other dexes in the Optimistism Body. Funds will be need to do so
Support! Network must be tested.
Punish for selling airdrop tokens - not the way how it should be d…
Support! Network must be tested.
Punish for selling airdrop tokens - not the way how it should be done!
I agree with you. It their token and they can do what ever they want, I read somewhere someone sayi…
I agree with you. It their token and they can do what ever they want, I read somewhere someone saying, imagine punishing Bitcoin seller who sold at sub $ 1 , price appreciation is best lesson for them. That being said, I do want to see some action to those address that claimed the token before the official announcement. I am not sure If OP Team can do anything to the CEX allowing the users to trade breaking their agreement but they can and should do something about those address.
Ceazor: I took my airdrop and provided liquidity on Uniswap.
there are many ways to participate and explore. I get that people that needed the cash are what we in the space call “hungry” and the whales that don’t care about the airdrop are less likely to participate in anything other than providing liquidity.
however, there are also the airdrop hunters that will do nothing but collect, sell, and move on.
this is a good debate actually.
mteoptimism: OPUser:
ome action to those address that claimed the token before t
you’re the bosss. this is the punishment/ price appreciation.
I agree with the sentiment, but I think we should adopt a more nuanced approach to this.
We cannot …
I agree with the sentiment, but I think we should adopt a more nuanced approach to this.
We cannot just ban people for selling tokens that were gifted to them. What we can do is adjust incentive programs to reward $OP holders more. Token prices appreciate based on demand, and not by bans.
I know other L 2 s and protocols will learn from these insta-dumps and how we react to the situation.
I took my airdrop and provided liquidity on Uniswap. there are many ways to participate and explore…
I took my airdrop and provided liquidity on Uniswap. there are many ways to participate and explore. I get that people that needed the cash are what we in the space call “hungry” and the whales that don’t care about the airdrop are less likely to participate in anything other than providing liquidity. however, there are also the airdrop hunters that will do nothing but collect, sell, and move on. this is a good debate actually.
crypto policing has never been good , a strong project will always have users and attract other use…
crypto policing has never been good , a strong project will always have users and attract other users. paraswap did the policing now look at the price and number of users which has dwindled. how many people lost fortunes through luna . its nice to let people be.
in my country getting airdrops is a taxable event now if the price goes down i will owe tax on mone…
in my country getting airdrops is a taxable event now if the price goes down i will owe tax on money i dont have
blackbus: Yeah this is the same for me. I was sort of hoping for a dump before the public start buying in because I want to minimise my tax obligation but also keep my OP tokens. I thought about waiting until the new financial year (July) to claim but if it pumps a lot then I would need to need to liquidate a third straight away to pay to tax.
I support you Op will become valuable when airdrop claimers are dump their all coins
I support you Op will become valuable when airdrop claimers are dump their all coins
Hello, Interesting proposal. I agree on the fact some humble wallet may have/want to sell OP cause …
Hello, Interesting proposal. I agree on the fact some humble wallet may have/want to sell OP cause of their small financial ressources. But first it’s very difficult to discriminate between profit max or small wallet… The ideal would be to tackle this max profit issue and offer ways to small wallet to get ressources from their time spending without definitively selling : like a lend by staking OP ? Cheers
Yeah, I’m with you on this one. I’d be ok with some sort of drop bonus for those holding X amount o…
Yeah, I’m with you on this one. I’d be ok with some sort of drop bonus for those holding X amount of OP on average between drops, as long as it’s not a continuous hold - trading is a good thing.
Good idea about incentives people to hold (like getter a better yield through holding), we should n…
Good idea about incentives people to hold (like getter a better yield through holding), we should not forget that those people who get the airdrop are likely to be people who wanted to try optimism :wink:
I do support your proposal. Crypto is about permissionlessness and decentralization, so the idea of…
I do support your proposal. Crypto is about permissionlessness and decentralization, so the idea of punishing the users for their legal decisions is wrong. If the users were selected for the airdrop, they contributed to the Optimism growth and not vice versa. If the OP team were interested in keeping the price of the $OP token by every means, they could have made vesting for the Airdrop- 1 , or found other solutions.
Interesting dilema, worth a debate for sure. For me it should not be about punishing people that us…
Interesting dilema, worth a debate for sure. For me it should not be about punishing people that use their free will to sell their airdrop, but more about incentivising hodl’ers and stakers that support the network by not dumping, I’m sure this will be calculated into future airdrops. I’m personally not planning on selling anything. an investment in the future :wink:
I’m in favor of this. People sell for many different reasons and it’s not our business what they do…
I’m in favor of this. People sell for many different reasons and it’s not our business what they do with them once they’ve claimed. If it’s in their wallet, it’s their property, that’s the whole point of web 3 Also I don’t like one of the first proposals to be put forward after the drop has the intention of excluding others. This sends the wrong signal to the community
These people should not be punished especially if they are active optimism users. I would understa…
These people should not be punished especially if they are active optimism users. I would understand if they sell off and aren’t optimism users, but the only people this really hurts is the poor. People that already have money have no need to sell. It is a terrible idea to implement an action that overwhelmingly negatively impacts the poor.
Rich people have no need to sell while poor people are basically forced to sell.
Support! Network must be tested. Punish for selling airdrop tokens - not the way how it should be d…
Support! Network must be tested. Punish for selling airdrop tokens - not the way how it should be done!
I agree with the sentiment, but I think we should adopt a more nuanced approach to this. We cannot …
I agree with the sentiment, but I think we should adopt a more nuanced approach to this. We cannot just ban people for selling tokens that were gifted to them. What we can do is adjust incentive programs to reward $OP holders more. Token prices appreciate based on demand, and not by bans. I know other L 2 s and protocols will learn from these insta-dumps and how we react to the situation.
These people should not be punished especially if they are active optimism users. I would understa…
These people should not be punished especially if they are active optimism users. I would understand if they sell off and aren’t optimism users, but the only people this really hurts is the poor. People that already have money have no need to sell. It is a terrible idea to implement an action that overwhelmingly negatively impacts the poor. Rich people have no need to sell while poor people are basically forced to sell.
I agree completely. Perhaps it makes sense to give a slight reward for holding, but bear in mind ma…
I agree completely. Perhaps it makes sense to give a slight reward for holding, but bear in mind many people are struggling financially and those who can afford to hold likely are not in that category.
Also in many countries, airdrops are taxable events. Someone could get theoretically punished financially if the token struggles to reach a decent price as they will have to pay taxes on the initial drop, but may not have any realized gains.
As a first cycler, I am very happy to get my first optimism airdrop, but it’s also a brutal Bear market with no end in sight. I have sold a little less than half of my airdrop, but kept all my funds on optimism. I think if the team is considering excluding sellers from future drops, they should prioritize people who moved their funds immediately off chain first.
I am extremely excited to keep using Optimism especially now that I have real funds to participate with on chain. However, if Optimism takes a harsh stance against people who had to sell out of financial necessity, I will seriously rethink that position.
I believe both proposals have a point. But what we should focus on should be about how Optimisim an…
I believe both proposals have a point. But what we should focus on should be about how Optimisim and $op holders should benefit. My idea is…
“In order to benefit upcoming $op airdrops and other events, you must hold at least as much as $op you had been awarded before”. So by this way, we give chance to sellers become optimist back again and show that we don’t care the ones who doesn’t care us. This can only add value to $op and it is a fair way, no punishing but only rewarding.
What do you think?
I agree completely. Perhaps it makes sense to give a slight reward for holding, but bear in mind ma…
I agree completely. Perhaps it makes sense to give a slight reward for holding, but bear in mind many people are struggling financially and those who can afford to hold likely are not in that category. Also in many countries, airdrops are taxable events. Someone could get theoretically punished financially if the token struggles to reach a decent price as they will have to pay taxes on the initial drop, but may not have any realized gains. As a first cycler, I am very happy to get my first optimism airdrop, but it’s also a brutal Bear market with no end in sight. I have sold a little less than half of my airdrop, but kept all my funds on optimism. I think if the team is considering excluding sellers from future drops, they should prioritize people who moved their funds immediately off chain first. I am extremely excited to keep using Optimism especially now that I have real funds to participate with on chain. However, if Optimism takes a harsh stance against people who had to sell out of financial necessity, I will seriously rethink that position.
I believe both proposals have a point. But what we should focus on should be about how Optimisim an…
I believe both proposals have a point. But what we should focus on should be about how Optimisim and $op holders should benefit. My idea is… “In order to benefit upcoming $op airdrops and other events, you must hold at least as much as $op you had been awarded before”. So by this way, we give chance to sellers become optimist back again and show that we don’t care the ones who doesn’t care us. This can only add value to $op and it is a fair way, no punishing but only rewarding. What do you think?
Yeah, even i’m not selling any $OP in my wallet, i still think that people should be able to sell t…
Yeah, even i’m not selling any $OP in my wallet, i still think that people should be able to sell their token. but $OP should have something to incentive people to encourage them not to sell instead.
Yeah, even i’m not selling any $OP in my wallet, i still think that people should be able to sell t…
Yeah, even i’m not selling any $OP in my wallet, i still think that people should be able to sell their token. but $OP should have something to incentive people to encourage them not to sell instead.
Yeah this is the same for me. I was sort of hoping for a dump before the public start buying in bec…
Yeah this is the same for me. I was sort of hoping for a dump before the public start buying in because I want to minimise my tax obligation but also keep my OP tokens. I thought about waiting until the new financial year (July) to claim but if it pumps a lot then I would need to need to liquidate a third straight away to pay to tax.
I respect your position and I agree that there is nothing wrong with those people who ditched up to…
I respect your position and I agree that there is nothing wrong with those people who ditched up to 100 % of their op, but if you have to be realistic in those cases, for example, that clearly the proposal of this new innovative system does not It is not interesting at all and I do not see anything wrong, specifically in that case, that they are not considered eligible for another airdrop, what is more, there have been posts about what this project is about and what the purposes are clearly and I repeat again, in the most extreme cases where it was sold until I would say 80 %, from my point of view they are only interested in the money and I do not harm it
Yeah this is the same for me. I was sort of hoping for a dump before the public start buying in bec…
Yeah this is the same for me. I was sort of hoping for a dump before the public start buying in because I want to minimise my tax obligation but also keep my OP tokens. I thought about waiting until the new financial year (July) to claim but if it pumps a lot then I would need to need to liquidate a third straight away to pay to tax.
I respect your position and I agree that there is nothing wrong with those people who ditched up to…
I respect your position and I agree that there is nothing wrong with those people who ditched up to 100 % of their op, but if you have to be realistic in those cases, for example, that clearly the proposal of this new innovative system does not It is not interesting at all and I do not see anything wrong, specifically in that case, that they are not considered eligible for another airdrop, what is more, there have been posts about what this project is about and what the purposes are clearly and I repeat again, in the most extreme cases where it was sold until I would say 80 %, from my point of view they are only interested in the money and I do not harm it
what is a token when it cant be traded? there should be staking to keep people from selling
what is a token when it cant be traded? there should be staking to keep people from selling
If we don’t want the token traded, then it should be locked to the user or vested. Retroactive puni…
If we don’t want the token traded, then it should be locked to the user or vested. Retroactive punishments based on subjective measures of “too much selling” are not the answer.
Who is saying that all the OP tokens should sit in the wallet? The original argument states that pe…
Who is saying that all the OP tokens should sit in the wallet? The original argument states that people who sold their airdrop immediately after receiving it should be held accountable. I don’t know what you are objecting with these, but it is certainly not the initial proposal by 0 xJohn.
In blockchain, decentralization refers to the transfer of control and decision-making from a centralized entity (individual, organization, or group thereof) to a distributed network
So, can’t people decide to limit the participation of others if they are taking potentially harmful actions for the overall community? Should everything be allowed to pass as long as it is doable within the defined rules of the system?
Regardless of their intentions or needs, accounts mentioned in the original post did abuse the collective by their actions, should we allow them to not only get away with this, but also continue to gain more?
Also even if we accept that somebody is entitled to use their “free will” to hit you, then they should not object you using your free will to hit back at them.
what is a token when it cant be traded? there should be staking to keep people from selling
what is a token when it cant be traded? there should be staking to keep people from selling
If we don’t want the token traded, then it should be locked to the user or vested. Retroactive puni…
If we don’t want the token traded, then it should be locked to the user or vested. Retroactive punishments based on subjective measures of “too much selling” are not the answer.
Who is saying that all the OP tokens should sit in the wallet? The original argument states that pe…
Who is saying that all the OP tokens should sit in the wallet? The original argument states that people who sold their airdrop immediately after receiving it should be held accountable. I don’t know what you are objecting with these, but it is certainly not the initial proposal by 0 xJohn. In blockchain, decentralization refers to the transfer of control and decision-making from a centralized entity (individual, organization, or group thereof) to a distributed network So, can’t people decide to limit the participation of others if they are taking potentially harmful actions for the overall community? Should everything be allowed to pass as long as it is doable within the defined rules of the system? Regardless of their intentions or needs, accounts mentioned in the original post did abuse the collective by their actions, should we allow them to not only get away with this, but also continue to gain more? Also even if we accept that somebody is entitled to use their “free will” to hit you, then they should not object you using your free will to hit back at them.
I support your proposal. Crypto is decentralized and people’s actions with tokens in their wallets …
I support your proposal. Crypto is decentralized and people’s actions with tokens in their wallets shouldn’t be policed
I support your proposal. Crypto is decentralized and people’s actions with tokens in their wallets …
I support your proposal. Crypto is decentralized and people’s actions with tokens in their wallets shouldn’t be policed
Agree with this statement. Op$ should be moved to interact with the ecosystem better than standstil…
Agree with this statement. Op$ should be moved to interact with the ecosystem better than standstill.
The cost of something is what you give up to get as mentioned by adam smith. I agreed to your count…
The cost of something is what you give up to get as mentioned by adam smith. I agreed to your counter as we should seek the strength of OP token. In my opinion sellers should be eligible again, but to avoid overbearing in large wallet sellers, I would suggest to lower down their rewards.
Agree with this statement. Op$ should be moved to interact with the ecosystem better than standstil…
Agree with this statement. Op$ should be moved to interact with the ecosystem better than standstill.
The cost of something is what you give up to get as mentioned by adam smith. I agreed to your count…
The cost of something is what you give up to get as mentioned by adam smith. I agreed to your counter as we should seek the strength of OP token. In my opinion sellers should be eligible again, but to avoid overbearing in large wallet sellers, I would suggest to lower down their rewards.
I never attacked aanyone im also using my freewill too.
Thanks for your opinion :blush:
I never attacked aanyone im also using my freewill too.
Thanks for your opinion :blush:
I never attacked aanyone im also using my freewill too. Thanks for your opinion :blush:
I never attacked aanyone im also using my freewill too. Thanks for your opinion :blush:
I can’t agree.
It’s not about forbiding people to sell. It’s much about giving incentive to people …
I can’t agree.
It’s not about forbiding people to sell. It’s much about giving incentive to people that really care.
What is the point of giving further OP rewards to people who just come here each to claim and dump on people who participate on the ecosystem anyway. Would be the same as giving BTC as a reward for each block to people that do not mine.
We need actors, and we need to reward them. And if people just want to profit, fine!
But let’s not give them more free reward then.
We don’t create LP for people to just come here and serve themselves for free.
Either u here actively, or not and u don’t have rewards that’s how I see things.
So I’m not for this proposal
I can’t agree. It’s not about forbiding people to sell. It’s much about giving incentive to people …
I can’t agree. It’s not about forbiding people to sell. It’s much about giving incentive to people that really care. What is the point of giving further OP rewards to people who just come here each to claim and dump on people who participate on the ecosystem anyway. Would be the same as giving BTC as a reward for each block to people that do not mine. We need actors, and we need to reward them. And if people just want to profit, fine! But let’s not give them more free reward then. We don’t create LP for people to just come here and serve themselves for free. Either u here actively, or not and u don’t have rewards that’s how I see things. So I’m not for this proposal
OPUser:
ome action to those address that claimed the token before t
you’re the bosss. this i…
OPUser:
ome action to those address that claimed the token before t
you’re the bosss. this is the punishment/ price appreciation.
OPUser: ome action to those address that claimed the token before t you’re the bosss. this i…
OPUser: ome action to those address that claimed the token before t you’re the bosss. this is the punishment/ price appreciation.
I replied to the original thread before I seen this one. My thoughts are that those accounts that Q…
I replied to the original thread before I seen this one. My thoughts are that those accounts that QUICKLY sold and then bridged out should be disqualified but accounts that sold to interact with the ecosystem i.e quests, liquidity etc… should qualify because these individuals are the core community. It really says a lot when a small account doesn’t take an decent airdrop and run with it but keeps the liquidity within the ecosystem. Maybe setting a small threshold like keeping 10 OP to participate in gov would make sense but disqualifying sellers is the most ridiculous thing I’ve seen on this forum and frankly if this happens it would set a scary standard. I don’t want to participate in a community that punishes sellers.
I replied to the original thread before I seen this one. My thoughts are that those accounts that Q…
I replied to the original thread before I seen this one. My thoughts are that those accounts that QUICKLY sold and then bridged out should be disqualified but accounts that sold to interact with the ecosystem i.e quests, liquidity etc… should qualify because these individuals are the core community. It really says a lot when a small account doesn’t take an decent airdrop and run with it but keeps the liquidity within the ecosystem. Maybe setting a small threshold like keeping 10 OP to participate in gov would make sense but disqualifying sellers is the most ridiculous thing I’ve seen on this forum and frankly if this happens it would set a scary standard. I don’t want to participate in a community that punishes sellers.
Yess Indeed, good arguments. But what i will ad to that is, collective order can only come from fre…
Yess Indeed, good arguments. But what i will ad to that is, collective order can only come from free will.
Not pushing people into one direction. Maybe give them a incentive to go towards a certain goal, but the structure needs to be self relaying in order to preduce max value for the entire community. Mistakes will be made and that is what will push the eco system to be more stronger and better versions. At least in nature is does. I Do not have a solution yet for this.
Yess Indeed, good arguments. But what i will ad to that is, collective order can only come from fre…
Yess Indeed, good arguments. But what i will ad to that is, collective order can only come from free will. Not pushing people into one direction. Maybe give them a incentive to go towards a certain goal, but the structure needs to be self relaying in order to preduce max value for the entire community. Mistakes will be made and that is what will push the eco system to be more stronger and better versions. At least in nature is does. I Do not have a solution yet for this.
I think you should rewards ecosystem users and you shouldn’t exclude OP sellers. Since it is not ma…
I think you should rewards ecosystem users and you shouldn’t exclude OP sellers. Since it is not mandatory to hold the OP-tokens for an airdrop. This way you could exclude ecosystem users and rewards airdropped participants who don’t use the chain in the bear market. The bear market participants should be rewarded for their risk appetite. These users will always try out new protocols/dapps/blockchains and they will have an important user experience feedback eventually.
I think you should rewards ecosystem users and you shouldn’t exclude OP sellers. Since it is not ma…
I think you should rewards ecosystem users and you shouldn’t exclude OP sellers. Since it is not mandatory to hold the OP-tokens for an airdrop. This way you could exclude ecosystem users and rewards airdropped participants who don’t use the chain in the bear market. The bear market participants should be rewarded for their risk appetite. These users will always try out new protocols/dapps/blockchains and they will have an important user experience feedback eventually.
