With 1 , 594 applicants for RetroPGF 3 , there was a need to run an Application Review Process whereby anyone could submit a report for an application that is in violation of RetroPGF Application Rules. Over 1 , 000 applications were reported for violating the Application Rules.
40 badgeholders participated in reviewing these reports and decided if an application is in violation of the Application Rules, these reviews took place between October 23 rd - November 1 st. For a full overview of the review process see the Application Review Process forum post.
Appeals Process Overview
The full list of applications that were found to be in violation of the Application Rules, and are due to be excluded from participating in RetroPGF 3 , has been published here.
If you believe your application has been wrongfully excluded, and is not in violation of the Application Rules, you can file an appeal by November 3 rd at 8 pm UTC by using this form. (Note: you cannot edit your application during this period, only request reviewers take another pass at the content of your application as is).
All appeals will be reviewed by an additional set of Badgeholder Reviewers, who will reassess applications based on the appeal. This review will conclude on November 5 th at 8 pm UTC.
Should you have any questions regarding this process, feel free to share your comments in the #retropogf-discussion channel in Discord.
Over 1,000 applications out of 1,594 for RetroPGF 3 were reported for violating the application rules. 40 badgeholders reviewed these reports between October 23rd-November 1st. A list of excluded applications was published, and applicants can appeal by November 3rd. Additional Badgeholder Reviewers will reassess appeals by November 5th. Questions can be addressed in the dedicated Discord channel.
With 1 , 594 applicants for RetroPGF 3 , there was a need to run an Application Review Process …
With 1 , 594 applicants for RetroPGF 3 , there was a need to run an Application Review Process 59 whereby anyone could submit a report for an application that is in violation of RetroPGF Application Rules 21 . Over 1 , 000 applications were reported for violating the Application Rules.
40 badgeholders participated in reviewing these reports and decided if an application is in violation of the Application Rules, these reviews took place between October 23 rd - November 1 st. For a full overview of the review process see the Application Review Process 59 forum post.
Appeals Process Overview
The full list of applications that were found to be in violation of the Application Rules, and are due to be excluded from participating in RetroPGF 3 , has been published here 128 .
If you believe your application has been wrongfully excluded, and is not in violation of the Application Rules, you can file an appeal by November 3 rd at 8 pm UTC by using this 91 form. (Note: you cannot edit your application during this period, only request reviewers take another pass at the content of your application as is).
All appeals will be reviewed by an additional set of Badgeholder Reviewers, who will reassess applications based on the appeal. This review will conclude on November 5 th at 8 pm UTC.
Should you have any questions regarding this process, feel free to share your comments in the #retropogf-discussion 7 channel in Discord 5 .
With 1 , 594 applicants for RetroPGF 3 , there was a need to run an Application Review Process …
With 1 , 594 applicants for RetroPGF 3 , there was a need to run an Application Review Process 59 whereby anyone could submit a report for an application that is in violation of RetroPGF Application Rules 21 . Over 1 , 000 applications were reported for violating the Application Rules. 40 badgeholders participated in reviewing these reports and decided if an application is in violation of the Application Rules, these reviews took place between October 23 rd - November 1 st. For a full overview of the review process see the Application Review Process 59 forum post. Appeals Process Overview The full list of applications that were found to be in violation of the Application Rules, and are due to be excluded from participating in RetroPGF 3 , has been published here 126 . If you believe your application has been wrongfully excluded, and is not in violation of the Application Rules, you can file an appeal by November 3 rd at 8 pm UTC by using this 91 form. (Note: you cannot edit your application during this period, only request reviewers take another pass at the content of your application as is). All appeals will be reviewed by an additional set of Badgeholder Reviewers, who will reassess applications based on the appeal. This review will conclude on November 5 th at 8 pm UTC. Should you have any questions regarding this process, feel free to share your comments in the #retropogf-discussion 7 channel in Discord 5 .
Hey everyone, I noticed that some projects that were denied do not have clarity on why they were re…
Hey everyone, I noticed that some projects that were denied do not have clarity on why they were removed.
As someone that is also a badgeholder in this round, i know this is a lot to ask, but maybe the projects that were denied should receive at least some kind of clarity, especially because, for an appeal, its necessary to answer “why the project was removed and why it should be reviewed again”.
nanobro: Agree with this. It’s really important to know the mistake.
cush: Hey @JoaoKury, thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. We do have the list @Chain_L shared above, which shares at least a high level reason for the report. Unfortunately, not everyone submitted a description for their report (even when we implemented it as a required field, people would just input “.”).
Once we wrap up the appeals, we’re going to be posting a request for feedback on the process and would love to explore how we can improve on the reviews for future rounds.
Hey everyone, I noticed that some projects that were denied do not have clarity on why they were re…
Hey everyone, I noticed that some projects that were denied do not have clarity on why they were removed. As someone that is also a badgeholder in this round, i know this is a lot to ask, but maybe the projects that were denied should receive at least some kind of clarity, especially because, for an appeal, its necessary to answer “why the project was removed and why it should be reviewed again”.
nanobro: Agree with this. It’s really important to know the mistake.
cush: Hey @JoaoKury, thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. We do have the list @Chain_L shared above, which shares at least a high level reason for the report. Unfortunately, not everyone submitted a description for their report (even when we implemented it as a required field, people would just input “.”).
Once we wrap up the appeals, we’re going to be posting a request for feedback on the process and would love to explore how we can improve on the reviews for future rounds.
Drafting comprehensive rejection reviews for each application may pose a significant challenge. How…
Drafting comprehensive rejection reviews for each application may pose a significant challenge. However, the high-level rationales provided in this document can serve as a valuable resource for projects when considering appeals.
docs.google.com
RetroPGF Application Review
Dashboard
Review Periods
Round 1 ( 24 th Oct- 28 th Oct),Round 2 ( 29 th Oct- 1 st Nov),Appeals ( 4 th- 5 th Nov)
Sheet Breakdown,Sheet Breakdown,Sheet...
Gonna.eth: I Agree here. It took long enough to review them all and I agree with the reports. Most of what I voted to be removed talks about future impact, users thinking their activity in Optimism is enough to participate, and spam.
Drafting comprehensive rejection reviews for each application may pose a significant challenge. How…
Drafting comprehensive rejection reviews for each application may pose a significant challenge. However, the high-level rationales provided in this document can serve as a valuable resource for projects when considering appeals.
docs.google.com
RetroPGF Application Review 40
Dashboard
Review Periods
Round 1 ( 24 th Oct- 28 th Oct),Round 2 ( 29 th Oct- 1 st Nov),Appeals ( 4 th- 5 th Nov)
Sheet Breakdown,Sheet Breakdown,Sheet...
Gonna.eth: I Agree here. It took long enough to review them all and I agree with the reports. Most of what I voted to be removed talks about future impact, users thinking their activity in Optimism is enough to participate, and spam.
Hey @JoaoKury, thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. We do have the list @Chain_L shared above,…
Hey @JoaoKury, thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. We do have the list @Chain_L shared above, which shares at least a high level reason for the report. Unfortunately, not everyone submitted a description for their report (even when we implemented it as a required field, people would just input “.”).
Once we wrap up the appeals, we’re going to be posting a request for feedback on the process and would love to explore how we can improve on the reviews for future rounds.
Drafting comprehensive rejection reviews for each application may pose a significant challenge. How…
Drafting comprehensive rejection reviews for each application may pose a significant challenge. However, the high-level rationales provided in this document can serve as a valuable resource for projects when considering appeals. docs.google.com RetroPGF Application Review 40 Dashboard Review Periods Round 1 ( 24 th Oct- 28 th Oct),Round 2 ( 29 th Oct- 1 st Nov),Appeals ( 4 th- 5 th Nov) Sheet Breakdown,Sheet Breakdown,Sheet...
Gonna.eth: I Agree here. It took long enough to review them all and I agree with the reports. Most of what I voted to be removed talks about future impact, users thinking their activity in Optimism is enough to participate, and spam.
I Agree here. It took long enough to review them all and I agree with the reports. Most of what I v…
I Agree here. It took long enough to review them all and I agree with the reports. Most of what I voted to be removed talks about future impact, users thinking their activity in Optimism is enough to participate, and spam.
You are correct, but I do not agree that the project should be removed simply because income was no…
You are correct, but I do not agree that the project should be removed simply because income was not stated, and it should be stated that the project statistics are false, while PDFs were offered with every order.
I simply and in a hurry missed the information about what needs to be indicated and the income of the project, I thought that only financing was needed, and for such a mistake, the project was eliminated!
I think it’s great. And very intuitive. So my application was rejected and before i’ve submitted it…
I think it’s great. And very intuitive. So my application was rejected and before i’ve submitted it i knew that it was going to be, i think that i’ve made a huge effort to write it, maybe we can think how this work also counts. Haha =), but the Sheet it’s enough to understand why the decision were made and it’s great how they are working. Congratz with this great effort and time to anser.
Hey @JoaoKury, thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. We do have the list @Chain_L shared above,…
Hey @JoaoKury, thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. We do have the list @Chain_L shared above, which shares at least a high level reason for the report. Unfortunately, not everyone submitted a description for their report (even when we implemented it as a required field, people would just input “.”). Once we wrap up the appeals, we’re going to be posting a request for feedback on the process and would love to explore how we can improve on the reviews for future rounds.
I see a “Not sure this is in the scope of retropgf” as reason to reject and nothing else, it seems …
I see a “Not sure this is in the scope of retropgf” as reason to reject and nothing else, it seems a bit extreme for that to be considered in violation of the Application rules if “not sure”. I also understand that this is what the appeal process is for, so I don’t mind giving more context
I Agree here. It took long enough to review them all and I agree with the reports. Most of what I v…
I Agree here. It took long enough to review them all and I agree with the reports. Most of what I voted to be removed talks about future impact, users thinking their activity in Optimism is enough to participate, and spam.
You are correct, but I do not agree that the project should be removed simply because income was no…
You are correct, but I do not agree that the project should be removed simply because income was not stated, and it should be stated that the project statistics are false, while PDFs were offered with every order. I simply and in a hurry missed the information about what needs to be indicated and the income of the project, I thought that only financing was needed, and for such a mistake, the project was eliminated!
I think it’s great. And very intuitive. So my application was rejected and before i’ve submitted it…
I think it’s great. And very intuitive. So my application was rejected and before i’ve submitted it i knew that it was going to be, i think that i’ve made a huge effort to write it, maybe we can think how this work also counts. Haha =), but the Sheet it’s enough to understand why the decision were made and it’s great how they are working. Congratz with this great effort and time to anser.
Yes, Reject Reason:
“In their impact metrics they claim to have sold 40 items, but don’t list any…
Yes, Reject Reason:
“In their impact metrics they claim to have sold 40 items, but don’t list any revenue under funding sources”
Anyone doing a claim here, could you please mention your project name? I am interested in seeing wh…
Anyone doing a claim here, could you please mention your project name? I am interested in seeing what happened. @TiredEyes @xfede
I see a “Not sure this is in the scope of retropgf” as reason to reject and nothing else, it seems …
I see a “Not sure this is in the scope of retropgf” as reason to reject and nothing else, it seems a bit extreme for that to be considered in violation of the Application rules if “not sure”. I also understand that this is what the appeal process is for, so I don’t mind giving more context
Yes, Reject Reason: “In their impact metrics they claim to have sold 40 items, but don’t list any…
Yes, Reject Reason: “In their impact metrics they claim to have sold 40 items, but don’t list any revenue under funding sources”
Anyone doing a claim here, could you please mention your project name? I am interested in seeing wh…
Anyone doing a claim here, could you please mention your project name? I am interested in seeing what happened. @TiredEyes @xfede
Starting a debate for anyone that would like to join.
twitter.com
Avano 10
@Avano_io
Callin…
Starting a debate for anyone that would like to join.
twitter.com
Avano 10
@Avano_io
Calling out @optimismFND retropgf for how it decides "public good"? #publicgood washing, #realworld not really, #commons for one, #blockchain bias, #web 3 isn't actually decentralized, @CeloOrg funds more public good
12 : 19 PM - 5 Nov 2023
1
Starting a debate for anyone that would like to join.
twitter.com
Avano
@Avano_io
Calling out…
Starting a debate for anyone that would like to join.
twitter.com
Avano
@Avano_io
Calling out @optimismFND retropgf for how it decides "public good"? #publicgood washing, #realworld not really, #commons for one, #blockchain bias, #web 3 isn't actually decentralized, @CeloOrg funds more public good
12 : 19 PM - 5 Nov 2023
1
Dear Optimism team
I am Ronald, I am the owner of the 5758 MASTER project.
I found out why my app…
Dear Optimism team
I am Ronald, I am the owner of the 5758 MASTER project.
I found out why my application was deleted during the review period because I made a mistake by giving promises to IMPECT.
In fact, I don’t fully know what IMPECT is, so I just fill in what I can. After knowing that it is wrong and now I want to give an IMPECT answer according to my project which is 5758 MASTER.
Impact: providing broader insight to my community 5758 MASTER (Youtube & TELEGRAM) with the aim of providing a discussion that is easier to understand than what has been provided by Optimism or its ecosystem. I will make more detailed videos about existing projects or information that are easier for the community to understand so that it is easier for them to understand the information and updates that exist on Optimism.
5758 MASTER continues to provide educational videos & tutorials about optimism on the YouTube channel and shares via Twitter and Telegram, so that the community continues to get the latest information about optimism.
I am RONALD, the owner of YouTube 5758 MASTER which has 12 . 6 K followers, TELEGRAM 3 . 1 K followers & Twitter 400 followers. I want to make my social media platform a place for the community to find information and tutorials about optimism.
I have also made a special playlist for optimism which contains 8 videos. I often make informational videos and tutorials to interact with projects that are optimistic for my community.
This is my YouTube playlist link https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLe 2 UwSZfX 95 chj 2 YxiEFg 8 FMlH 9 pevuv 6 &si=eKgXMWGe 1 QfUwm 9 U 2
TELEGRAM Channel: Telegram: Contact @MASTER 5758 _LEGENDARY
I did not submit the OP Token value in RetroPGF 3 , I admitted that I had filled in a request for funds of 25000 - 50000 but I thought that was a requirement that had to be filled in, so I filled in that value which actually had no intention of asking for that value, that was my second mistake. To be honest, I just want to be part of RetroPGF 3 , whatever allocation 5758 Master gets is number 2 , the main thing is that I want to be part of OPTIMIST and be recognized through RetroPGF 3 for providing extensive insight and tutorials to my community and the optimism community.
I hope that RetroPGF 3 can be accepted so that I can get enthusiasm because I have become part of optimism.
Telegram DM: @MASTER_ 5758
Regards
Ronald | 5758 MASTERS
Thank You
Dear Optimism team
I am Ronald, I am the owner of the 5758 MASTER project.
I found out why my app…
Dear Optimism team
I am Ronald, I am the owner of the 5758 MASTER project.
I found out why my application was deleted during the review period because I made a mistake by giving promises to IMPECT.
In fact, I don’t fully know what IMPECT is, so I just fill in what I can. After knowing that it is wrong and now I want to give an IMPECT answer according to my project which is 5758 MASTER.
Impact: providing broader insight to my community 5758 MASTER (Youtube & TELEGRAM) with the aim of providing a discussion that is easier to understand than what has been provided by Optimism or its ecosystem. I will make more detailed videos about existing projects or information that are easier for the community to understand so that it is easier for them to understand the information and updates that exist on Optimism.
5758 MASTER continues to provide educational videos & tutorials about optimism on the YouTube channel and shares via Twitter and Telegram, so that the community continues to get the latest information about optimism.
I am RONALD, the owner of YouTube 5758 MASTER which has 12 . 6 K followers, TELEGRAM 3 . 1 K followers & Twitter 400 followers. I want to make my social media platform a place for the community to find information and tutorials about optimism.
I have also made a special playlist for optimism which contains 8 videos. I often make informational videos and tutorials to interact with projects that are optimistic for my community.
This is my YouTube playlist link https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLe 2 UwSZfX 95 chj 2 YxiEFg 8 FMlH 9 pevuv 6 &si=eKgXMWGe 1 QfUwm 9 U
TELEGRAM Channel: Telegram: Contact @MASTER 5758 _LEGENDARY
I did not submit the OP Token value in RetroPGF 3 , I admitted that I had filled in a request for funds of 25000 - 50000 but I thought that was a requirement that had to be filled in, so I filled in that value which actually had no intention of asking for that value, that was my second mistake. To be honest, I just want to be part of RetroPGF 3 , whatever allocation 5758 Master gets is number 2 , the main thing is that I want to be part of OPTIMIST and be recognized through RetroPGF 3 for providing extensive insight and tutorials to my community and the optimism community.
I hope that RetroPGF 3 can be accepted so that I can get enthusiasm because I have become part of optimism.
Telegram DM: @MASTER_ 5758
Regards
Ronald | 5758 MASTERS
Thank You
inbestprogram.eth: apparently no, i got called SPAM… can you believe it? im basically the only quality spanish content creator explaining the technicalities behind the superchain the opstack, all the chains using this, we also covered onboarding people into the ecosistem, delegating, participating in grants, we covered the bedrock update with free tutorials, and i could just keep talking here! the point is that it is kinda rude to call someones effort SPAM when you could just state from the begining that content creators, tutorials or videos to oboard people into the OP ecosystem are not what the foundation wants for this specific PGF
Why was my appeal rejected, even though so many people visited my platform?
Why was my appeal rejected, even though so many people visited my platform?
Starting a debate for anyone that would like to join. twitter.com Avano 10 @Avano_io Callin…
Starting a debate for anyone that would like to join. twitter.com Avano 10 @Avano_io Calling out @optimismFND retropgf for how it decides "public good"? #publicgood washing, #realworld not really, #commons for one, #blockchain bias, #web 3 isn't actually decentralized, @CeloOrg funds more public good 12 : 19 PM - 5 Nov 2023 1
Dear Optimism team I am Ronald, I am the owner of the 5758 MASTER project. I found out why my app…
Dear Optimism team I am Ronald, I am the owner of the 5758 MASTER project. I found out why my application was deleted during the review period because I made a mistake by giving promises to IMPECT. In fact, I don’t fully know what IMPECT is, so I just fill in what I can. After knowing that it is wrong and now I want to give an IMPECT answer according to my project which is 5758 MASTER. Impact: providing broader insight to my community 5758 MASTER (Youtube & TELEGRAM) with the aim of providing a discussion that is easier to understand than what has been provided by Optimism or its ecosystem. I will make more detailed videos about existing projects or information that are easier for the community to understand so that it is easier for them to understand the information and updates that exist on Optimism. 5758 MASTER continues to provide educational videos & tutorials about optimism on the YouTube channel and shares via Twitter and Telegram, so that the community continues to get the latest information about optimism. I am RONALD, the owner of YouTube 5758 MASTER which has 12 . 6 K followers, TELEGRAM 3 . 1 K followers & Twitter 400 followers. I want to make my social media platform a place for the community to find information and tutorials about optimism. I have also made a special playlist for optimism which contains 8 videos. I often make informational videos and tutorials to interact with projects that are optimistic for my community. This is my YouTube playlist link https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLe 2 UwSZfX 95 chj 2 YxiEFg 8 FMlH 9 pevuv 6 &si=eKgXMWGe 1 QfUwm 9 U 2 TELEGRAM Channel: Telegram: Contact @MASTER 5758 _LEGENDARY I did not submit the OP Token value in RetroPGF 3 , I admitted that I had filled in a request for funds of 25000 - 50000 but I thought that was a requirement that had to be filled in, so I filled in that value which actually had no intention of asking for that value, that was my second mistake. To be honest, I just want to be part of RetroPGF 3 , whatever allocation 5758 Master gets is number 2 , the main thing is that I want to be part of OPTIMIST and be recognized through RetroPGF 3 for providing extensive insight and tutorials to my community and the optimism community. I hope that RetroPGF 3 can be accepted so that I can get enthusiasm because I have become part of optimism. Telegram DM: @MASTER_ 5758 Regards Ronald | 5758 MASTERS Thank You
InbestProgram: apparently no, i got called SPAM… can you believe it? im basically the only quality spanish content creator explaining the technicalities behind the superchain the opstack, all the chains using this, we also covered onboarding people into the ecosistem, delegating, participating in grants, we covered the bedrock update with free tutorials, and i could just keep talking here! the point is that it is kinda rude to call someones effort SPAM when you could just state from the begining that content creators, tutorials or videos to oboard people into the OP ecosystem are not what the foundation wants for this specific PGF
Why was my appeal rejected, even though so many people visited my platform?
Why was my appeal rejected, even though so many people visited my platform?
apparently no, i got called SPAM… can you believe it? im basically the only quality spanish content…
apparently no, i got called SPAM… can you believe it? im basically the only quality spanish content creator explaining the technicalities behind the superchain the opstack, all the chains using this, we also covered onboarding people into the ecosistem, delegating, participating in grants, we covered the bedrock update with free tutorials, and i could just keep talking here! the point is that it is kinda rude to call someones effort SPAM when you could just state from the begining that content creators, tutorials or videos to oboard people into the OP ecosystem are not what the foundation wants for this specific PGF
OPUser: Hey @inbestprogram.eth , glad you are here.
Would you mind providing the name of your project? This information would be beneficial for us to grasp the challenges, which, in turn, will contribute to enhancing the overall process.
I empathize with your frustration and wish to affirm that we, as a collective, are dedicated to streamlining the process and making it more inclusive.
If your project was not included in this current round, please don’t be disappointed, as RPGF is an ongoing process, and you can always submit your proposal in the next round. MIght I suggest, creating a tutorial vedio sharing your experience so far with RPGF:
danftz: I looked into the Google Spreadsheet where the appeals are processed, and it seems the outcome of your appeal was positive:
Hey @inbestprogram.eth , glad you are here.
Would you mind providing the name of your project? This…
Hey @inbestprogram.eth , glad you are here.
Would you mind providing the name of your project? This information would be beneficial for us to grasp the challenges, which, in turn, will contribute to enhancing the overall process.
I empathize with your frustration and wish to affirm that we, as a collective, are dedicated to streamlining the process and making it more inclusive.
If your project was not included in this current round, please don’t be disappointed, as RPGF is an ongoing process, and you can always submit your proposal in the next round. MIght I suggest, creating a tutorial vedio sharing your experience so far with RPGF:
inbestprogram.eth: I wasn’t sure were to post it, so i replied to your initial comment suggesting this video topic, i think it will meet your expectations! RetroPGF: [SPANISH] https://youtu.be/2ZEnT-QJuZ4?si=YCWZEwd6-2UVb2TC
I looked into the Google Spreadsheet where the appeals are processed, and it seems the outcome of y…
I looked into the Google Spreadsheet where the appeals are processed, and it seems the outcome of your appeal was positive:
Screenshot 2023 - 11 - 05 at 23 . 54 . 39850 × 260 9 . 62 KB
inbestprogram.eth: Hello! thanks for the good news! i just looked into it, i’m currently preparing a video explaining retro PGF in Spanish as @OPUser suggested, the main objectives of the program, how it works, how to properly apply and ill cover the launch call.
I looked into the Google Spreadsheet 5 where the appeals are processed, and it seems the outcome …
I looked into the Google Spreadsheet 5 where the appeals are processed, and it seems the outcome of your appeal was positive:
Screenshot 2023 - 11 - 05 at 23 . 54 . 39850 × 260 9 . 62 KB
inbestprogram.eth: Hello! thanks for the good news! i just looked into it, i’m currently preparing a video explaining retro PGF in Spanish as @OPUser suggested, the main objectives of the program, how it works, how to properly apply and ill cover the launch call.
see pgf content includes artists and content creators.
I’m confused about how to make a sentence, a…
see pgf content includes artists and content creators.
I’m confused about how to make a sentence, actually I’m quite influential in the crypto world, especially Indonesians.
I will even change my platform to education for L 2 and OP.
I’m really confused about what kind of creator.
OK, everything has passed and in the end I still wasn’t accepted
Hi, my application is in the name of “Derbygold.eth”. I filed appeal as well. I strongly believe th…
Hi, my application is in the name of “Derbygold.eth”. I filed appeal as well. I strongly believe the reviewers misread or overlooked a rule and applied it as a blanket ban. The RetroPGF rule states that no grants will be provided for transaction/bridging. It applies if any Bridge dapps had applied for grants. But, my application was all about educational meetup. I mentioned about transaction to prove my impact.
Having reviewed 1200 applications myself as a Senior Grants reviewer at Polygon, you can accept or reject my application, but it shouldn’t have gone misinterpreted…
FractalVisions: This is a bit confusing. You are wanting RetroPGF on Optimism for the grant review work you did with Polygon?
Derbygold.eth:
Having reviewed 1200 applications myself as a Senior Grants reviewer at Polygon, you can accept or reject my application, but it shouldn’t have gone misinterpreted…
apparently no, i got called SPAM… can you believe it? im basically the only quality spanish content…
apparently no, i got called SPAM… can you believe it? im basically the only quality spanish content creator explaining the technicalities behind the superchain the opstack, all the chains using this, we also covered onboarding people into the ecosistem, delegating, participating in grants, we covered the bedrock update with free tutorials, and i could just keep talking here! the point is that it is kinda rude to call someones effort SPAM when you could just state from the begining that content creators, tutorials or videos to oboard people into the OP ecosystem are not what the foundation wants for this specific PGF
OPUser: Hey @InbestProgram , glad you are here.
Would you mind providing the name of your project? This information would be beneficial for us to grasp the challenges, which, in turn, will contribute to enhancing the overall process.
I empathize with your frustration and wish to affirm that we, as a collective, are dedicated to streamlining the process and making it more inclusive.
If your project was not included in this current round, please don’t be disappointed, as RPGF is an ongoing process, and you can always submit your proposal in the next round. MIght I suggest, creating a tutorial vedio sharing your experience so far with RPGF:
danftz: I looked into the Google Spreadsheet where the appeals are processed, and it seems the outcome of your appeal was positive:
Hey @InbestProgram , glad you are here. Would you mind providing the name of your project? This inf…
Hey @InbestProgram , glad you are here. Would you mind providing the name of your project? This information would be beneficial for us to grasp the challenges, which, in turn, will contribute to enhancing the overall process. I empathize with your frustration and wish to affirm that we, as a collective, are dedicated to streamlining the process and making it more inclusive. If your project was not included in this current round, please don’t be disappointed, as RPGF is an ongoing process, and you can always submit your proposal in the next round. MIght I suggest, creating a tutorial vedio sharing your experience so far with RPGF:
InbestProgram: I wasn’t sure were to post it, so i replied to your initial comment suggesting this video topic, i think it will meet your expectations! RetroPGF: [SPANISH] https://youtu.be/2ZEnT-QJuZ4?si=YCWZEwd6-2UVb2TC
I looked into the Google Spreadsheet 5 where the appeals are processed, and it seems the outcome …
I looked into the Google Spreadsheet 5 where the appeals are processed, and it seems the outcome of your appeal was positive: Screenshot 2023 - 11 - 05 at 23 . 54 . 39850 × 260 9 . 62 KB
InbestProgram: Hello! thanks for the good news! i just looked into it, i’m currently preparing a video explaining retro PGF in Spanish as @OPUser suggested, the main objectives of the program, how it works, how to properly apply and ill cover the launch call.
see pgf content includes artists and content creators. I’m confused about how to make a sentence, a…
see pgf content includes artists and content creators. I’m confused about how to make a sentence, actually I’m quite influential in the crypto world, especially Indonesians. I will even change my platform to education for L 2 and OP. I’m really confused about what kind of creator. OK, everything has passed and in the end I still wasn’t accepted
Hi, my application is in the name of “Derbygold.eth”. I filed appeal as well. I strongly believe th…
Hi, my application is in the name of “Derbygold.eth”. I filed appeal as well. I strongly believe the reviewers misread or overlooked a rule and applied it as a blanket ban. The RetroPGF rule states that no grants will be provided for transaction/bridging. It applies if any Bridge dapps had applied for grants. But, my application was all about educational meetup. I mentioned about transaction to prove my impact. Having reviewed 1200 applications myself as a Senior Grants reviewer at Polygon, you can accept or reject my application, but it shouldn’t have gone misinterpreted…
FractalVisions: This is a bit confusing. You are wanting RetroPGF on Optimism for the grant review work you did with Polygon?
Derbygold.eth:
Having reviewed 1200 applications myself as a Senior Grants reviewer at Polygon, you can accept or reject my application, but it shouldn’t have gone misinterpreted…
It may be more engaging to have the conversation here on the forum instead of social media.
It may be more engaging to have the conversation here on the forum instead of social media.
This is a bit confusing. You are wanting RetroPGF on Optimism for the grant review work you did wit…
This is a bit confusing. You are wanting RetroPGF on Optimism for the grant review work you did with Polygon?
Derbygold.eth:
Having reviewed 1200 applications myself as a Senior Grants reviewer at Polygon, you can accept or reject my application, but it shouldn’t have gone misinterpreted…
lolz…no ser… The IRL In-person meetup was on Optimism where we imparted knowledge about OP. The gra…
lolz…no ser… The IRL In-person meetup was on Optimism where we imparted knowledge about OP. The grant request was for that. But my application was rejected erroneously due to a ambigous rule which was applied as a blanket ban by OP reviewers which i humbly request them to revisit.
Earlier, i worked with Polygon as a reviewer. I mentioned this to say that at tyms newbie reviewers do misinterpret few rules. Rules get misconstrued due to hurry or inexperience or ambiguity. It’s a learning process. Hope this helps.
It may be more engaging to have the conversation here on the forum instead of social media.
It may be more engaging to have the conversation here on the forum instead of social media.
This is a bit confusing. You are wanting RetroPGF on Optimism for the grant review work you did wit…
This is a bit confusing. You are wanting RetroPGF on Optimism for the grant review work you did with Polygon? Derbygold.eth: Having reviewed 1200 applications myself as a Senior Grants reviewer at Polygon, you can accept or reject my application, but it shouldn’t have gone misinterpreted…
lolz…no ser… The IRL In-person meetup was on Optimism where we imparted knowledge about OP. The gra…
lolz…no ser… The IRL In-person meetup was on Optimism where we imparted knowledge about OP. The grant request was for that. But my application was rejected erroneously due to a ambigous rule which was applied as a blanket ban by OP reviewers which i humbly request them to revisit. Earlier, i worked with Polygon as a reviewer. I mentioned this to say that at tyms newbie reviewers do misinterpret few rules. Rules get misconstrued due to hurry or inexperience or ambiguity. It’s a learning process. Hope this helps.
Hello! thanks for the good news! i just looked into it, i’m currently preparing a video explaining…
Hello! thanks for the good news! i just looked into it, i’m currently preparing a video explaining retro PGF in Spanish as @OPUser suggested, the main objectives of the program, how it works, how to properly apply and ill cover the launch call.
Hello! thanks for the good news! i just looked into it, i’m currently preparing a video explaining…
Hello! thanks for the good news! i just looked into it, i’m currently preparing a video explaining retro PGF in Spanish as @OPUser suggested, the main objectives of the program, how it works, how to properly apply and ill cover the launch call.
We have some inconsistences in our application and appelation process, because we showed all our ev…
We have some inconsistences in our application and appelation process, because we showed all our evidence about the Optimism Impact. Hope you can review our application: Inconsistencies in our RetroPGF 3 evaluation 1
It´s important for us to recognise our journey in the ecosystem.
We have some inconsistences in our application and appelation process, because we showed all our ev…
We have some inconsistences in our application and appelation process, because we showed all our evidence about the Optimism Impact. Hope you can review our application: Inconsistencies in our RetroPGF 3 evaluation It´s important for us to recognise our journey in the ecosystem.
just read through the sheet and wow this is fantastic work - thanks to badgeholders sifting through…
just read through the sheet and wow this is fantastic work - thanks to badgeholders sifting through all this stuff
I wasn’t sure were to post it, so i replied to your initial comment suggesting this video topic, i …
I wasn’t sure were to post it, so i replied to your initial comment suggesting this video topic, i think it will meet your expectations! :red_circle: RetroPGF: [SPANISH] https://youtu.be/ 2 ZEnT-QJuZ 4 ?si=YCWZEwd 6 - 2 UVb 2 TC 3
I’m watching the video, very good. Thank you for the contribution and above all creating content in…
I’m watching the video, very good. Thank you for the contribution and above all creating content in Spanish.
just read through the sheet and wow this is fantastic work - thanks to badgeholders sifting through…
just read through the sheet and wow this is fantastic work - thanks to badgeholders sifting through all this stuff
I wasn’t sure were to post it, so i replied to your initial comment suggesting this video topic, i …
I wasn’t sure were to post it, so i replied to your initial comment suggesting this video topic, i think it will meet your expectations! :red_circle: RetroPGF: [SPANISH] https://youtu.be/ 2 ZEnT-QJuZ 4 ?si=YCWZEwd 6 - 2 UVb 2 TC 3
I’m watching the video, very good. Thank you for the contribution and above all creating content in…
I’m watching the video, very good. Thank you for the contribution and above all creating content in Spanish.
Thank you for the feedback! Yes, the Spanish community is lacking this kind of information and tuto…
Thank you for the feedback! Yes, the Spanish community is lacking this kind of information and tutorials. As a native Spanish speaker, I found myself doing my research in English most of the time. I’m trying to fill the gap!
Thank you for the feedback! Yes, the Spanish community is lacking this kind of information and tuto…
Thank you for the feedback! Yes, the Spanish community is lacking this kind of information and tutorials. As a native Spanish speaker, I found myself doing my research in English most of the time. I’m trying to fill the gap!
inbestprogram.eth:
Thank you for the feedback! Yes, the Spanish community is lacking this kind…
inbestprogram.eth:
Thank you for the feedback! Yes, the Spanish community is lacking this kind of information and tutorials. As a native Spanish speaker, I found myself doing my research in English most of the time. I’m trying to fill the gap!
Hey friend, we can work together. I enjoyed your video i’m the champion of Nación Bankless, and i think you create a lot of value, come in to the podcast to spread the Optimistic Values :smiley:
InbestProgram: Thank you for the feedback! Yes, the Spanish community is lacking this kind of …
InbestProgram: Thank you for the feedback! Yes, the Spanish community is lacking this kind of information and tutorials. As a native Spanish speaker, I found myself doing my research in English most of the time. I’m trying to fill the gap! Hey friend, we can work together. I enjoyed your video i’m the champion of Nación Bankless, and i think you create a lot of value, come in to the podcast to spread the Optimistic Values :smiley:
