gm Optimism Collective :red_circle: :sparkles:
Last week was super active on forum. 45 posts were made, 19 from the community, and 26 made by the system account.
daospace 1 is a DAO discovery platform that aggregates contributions across different DAOs. We will be providing weekly Automated AI Summaries to help reduce information overload, and so that all members can stay up to date on forum activity within the DAO. Below is a summary of every topic made within the OP Governance Forum from last week.
Feel free to leave us feedback in the comments below. You can get in touch with the daospace team on X (Twitter) 1 , or reach out to the founders directly on X as well: Jaris James & Sixty 1
DeVouch (Decentralized Vouching with Attestations) - Mission Grant - Project Updates 2
Created: 2024 - 05 - 06
Author: @mitch
Summary
DeVouch is introducing a solution to the challenge of identifying trustworthy projects in the ecosystem by leveraging attestations. The platform will aggregate projects from various funding platforms into a filterable list where users can endorse projects or flag them as suspicious. Attestations come from specific groups like Optimism Badgeholders or Gitcoin Passport Scores, helping users make informed decisions about project integrity. The project is in the design and coding phase, aiming to provide easy-to-use APIs for integration into analytics tools and grant platforms. The initiative also plans to develop a user-friendly front-end interface and aims to streamline external API endpoints and standard schemas for broader ecosystem adoption.
Code of Conduct Council - Retrospective Season 5 1
Created: 2024 - 05 - 06
Author: CoCCouncil
Summary
The Season 5 Retrospective discussed by the collective focused on achieving milestones set in the Budget Proposal and Charter at the start of the season. The team made progress in managing conflicts, reducing governance overhead, and enhancing community engagement. They provided impactful support and communication, managed conflicts effectively, and worked towards decentralization of governance. Suggestions included incentivizing closer community involvement, simplifying internal procedures, adjusting the charter to handle various behavioral issues, and expanding innovative roles for the next season. The team recommended parallelization of Alternative Dispute Resolution processes and continuing their operations with a focus on improving conflict management within the Optimism ecosystem.
Where it’s better to sell/buy $OP
Created: 2024 - 05 - 06
Author: @Ethplorer.eth
Summary
The discussion focused on whether it matters where to buy or sell $OP for better rates, assuming that everyone follows the same strategy. People considered factors such as liquidity, Optimism blockchain activity, visibility, and popularization of $OP. The options presented included buying and selling on the Optimism blockchain, buying on Optimism and selling outside on another exchange, buying outside and selling on Optimism, buying and selling outside, or the idea that it doesn’t matter. Participants were asked to vote on their preferred option.
[Discussion] On-chain Builders Delivering Metrics Data
Created: 2024 - 05 - 07
Author: @pfedprog
Summary
Retro Funding 4 is launching to reward on-chain builders who have deployed contracts to the Superchain and contributed to the success of Optimism. The program aims to expand the network’s impact by rewarding those who have increased blockspace demand and brought value to the Collective. Eligible builders need to meet certain criteria and submit their applications before June 6 th, 2024 . Difficulty lies in accurately presenting results within specified metrics, but tools like EVM Smart Contract Explorer are being used to assist in quickly obtaining smart contract data. Feedback from the community is sought on how to verify eligibility for builders and what additional impactful metrics beyond the requested ones could be considered. The use of APIs like Blockscout is mentioned to access blockchain data.
What is the exact amount of Badgeholders in the Citizen House? 1
Created: 2024 - 05 - 08
Author: @ 0 xR
Summary
The user is seeking help to locate information about the number of citizens in the Citizen House but has been unable to find it in places like Agora, Dune, and Curia. They are asking the optimistic community for assistance.
Cycle 22 Final Grants roundup
Created: 2024 - 05 - 08
Author: Gonna.eth
Summary
In Season 5 , the Grants Program faced significant challenges and underwent a stress test, particularly with the Mission Requests Program. Despite the hurdles, the Grants Council demonstrated adaptability and resilience, reviewing a remarkable surge in applications with efficiency. Season 5 saw a 73 . 2 % growth in applications compared to the previous season, receiving a total of 530 Mission Request applications. The Council adapted well to changes, including handling a transition in the Builders Subcommittee. Subcommittees refined Rubrics tailored to each intent, with 8 Rubrics applied to 27 Mission Requests. The review process for Season 5 has concluded, and a detailed list of 74 Finalists for Cycle 22 has been provided. The Finalists represent grants totaling approximately 4 . 56 M OP, with the total recommended grants for Season 5 amounting to around 7 . 12 M OP. There was a proposal to change the use of unused rewards, and the Council expects a surplus of 1 . 87 M OP to be returned to the Gov Fund. The Council aims to make Optimism the top destination for builders and hopes their efforts will contribute to the community’s goals. Finalists have been asked to stay tuned for further instructions regarding KYC details.
Stay optimistic!
Season 6 : Grants Council Operating Budget
Created: 2024 - 05 - 08
Author: system
Summary
In Season 6 , the Grants Council, a persistent council within the Collective, will need to propose an operating budget and charter for the season. Prospective leads can submit budget proposals by May 22 nd, with the highest-voted proposal being approved. The council will be responsible for proposing Mission Requests under Intent # 3 and processing violations of grant policies. The council will need to be held accountable to governance mechanisms. Governance will measure the council’s impact through various KPIs related to builder experience and grant performance. Delegates will vote on the approved budget and elect the leadership roles within the council.
Retro Funding 4 : Deliberative process on the definition of profit
Created: 2024 - 05 - 08
Author: system
Summary
In Optimism’s Retroactive Public Goods Funding (Retro Funding), a shift towards a collective definition of profit is being introduced in Retro Funding 4 . This move aims to streamline the calculation process and enhance predictability for contributors. Instead of individual assessments, a collective definition of profit will be determined through a deliberative process and subsequently ratified by the Citizens’ House. This definition will be applied universally to all projects, simplifying the voting process and reducing voting complexity for badgeholders. The aim is to foster a more productive and sustainable ecosystem by rewarding positive impact on the collective. Through a deliberative process set up for Retro Funding 4 , a randomly sampled subset of 50 citizens will deliberate on the definition of profit, guided by facilitated sessions and balanced information. The outcomes of this deliberation will influence the Retro Funding rewards allocated to projects, creating a more streamlined and predictable process for contributors.
Foundation S 6 AMA / Token House Call will be [Tuesday, May 14 th @ 11 : 00 PT / 14 : 00 ET / 18 : 00 GMT / 19 : 00 CET]
Created: 2024 - 05 - 08
Author: @Michael
Summary
The Token House Community Call is scheduled for next Tuesday and will feature a Season 6 AMA with @ lavande and the Foundation, as well as a surprise talk from @ ben-chain. The call will be held on Google Meet, and new delegates interested in Optimism Governance can DM Michael for introductions. The event promises to be an informative and engaging session.
Developer Advisory Board - Retrospective Season 5
Created: 2024 - 05 - 08
Author: @zachobront
Summary
The Budget Proposal and Charter set specific milestones and KPIs for the season, including assessing and approving Delegate Mission Requests, aiding the Grants Council, and advising on technical milestones. Progress has been made on all these goals, with some completed and others expanded in scope.
The Developer Advisory Board’s outputs effectively supported the intended purpose by providing guidance on Delegate Mission Requests and applications, influencing final decisions positively.
Proposed changes to Internal Operating Procedures (IOPs) include integrating DAB feedback earlier in the process and implementing more efficient feedback assignment methods.
No suggested adjustments to the Charter were made, as it was deemed appropriate. Potential expansion into other areas for technical insight was welcomed.
The team’s mandate was considered appropriate, with a suggestion to possibly expand into other areas of the Optimism ecosystem to provide even more value in the future.
About the Feedback category
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: maxwell
Summary
This category is designed for users to provide feedback on various topics and ask questions in order to receive constructive criticism or opinions from others. Whether it’s feedback on a project, a product, a service, or any other area that requires input, users can seek advice and suggestions from the community here. The goal is to help individuals improve and make informed decisions based on the feedback they receive.
About the Elected Representatives category 1
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: maxwell
Summary
The discussion focuses on representing structures within the Optimism Collective that include boards, commissions, and councils made up of elected representatives. These bodies form part of the organizational framework of the collective.
Season 6 : Developer Advisory Board Renewal
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
Delegates are being asked to vote on approving a Developer Advisory Board (DAB) Operating Budget for Season 6 . The proposed budget with the highest proportion of “Yes” votes will be approved, effectively electing the Lead who authored the budget. If approved, other DAB members will be elected, ensuring at least one representative of OP Labs or other Core Devs is on the Board. The DAB will play a key role in technical decision-making within the Collective, reviewing protocol upgrades, advising the Grants Council on technical grants and milestones, and more. Delegates have until May 22 nd to submit proposal drafts for the DAB Operating Budget. Performance metrics are suggested for measuring the DAB’s impact, and rewards are subject to a KYC process. Delegates will vote on the DAB Operating Budget in the upcoming Special Voting Cycle # 23 a.
Season 6 : Code of Conduct Council Renewal 1
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
In Season 6 , the discussion revolves around renewing the Code of Conduct Council (CoCC) within the Collective. The Council was initially created in Season 5 to experiment with decentralized enforcement of the Code of Conduct. Over time, the scope of the CoCC has been adjusted, with a current proposal limiting its responsibilities to enforcing the Rules of Engagement across all Optimism-hosted platforms. Delegates have the opportunity to vote on approving a Code of Conduct Council Operating Budget, which will also elect a Lead to oversee the Council. If the budget is not approved, the supportNERDs will continue to enforce the Rules of Engagement. Proposals for the Council Operating Budget are due by a specific deadline, and key metrics for assessing the Council’s impact are provided. Delegates play a crucial role in deciding the future of the Code of Conduct Council through their voting decisions.
Season 6 : Code of Conduct Rescoping # 2
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
A detailed overview of the evolution of the Code of Conduct (CoC) within the Token House and Citizens’ House is outlined. Various iterations and experiments with governance enforcement mechanisms, such as the creation of a Council, have been discussed. The focus has been on reducing governance overhead while ensuring accountability. The updates include shifting grant-related violations enforcement to the Grants Council, promoting self-dealing policies via incentive design and free market delegation, and establishing various voting and metric-based controls. The discussion also addresses the continued enforcement of Rules of Engagement and the potential role of a Code of Conduct Council for future enforcement. The decentralization of accountability through mediation, delegation, grants oversight, expectation setting, and voting design is emphasized. The changes are slated for Season 6 and flexible for reassessment based on feedback and outcomes. Appreciation is extended to the Code of Conduct Council for their contributions towards innovative solutions.
Season 5 : Missions v 2 Retrospective
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
The discussion provides a retrospective on Season 5 : Mission Requests, focusing on feedback from various stakeholders to inform the redesign of Mission Requests for v 2 . 5 . The retrospective delves into key areas such as drafting, sponsoring, approving, voting, applying to, and selecting Mission Applications. Changes to streamline the process, improve clarity, and reduce downtime have been made based on Season 5 experiences. Mission Requests now involve fewer delegates drafting them, sponsorship by eligible delegates, and the elimination of the delegate approval process for Season 6 . The voting process has been refined to address under-allocations and improve delegate experience. Application cycles have been adjusted to provide grants more frequently, addressing past issues of application processing delays. The retrospective highlights achievements, challenges, and areas for improvement, with Season 5 feedback and insights shaping the design of Missions v 2 . 5 .
Proposing a New Metric: Pairwise Community Signaling in Retro Funding 4
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: @Zeptimus
Summary
Pairwise is introducing a new version focused on making signaling RetroPGF accessible to the Optimism Community. The open-source voting dapp streamlines community signaling by allowing users to choose between two options and aggregates their choices into quantifiable results. The intention is to amplify community voices, increase project discovery, and network effects. Pairwise aims to engage token holders, delegates, RetroPGF recipients, and badgeholders in community signaling. The platform offers a user-friendly experience, minimizes the cost and cognitive burden of voting, and converts subjective inputs into measurable outputs.
To encourage engagement, the new version includes features like mobile optimization, voter feedback, Tinder-style filtering, sound effects, and pseudonymous account abstraction. Instead of allocating tokens, users will rank projects to streamline the voting process. Challenges to overcome include tight timelines and engagement levels, with a marketing campaign planned to maximize participation. Four metrics are proposed for different stakeholder groups, and voting power distribution details are provided.
The Pairwise ranking will aggregate input from Badgeholders, Recipients, Delegates, and Holders, with engagement requirements for each group to qualify as a metric for voting. The app’s timing will align with the project’s finalization, and reward distribution is structured to promote stakeholder engagement. An anti-gaming strategy will ensure the integrity of the voting process, and transparency will be maintained throughout the reward calculation and distribution steps. The community is encouraged to share feedback to shape this experiment collectively, with a prototype set to launch internally on May 15 .
Season 6 : Intents Ratification
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
The discussion revolved around the upcoming Season 6 of the Optimism Collective, where significant changes are being made to the setting of Intents and budgets. The Foundation will now propose all Intents, aiming for data-driven decisions, with the Token House ratifying them. Season 6 focuses on decentralization progress, expanding the Superchain with new chains, and growing application developers on the Superchain. Each Intent has specific targets, metrics, and areas of support, with different funding sources allocated for their realization. The roles of the Foundation, core development teams, and various funds like Retro Funding and Gov Fund were discussed in detail to support these Intents effectively.
Season 5 : Retro Governance Participation Rewards
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
In Season 5 , there was a focus on strategic work through Missions v 2 and decentralization efforts like the establishment of the Security Council and Anticapture Commission. A Developer Advisory Board and Code of Conduct Council were also experimented with. The Citizens’ House rewarded participants with OP for their contributions, leading towards social and technological decentralization. Retroactive rewards were given to governance participants meeting specific criteria such as voting participation, involvement in the Anticapture Commission, sponsoring approved Mission Requests, and contributing to reports. All rewards are subject to a KYC process and allocated from the Ecosystem Fund. The highest impact contributions aligned with Collective Intents were rewarded following the Collective Rewards Framework.
Season 6 : Missions v 2 . 5 1
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
Huge appreciation is extended to several individuals for reviewing and providing feedback on scope changes for the Feedback Commission. Season 6 ’s Mission process remains consistent with some adjustments to streamline the process for delegates and grant applicants based on feedback. The changes include allowing the Feedback Commission, Grants Council, and Growth Team to propose Mission Requests, reducing the involvement of Top 100 delegates in drafting requests, and enabling sponsorship of Mission Requests by any member of the Feedback Commission or Grants Council. The final approval of Mission Requests will still be decided by the Token House, and improvements will be made to the grant application process based on feedback from Season 5 . These modifications aim to enhance the experience for builders, optimize timelines, and align grant calendars with governance schedules. The adjustments are influenced by insights gathered from various stakeholders and will be treated as an ongoing experiment, with room for further refinements based on feedback collected during the process.
Season 6 : Suggested Mission Requests
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
The discussion revolves around the proposed Mission Requests for Season 6 , primarily focused on governance, decentralization, and developer growth within the Optimism ecosystem. The suggested Mission Requests aim to align efforts with specific goals and metrics, with a focus on critical DAO infrastructure, research on governance parameters, driving delegation, and engaging developers across different sectors like DeFi, stablecoins, gaming, AI/ML applications, and more. The allocation of budgets, success metrics, and specific guidelines for OP Chains to run their grants programs under Intent 3 B are also detailed. Collaboration between various bodies within the ecosystem is emphasized to ensure coherence and effectiveness in achieving the outlined objectives.
Anticapture Commission - Retrospective Season 5 1
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: @ACC
Summary
The discussion covers various aspects of the Anticapture Commission’s performance during Season 5 . Progress towards set goals like increasing votable supply and defining standards for top delegates was analyzed, noting successes and areas for improvement. Impact assessment reveals the team’s support of their defined Intent, with a focus on decentralization and transparency. Suggestions included adjustments to Internal Operating Procedures like voting windows, notification definitions, and call length. Proposed Charter adjustments involved clarifying member responsibilities and simplifying mid-season membership recalculations. Recommendations for next season involved enhancing collaboration with OP chains and adapting efforts as needed, emphasizing the Commission’s growing relevance. Gratitude was expressed to all involved parties for their contributions and support throughout the season.
Audit Requests S 5 final roundup 1
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: Gonna.eth
Summary
The discussion highlighted the accomplishments of @jackanorak during Season 5 and recommended him for the retroPGF program due to his significant contributions. The second batch of projects selected for RFG- 3 , focusing on Smart Contract Auditing Services, were announced after a thorough evaluation. The discussion also covered the approval of new Audit Providers for the audit program in Season 5 and shared key learnings for improving the process, including the need for a subcommittee, revising the rubric, establishing a public platform for projects, holding weekly office hours, and reforming the audits form. Overall, the audit election process was deemed successful, with emphasis placed on evaluating the effectiveness of the program through milestones and metrics for future growth and security within the ecosystem.
Optimism Fractal Season 3
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: @Rosmari
Summary
Join the Optimism Fractal Season 3 ’s inaugural event featuring a Respect Game followed by a planning session introducing a proposal for a social coordination game named Cagendas. This game allows participants to vote on discussion topics for the weekly sessions held in the new Optimism Town Hall. The proposal suggests transitioning from the existing Planning Sessions to these Town Hall events without extending the total event time. Check out the details in the introductory post, Snapshot proposal, and join the Zoom room for the event to show your support!
About the Collective Strategy category
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: maxwell
Summary
This discussion pertains to collective strategy and coordination regarding intentions and roadmaps. Participants are likely sharing ideas, plans, and approaches to align efforts and achieve common goals.
Delegate Resignation Process
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: maxwell
Summary
Delegates are key players in the Collective’s operations and are encouraged to experiment and iterate continuously. For those needing to resign temporarily, a specific process is outlined to minimize disruption. Delegates are advised to communicate their resignation period, reasons, and potential future involvement within the Collective. Large delegates are urged to guide their delegators in reallocating their tokens while they’re away. The use of advanced delegation is proposed for short-term absences, with broader implementation subject to contract modifications. Long-term resignation plans should be shared across platforms and with key members for awareness. Elected or appointed positions require a replacement to be appointed and communicated in advance. More details on the resignation process for Citizens will be shared prior to Season 6 .
Season 6 : Collective Reward Framework
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
The discussion highlighted the Collective Rewards Framework for Season 6 , designed to provide a consistent approach to rewarding contributions within the community. The framework aims to transition the decision-making process to the community, introducing guidelines for setting rewards, evolving with the introduction of a Budget Board in Season 7 . It stresses the importance of utilizing Retroactive Public Goods Funding for most governance operations in the long term. Impact Ratings are introduced as a guide for determining rewards based on the contributions’ impact. Various contribution types are outlined, each with specific reward structures. The emphasis is on output and impact over input, reflecting the community’s adaptive approach and commitment to governance token integrity. Elected representatives, contributors, governance participants, and service providers are all addressed in the framework, aiming to provide clarity and consistency in reward allocation.
Season 6 : Guide to Season 6
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
Members of the Feedback Commission provided input and feedback on Season 6 drafts, starting on June 27 th through December 11 th. Grant applications for Season 6 open every 3 weeks from July 18 th. The Season will focus on optimizing programs introduced in Season 5 and shifting governance control to the community. Intents, Collective Rewards Framework, Developer Advisory Board, Anticapture Commission, Code of Conduct, and other key aspects will see changes and refinements. The Season will also emphasize transparency and community feedback in decision-making processes, including the continuous transition of governance power to the community. The Season 6 Reflection Period Guide details the necessary activities. Additionally, changes will include transitions like introducing Blockspace Charters, the Security Council Election, and updates to Trust Tiers and the govNERDs program. Various amendments and renewals will shape the governance landscape for Season 6 .
The post provides a detailed summary of the last week's activities within the Optimism Collective, including information on different projects, councils, forums, retro funding, grants, code of conduct, developer advisory board, feedback, and key discussions and proposals for Season 6 initiatives. The initiatives aim to promote community involvement, streamline governance processes, reward contributions, and enhance the ecosystem within the DAO through various councils and advisory boards.
Season 6 : Mission Application Guide
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
In Season 6…
Season 6 : Mission Application Guide
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
In Season 6 , teams can apply for Mission grants to execute specific initiatives outlined in Mission Requests by the Token House or Foundation. The Grants Council selects teams to fulfill these Requests. Each team must have a point of contact, and Trust Tiers determine the funding amount a team can request. Retro Funding may be available if a Mission grant generates additional impact. There are clear guidelines for applying for both Foundation and Token House Mission grants, which involve meeting deadlines, following templates, and providing progress updates. Grants are subject to policies and require KYC with the Foundation. Applicants are encouraged to understand the grant process and not assume additional Retro Funding. Applications for Season 6 Mission grants open on July 18 th, with deadlines provided on the public governance calendar.
Season 6 Elections: Grants Council
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
The Season 6 Election for the Grants Council involves the election of Reviewers by the Token House through a Special Voting Cycle. Those interested in nominating themselves need to follow a specific template and submit their information by a set deadline. The Foundation will organize a town hall before the elections. There are strategic considerations for the expertise needed in Reviewers, such as knowledge of DeFi and Gaming. Approval voting will determine the elected Reviewers, allowing delegates to vote for multiple nominees. The voting mechanism may adjust based on the Council’s structure and number of candidates. Self-nominated candidates must commit to dedicating approximately 20 hours per week to reviewing grant applications and Council operations.
Season 6 Nominations: Grants Council 1
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
Members are invited to submit their self-nominations for the Season 6 Grants Council, following the outlined template and process. All nominations must be posted on the dedicated thread by 19 : 00 GMT on Wednesday, June 5 th.
Season 6 Nominations: Developer Advisory Board
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
Individuals are invited to nominate themselves for the Season 6 Developer Advisory Board by posting their nominations in a designated thread using a specific template by 19 : 00 GMT on June 5 th.
Season 6 Nominations: Code of Conduct Council
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
Users are asked to post self-nominations for the Season 6 Code of Conduct Council on a specified thread by 19 : 00 GMT on a certain date, following a provided template and process. This is for individuals looking to participate in the council and uphold the community’s code of conduct.
Season 6 Elections: Developer Advisory Board 1
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
The discussion revolves around the Season 6 Elections for the Developer Advisory Board within the Token House. The elections are happening during a Special Voting Cycle # 23 b from June 13 th to June 19 th at 19 : 00 GMT. The board members will be elected, except for at least one representative from OP Labs or other Core Devs, who will be appointed by the Foundation to maintain coherence with roadmaps. Self-nominations for board membership need to be submitted by June 5 th. The potential criteria for board members include expertise in the Optimism and/or Ethereum ecosystem, understanding of protocol upgrades, coding skills, time dedication, and experiences in security, auditing, grant evaluations, and technical representation across various layers of the stack.
For delegates, there will be a review through approval voting in Special Voting Cycle # 23 b. Delegates can vote for as many nominees as they choose, including themselves, but should also cast votes for other elected positions. The final election process may vary based on the Council’s structure and the number of candidates.
Season 6 Elections: Code of Conduct Council
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
Season 6 of the Optimism ecosystem features the elections for the Code of Conduct Council, with members being elected by the Token House in a special voting cycle. Nominees must fill out a template by a specified date and have completed conflict resolution training by the start of the season. Representatives are restricted to one elected position per season, with no term limits currently in place.
For delegates, Code of Conduct Council members will be elected through approval voting in the special voting cycle. Delegates can vote for multiple nominees with equal voting power, with those receiving the highest percentage of approval votes being elected to the Council. The process allows delegates to vote for themselves as long as they also cast votes for the remaining open positions. The voting mechanism may be adjusted based on the Council structure and number of candidates.
About the Governance Design category
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: maxwell
Summary
This discussion focuses on the Collective’s metagovernance strategy. It includes initiatives like the Path to Metagov and the Collective Feedback Commission, as well as programs such as the Chain Delegation Program. Metagovernance centers around designing how the Collective governs its governance system.
Season 6 : Mission Request Voting Guide
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
In Season 6 of the mission requests, delegates will vote on approving specific initiatives aligned with the Collective’s Intents. Missions are tightly scoped initiatives that can be completed within 12 months. Each mission proposal must receive a minimum number of “yes” votes equal to 51 % of the 30 % quorum to be approved. Delegates will rank mission requests based on the number of “yes” votes they receive, and the top-ranked requests within the approved budget will be accepted in rank order until the intent budget is fully allocated. Delegates can cast votes based on their full voting power, and should prioritize missions that they believe deserve to move forward. Voting on mission requests will take place in Voting Cycle # 24 , with the Grants Council evaluating and approving grants for the selected initiatives. It’s important that mission requests describe start-to-finish initiatives, not ongoing services, and should not rely on Foundation action or propose metagovernance changes.
Season 6 : Mission Request Creation Guide
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
The document outlines the guidelines for creating and submitting Mission Requests for Season 6 to achieve the Collective’s Intents. Missions are specific initiatives aligned with the Intents. Only Feedback Commission and Grants Council members can create Mission Requests. Requests should be tightly scoped, completed within 12 months, and not rely on ongoing services. Requests are aligned with specific Intents, must outline deliverables, impact measures, and be approved by Token House. Requests for Mission grants must be submitted by July 10 th, with drafts encouraged for feedback. The process aims to prioritize work and incentivize execution within the DAO community.
Season 6 : Anticapture Commission Amendment
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
The discussion focuses on amendments to the Anticapture Commission Charter for Season 6 of the governance structure. The Commission aims to prevent one stakeholder or group from capturing the Token House, serving tokenholders. Proposed changes include refining membership criteria, voting requirements, and responsibilities. The Commission will alert the Citizens’ House of power imbalances, vote on proposals subject to veto, advocate for decentralization, and ensure transparency in governance. The amendments seek to streamline processes, enhance participation, and clarify expectations for members. The proposals will undergo a voting process in Special Voting Cycle # 23 a to determine their implementation.
Season 6 : Chain Delegation Program Amendment
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
A special thanks was extended to those who provided feedback on the amendments related to the Chain Delegation Program for Season 6 . The program was not utilized in Season 5 but is expected to be important moving forward. The amendment outlines criteria for OP Chains to be eligible for delegation, with different levels of delegation based on performance metrics. The program size is set at 20 M to support the initial OP Chains. Delegations will be reassessed per season, with caps in place based on votable supply. OP Chains need to meet specific expectations to participate, with a focus on governance engagement. The proposed amendments will be put to a vote, ensuring the program continues through Season 6 .
Grant Council - Retrospective Season 5
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: Gonna.eth
Summary
The Season 5 Grants Council retrospective team has reviewed and achieved several benchmark milestones and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). They successfully reviewed over 95 % of mission requests, maintained a finalist rate below 30 %, and processed over 300 proposals. The team also received positive NPS scores and established a Milestone Hub for project tracking. The impact assessment highlighted the team’s dedication and resilience despite challenges. Adjustments to internal operating procedures and proposed changes to the charter were suggested to enhance efficiency and fairness in the review process. Recommendations for the next season include refining processes, enhancing transparency, and reviewing budget allotments mid-season for Token House voting. The Grants Council aims to improve operations while upholding transparency, efficiency, and accountability within the Optimism Collective.
The new forum Layout
Created: 2024 - 05 - 11
Author: @yummybillasd
Summary
The discussion focused on praising the user-friendly, structured, and organized nature of the conversation or platform being utilized. The user expressed gratitude for the efficiency and ease of navigating the discussion.
Season 6 : Chain Delegation Program Amended
Created: 2024 - 05 - 12
Author: system
Summary
In Season 6 , an amended version of the Chain Delegation Program was introduced, which is set to be the authoritative version if approved. The program focuses on onboarding approximately 15 OP Chains to participate actively in Optimism’s governance. The criteria for OP Chain qualification includes being in the Superchain Registry, contributing revenue back to the Collective, generating over 1 ETH/month in sequencer revenue, and reaching 1 M in transaction volume for two consecutive months. Standard Blockspace operating chains are eligible for additional delegation. OP Chains must adhere to voting participation rates, set delegate statements, and have a point of contact for delegation. Delegations will be capped at 9 % of the votable supply, and any violations of the Optimist Expectations will result in removal from the Chain Delegation Program.
Season 6 : Anticapture Commission Amended
Created: 2024 - 05 - 12
Author: system
Summary
Season 6 brings an amended version of the Anticapture Commission Charter introduced in Season 5 , aiming to prevent the capture of Token House by any single stakeholder or group. The Commission’s goals include providing alerts on stakeholder power imbalances, voting on proposals subject to Citizens’ House veto, and advocating for decentralization and transparency. The Commission is comprised of high impact delegates based on certain criteria and members are expected to fulfill responsibilities like voting on ACC votes, attending meetings, and contributing to reports. The Commission Lead plays a crucial role in organizing meetings, coordinating votes, and authoring reports for the Citizens’ House.
Season 6 : Reflection Period Guide 1
Created: 2024 - 05 - 12
Author: system
Summary
For Season 6 , there is a structured timeline for various activities related to governance and decision-making within the community. It starts with a reflection period for all voters to read and review retrospectives from the previous season. Different topics are covered for education, including the Collective Reward Framework and details about Missions and Superchain Governance in Season 6 .
There’s a deadline for those interested in running for a leadership role to post proposals and seek approvals from top 100 delegates. Proposals cover areas such as operating budgets, protocol upgrades, and council renewals. Delegates have a specific period to approve proposals before they move to the voting phase in the Token House.
After the Token House votes on various proposals, there’s a Citizens House Veto Period and then nominations open for running as a representative. Candidate assessments and reading follow, leading up to the Special Voting Cycle where Token House votes and Citizens House ratifies decisions.
The timeline extends to include voting cycles and elections for representative structures like the Grants Council, Developer Advisory Board, and Code of Conduct Council. Each phase has specific actions and deadlines, leading to the start of Season 6 on June 27 th. The season includes voting cycles, grant applications, and follows a public governance calendar for continued participation and decision-making.
gm Optimism Collective :red_circle: :sparkles:
Last week was super active on forum. 45 posts were…
gm Optimism Collective :red_circle: :sparkles:
Last week was super active on forum. 45 posts were made, 19 from the community, and 26 made by the system account.
daospace is a DAO discovery platform that aggregates contributions across different DAOs. We will be providing weekly Automated AI Summaries to help reduce information overload, and so that all members can stay up to date on forum activity within the DAO. Below is a summary of every topic made within the OP Governance Forum from last week.
Feel free to leave us feedback in the comments below. You can get in touch with the daospace team on X (Twitter) , or reach out to the founders directly on X as well: Jaris James & Sixty
DeVouch (Decentralized Vouching with Attestations) - Mission Grant - Project Updates
Created: 2024 - 05 - 06
Author: @mitch
Summary
DeVouch is introducing a solution to the challenge of identifying trustworthy projects in the ecosystem by leveraging attestations. The platform will aggregate projects from various funding platforms into a filterable list where users can endorse projects or flag them as suspicious. Attestations come from specific groups like Optimism Badgeholders or Gitcoin Passport Scores, helping users make informed decisions about project integrity. The project is in the design and coding phase, aiming to provide easy-to-use APIs for integration into analytics tools and grant platforms. The initiative also plans to develop a user-friendly front-end interface and aims to streamline external API endpoints and standard schemas for broader ecosystem adoption.
Code of Conduct Council - Retrospective Season 5
Created: 2024 - 05 - 06
Author: CoCCouncil
Summary
The Season 5 Retrospective discussed by the collective focused on achieving milestones set in the Budget Proposal and Charter at the start of the season. The team made progress in managing conflicts, reducing governance overhead, and enhancing community engagement. They provided impactful support and communication, managed conflicts effectively, and worked towards decentralization of governance. Suggestions included incentivizing closer community involvement, simplifying internal procedures, adjusting the charter to handle various behavioral issues, and expanding innovative roles for the next season. The team recommended parallelization of Alternative Dispute Resolution processes and continuing their operations with a focus on improving conflict management within the Optimism ecosystem.
Where it’s better to sell/buy $OP
Created: 2024 - 05 - 06
Author: @Ethplorer.eth
Summary
The discussion focused on whether it matters where to buy or sell $OP for better rates, assuming that everyone follows the same strategy. People considered factors such as liquidity, Optimism blockchain activity, visibility, and popularization of $OP. The options presented included buying and selling on the Optimism blockchain, buying on Optimism and selling outside on another exchange, buying outside and selling on Optimism, buying and selling outside, or the idea that it doesn’t matter. Participants were asked to vote on their preferred option.
[Discussion] On-chain Builders Delivering Metrics Data
Created: 2024 - 05 - 07
Author: @pfedprog
Summary
Retro Funding 4 is launching to reward on-chain builders who have deployed contracts to the Superchain and contributed to the success of Optimism. The program aims to expand the network’s impact by rewarding those who have increased blockspace demand and brought value to the Collective. Eligible builders need to meet certain criteria and submit their applications before June 6 th, 2024 . Difficulty lies in accurately presenting results within specified metrics, but tools like EVM Smart Contract Explorer are being used to assist in quickly obtaining smart contract data. Feedback from the community is sought on how to verify eligibility for builders and what additional impactful metrics beyond the requested ones could be considered. The use of APIs like Blockscout is mentioned to access blockchain data.
What is the exact amount of Badgeholders in the Citizen House?
Created: 2024 - 05 - 08
Author: @ 0 xR
Summary
The user is seeking help to locate information about the number of citizens in the Citizen House but has been unable to find it in places like Agora, Dune, and Curia. They are asking the optimistic community for assistance.
Cycle 22 Final Grants roundup
Created: 2024 - 05 - 08
Author: Gonna.eth
Summary
In Season 5 , the Grants Program faced significant challenges and underwent a stress test, particularly with the Mission Requests Program. Despite the hurdles, the Grants Council demonstrated adaptability and resilience, reviewing a remarkable surge in applications with efficiency. Season 5 saw a 73 . 2 % growth in applications compared to the previous season, receiving a total of 530 Mission Request applications. The Council adapted well to changes, including handling a transition in the Builders Subcommittee. Subcommittees refined Rubrics tailored to each intent, with 8 Rubrics applied to 27 Mission Requests. The review process for Season 5 has concluded, and a detailed list of 74 Finalists for Cycle 22 has been provided. The Finalists represent grants totaling approximately 4 . 56 M OP, with the total recommended grants for Season 5 amounting to around 7 . 12 M OP. There was a proposal to change the use of unused rewards, and the Council expects a surplus of 1 . 87 M OP to be returned to the Gov Fund. The Council aims to make Optimism the top destination for builders and hopes their efforts will contribute to the community’s goals. Finalists have been asked to stay tuned for further instructions regarding KYC details.
Stay optimistic!
Season 6 : Grants Council Operating Budget
Created: 2024 - 05 - 08
Author: system
Summary
In Season 6 , the Grants Council, a persistent council within the Collective, will need to propose an operating budget and charter for the season. Prospective leads can submit budget proposals by May 22 nd, with the highest-voted proposal being approved. The council will be responsible for proposing Mission Requests under Intent # 3 and processing violations of grant policies. The council will need to be held accountable to governance mechanisms. Governance will measure the council’s impact through various KPIs related to builder experience and grant performance. Delegates will vote on the approved budget and elect the leadership roles within the council.
Retro Funding 4 : Deliberative process on the definition of profit
Created: 2024 - 05 - 08
Author: system
Summary
In Optimism’s Retroactive Public Goods Funding (Retro Funding), a shift towards a collective definition of profit is being introduced in Retro Funding 4 . This move aims to streamline the calculation process and enhance predictability for contributors. Instead of individual assessments, a collective definition of profit will be determined through a deliberative process and subsequently ratified by the Citizens’ House. This definition will be applied universally to all projects, simplifying the voting process and reducing voting complexity for badgeholders. The aim is to foster a more productive and sustainable ecosystem by rewarding positive impact on the collective. Through a deliberative process set up for Retro Funding 4 , a randomly sampled subset of 50 citizens will deliberate on the definition of profit, guided by facilitated sessions and balanced information. The outcomes of this deliberation will influence the Retro Funding rewards allocated to projects, creating a more streamlined and predictable process for contributors.
Foundation S 6 AMA / Token House Call will be [Tuesday, May 14 th @ 11 : 00 PT / 14 : 00 ET / 18 : 00 GMT / 19 : 00 CET]
Created: 2024 - 05 - 08
Author: @Michael
Summary
The Token House Community Call is scheduled for next Tuesday and will feature a Season 6 AMA with @ lavande and the Foundation, as well as a surprise talk from @ ben-chain. The call will be held on Google Meet, and new delegates interested in Optimism Governance can DM Michael for introductions. The event promises to be an informative and engaging session.
Developer Advisory Board - Retrospective Season 5
Created: 2024 - 05 - 08
Author: @zachobront
Summary
The Budget Proposal and Charter set specific milestones and KPIs for the season, including assessing and approving Delegate Mission Requests, aiding the Grants Council, and advising on technical milestones. Progress has been made on all these goals, with some completed and others expanded in scope.
The Developer Advisory Board’s outputs effectively supported the intended purpose by providing guidance on Delegate Mission Requests and applications, influencing final decisions positively.
Proposed changes to Internal Operating Procedures (IOPs) include integrating DAB feedback earlier in the process and implementing more efficient feedback assignment methods.
No suggested adjustments to the Charter were made, as it was deemed appropriate. Potential expansion into other areas for technical insight was welcomed.
The team’s mandate was considered appropriate, with a suggestion to possibly expand into other areas of the Optimism ecosystem to provide even more value in the future.
About the Feedback category
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: maxwell
Summary
This category is designed for users to provide feedback on various topics and ask questions in order to receive constructive criticism or opinions from others. Whether it’s feedback on a project, a product, a service, or any other area that requires input, users can seek advice and suggestions from the community here. The goal is to help individuals improve and make informed decisions based on the feedback they receive.
About the Elected Representatives category
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: maxwell
Summary
The discussion focuses on representing structures within the Optimism Collective that include boards, commissions, and councils made up of elected representatives. These bodies form part of the organizational framework of the collective.
Season 6 : Developer Advisory Board Renewal
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
Delegates are being asked to vote on approving a Developer Advisory Board (DAB) Operating Budget for Season 6 . The proposed budget with the highest proportion of “Yes” votes will be approved, effectively electing the Lead who authored the budget. If approved, other DAB members will be elected, ensuring at least one representative of OP Labs or other Core Devs is on the Board. The DAB will play a key role in technical decision-making within the Collective, reviewing protocol upgrades, advising the Grants Council on technical grants and milestones, and more. Delegates have until May 22 nd to submit proposal drafts for the DAB Operating Budget. Performance metrics are suggested for measuring the DAB’s impact, and rewards are subject to a KYC process. Delegates will vote on the DAB Operating Budget in the upcoming Special Voting Cycle # 23 a.
Season 6 : Code of Conduct Council Renewal
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
In Season 6 , the discussion revolves around renewing the Code of Conduct Council (CoCC) within the Collective. The Council was initially created in Season 5 to experiment with decentralized enforcement of the Code of Conduct. Over time, the scope of the CoCC has been adjusted, with a current proposal limiting its responsibilities to enforcing the Rules of Engagement across all Optimism-hosted platforms. Delegates have the opportunity to vote on approving a Code of Conduct Council Operating Budget, which will also elect a Lead to oversee the Council. If the budget is not approved, the supportNERDs will continue to enforce the Rules of Engagement. Proposals for the Council Operating Budget are due by a specific deadline, and key metrics for assessing the Council’s impact are provided. Delegates play a crucial role in deciding the future of the Code of Conduct Council through their voting decisions.
Season 6 : Code of Conduct Rescoping # 2
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
A detailed overview of the evolution of the Code of Conduct (CoC) within the Token House and Citizens’ House is outlined. Various iterations and experiments with governance enforcement mechanisms, such as the creation of a Council, have been discussed. The focus has been on reducing governance overhead while ensuring accountability. The updates include shifting grant-related violations enforcement to the Grants Council, promoting self-dealing policies via incentive design and free market delegation, and establishing various voting and metric-based controls. The discussion also addresses the continued enforcement of Rules of Engagement and the potential role of a Code of Conduct Council for future enforcement. The decentralization of accountability through mediation, delegation, grants oversight, expectation setting, and voting design is emphasized. The changes are slated for Season 6 and flexible for reassessment based on feedback and outcomes. Appreciation is extended to the Code of Conduct Council for their contributions towards innovative solutions.
Season 5 : Missions v 2 Retrospective
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
The discussion provides a retrospective on Season 5 : Mission Requests, focusing on feedback from various stakeholders to inform the redesign of Mission Requests for v 2 . 5 . The retrospective delves into key areas such as drafting, sponsoring, approving, voting, applying to, and selecting Mission Applications. Changes to streamline the process, improve clarity, and reduce downtime have been made based on Season 5 experiences. Mission Requests now involve fewer delegates drafting them, sponsorship by eligible delegates, and the elimination of the delegate approval process for Season 6 . The voting process has been refined to address under-allocations and improve delegate experience. Application cycles have been adjusted to provide grants more frequently, addressing past issues of application processing delays. The retrospective highlights achievements, challenges, and areas for improvement, with Season 5 feedback and insights shaping the design of Missions v 2 . 5 .
Proposing a New Metric: Pairwise Community Signaling in Retro Funding 4
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: @Zeptimus
Summary
Pairwise is introducing a new version focused on making signaling RetroPGF accessible to the Optimism Community. The open-source voting dapp streamlines community signaling by allowing users to choose between two options and aggregates their choices into quantifiable results. The intention is to amplify community voices, increase project discovery, and network effects. Pairwise aims to engage token holders, delegates, RetroPGF recipients, and badgeholders in community signaling. The platform offers a user-friendly experience, minimizes the cost and cognitive burden of voting, and converts subjective inputs into measurable outputs.
To encourage engagement, the new version includes features like mobile optimization, voter feedback, Tinder-style filtering, sound effects, and pseudonymous account abstraction. Instead of allocating tokens, users will rank projects to streamline the voting process. Challenges to overcome include tight timelines and engagement levels, with a marketing campaign planned to maximize participation. Four metrics are proposed for different stakeholder groups, and voting power distribution details are provided.
The Pairwise ranking will aggregate input from Badgeholders, Recipients, Delegates, and Holders, with engagement requirements for each group to qualify as a metric for voting. The app’s timing will align with the project’s finalization, and reward distribution is structured to promote stakeholder engagement. An anti-gaming strategy will ensure the integrity of the voting process, and transparency will be maintained throughout the reward calculation and distribution steps. The community is encouraged to share feedback to shape this experiment collectively, with a prototype set to launch internally on May 15 .
Season 6 : Intents Ratification
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
The discussion revolved around the upcoming Season 6 of the Optimism Collective, where significant changes are being made to the setting of Intents and budgets. The Foundation will now propose all Intents, aiming for data-driven decisions, with the Token House ratifying them. Season 6 focuses on decentralization progress, expanding the Superchain with new chains, and growing application developers on the Superchain. Each Intent has specific targets, metrics, and areas of support, with different funding sources allocated for their realization. The roles of the Foundation, core development teams, and various funds like Retro Funding and Gov Fund were discussed in detail to support these Intents effectively.
Season 5 : Retro Governance Participation Rewards
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
In Season 5 , there was a focus on strategic work through Missions v 2 and decentralization efforts like the establishment of the Security Council and Anticapture Commission. A Developer Advisory Board and Code of Conduct Council were also experimented with. The Citizens’ House rewarded participants with OP for their contributions, leading towards social and technological decentralization. Retroactive rewards were given to governance participants meeting specific criteria such as voting participation, involvement in the Anticapture Commission, sponsoring approved Mission Requests, and contributing to reports. All rewards are subject to a KYC process and allocated from the Ecosystem Fund. The highest impact contributions aligned with Collective Intents were rewarded following the Collective Rewards Framework.
Season 6 : Missions v 2 . 5
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
Huge appreciation is extended to several individuals for reviewing and providing feedback on scope changes for the Feedback Commission. Season 6 ’s Mission process remains consistent with some adjustments to streamline the process for delegates and grant applicants based on feedback. The changes include allowing the Feedback Commission, Grants Council, and Growth Team to propose Mission Requests, reducing the involvement of Top 100 delegates in drafting requests, and enabling sponsorship of Mission Requests by any member of the Feedback Commission or Grants Council. The final approval of Mission Requests will still be decided by the Token House, and improvements will be made to the grant application process based on feedback from Season 5 . These modifications aim to enhance the experience for builders, optimize timelines, and align grant calendars with governance schedules. The adjustments are influenced by insights gathered from various stakeholders and will be treated as an ongoing experiment, with room for further refinements based on feedback collected during the process.
Season 6 : Suggested Mission Requests
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: system
Summary
The discussion revolves around the proposed Mission Requests for Season 6 , primarily focused on governance, decentralization, and developer growth within the Optimism ecosystem. The suggested Mission Requests aim to align efforts with specific goals and metrics, with a focus on critical DAO infrastructure, research on governance parameters, driving delegation, and engaging developers across different sectors like DeFi, stablecoins, gaming, AI/ML applications, and more. The allocation of budgets, success metrics, and specific guidelines for OP Chains to run their grants programs under Intent 3 B are also detailed. Collaboration between various bodies within the ecosystem is emphasized to ensure coherence and effectiveness in achieving the outlined objectives.
Anticapture Commission - Retrospective Season 5
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: @ACC
Summary
The discussion covers various aspects of the Anticapture Commission’s performance during Season 5 . Progress towards set goals like increasing votable supply and defining standards for top delegates was analyzed, noting successes and areas for improvement. Impact assessment reveals the team’s support of their defined Intent, with a focus on decentralization and transparency. Suggestions included adjustments to Internal Operating Procedures like voting windows, notification definitions, and call length. Proposed Charter adjustments involved clarifying member responsibilities and simplifying mid-season membership recalculations. Recommendations for next season involved enhancing collaboration with OP chains and adapting efforts as needed, emphasizing the Commission’s growing relevance. Gratitude was expressed to all involved parties for their contributions and support throughout the season.
Audit Requests S 5 final roundup
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: Gonna.eth
Summary
The discussion highlighted the accomplishments of @jackanorak during Season 5 and recommended him for the retroPGF program due to his significant contributions. The second batch of projects selected for RFG- 3 , focusing on Smart Contract Auditing Services, were announced after a thorough evaluation. The discussion also covered the approval of new Audit Providers for the audit program in Season 5 and shared key learnings for improving the process, including the need for a subcommittee, revising the rubric, establishing a public platform for projects, holding weekly office hours, and reforming the audits form. Overall, the audit election process was deemed successful, with emphasis placed on evaluating the effectiveness of the program through milestones and metrics for future growth and security within the ecosystem.
Optimism Fractal Season 3
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: @Rosmari
Summary
Join the Optimism Fractal Season 3 ’s inaugural event featuring a Respect Game followed by a planning session introducing a proposal for a social coordination game named Cagendas. This game allows participants to vote on discussion topics for the weekly sessions held in the new Optimism Town Hall. The proposal suggests transitioning from the existing Planning Sessions to these Town Hall events without extending the total event time. Check out the details in the introductory post, Snapshot proposal, and join the Zoom room for the event to show your support!
About the Collective Strategy category
Created: 2024 - 05 - 09
Author: maxwell
Summary
This discussion pertains to collective strategy and coordination regarding intentions and roadmaps. Participants are likely sharing ideas, plans, and approaches to align efforts and achieve common goals.
Delegate Resignation Process
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: maxwell
Summary
Delegates are key players in the Collective’s operations and are encouraged to experiment and iterate continuously. For those needing to resign temporarily, a specific process is outlined to minimize disruption. Delegates are advised to communicate their resignation period, reasons, and potential future involvement within the Collective. Large delegates are urged to guide their delegators in reallocating their tokens while they’re away. The use of advanced delegation is proposed for short-term absences, with broader implementation subject to contract modifications. Long-term resignation plans should be shared across platforms and with key members for awareness. Elected or appointed positions require a replacement to be appointed and communicated in advance. More details on the resignation process for Citizens will be shared prior to Season 6 .
Season 6 : Collective Reward Framework
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
The discussion highlighted the Collective Rewards Framework for Season 6 , designed to provide a consistent approach to rewarding contributions within the community. The framework aims to transition the decision-making process to the community, introducing guidelines for setting rewards, evolving with the introduction of a Budget Board in Season 7 . It stresses the importance of utilizing Retroactive Public Goods Funding for most governance operations in the long term. Impact Ratings are introduced as a guide for determining rewards based on the contributions’ impact. Various contribution types are outlined, each with specific reward structures. The emphasis is on output and impact over input, reflecting the community’s adaptive approach and commitment to governance token integrity. Elected representatives, contributors, governance participants, and service providers are all addressed in the framework, aiming to provide clarity and consistency in reward allocation.
Season 6 : Guide to Season 6
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
Members of the Feedback Commission provided input and feedback on Season 6 drafts, starting on June 27 th through December 11 th. Grant applications for Season 6 open every 3 weeks from July 18 th. The Season will focus on optimizing programs introduced in Season 5 and shifting governance control to the community. Intents, Collective Rewards Framework, Developer Advisory Board, Anticapture Commission, Code of Conduct, and other key aspects will see changes and refinements. The Season will also emphasize transparency and community feedback in decision-making processes, including the continuous transition of governance power to the community. The Season 6 Reflection Period Guide details the necessary activities. Additionally, changes will include transitions like introducing Blockspace Charters, the Security Council Election, and updates to Trust Tiers and the govNERDs program. Various amendments and renewals will shape the governance landscape for Season 6 .
Season 6 : Mission Application Guide
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
In Season 6…
Season 6 : Mission Application Guide
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
In Season 6 , teams can apply for Mission grants to execute specific initiatives outlined in Mission Requests by the Token House or Foundation. The Grants Council selects teams to fulfill these Requests. Each team must have a point of contact, and Trust Tiers determine the funding amount a team can request. Retro Funding may be available if a Mission grant generates additional impact. There are clear guidelines for applying for both Foundation and Token House Mission grants, which involve meeting deadlines, following templates, and providing progress updates. Grants are subject to policies and require KYC with the Foundation. Applicants are encouraged to understand the grant process and not assume additional Retro Funding. Applications for Season 6 Mission grants open on July 18 th, with deadlines provided on the public governance calendar.
Season 6 Elections: Grants Council
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
The Season 6 Election for the Grants Council involves the election of Reviewers by the Token House through a Special Voting Cycle. Those interested in nominating themselves need to follow a specific template and submit their information by a set deadline. The Foundation will organize a town hall before the elections. There are strategic considerations for the expertise needed in Reviewers, such as knowledge of DeFi and Gaming. Approval voting will determine the elected Reviewers, allowing delegates to vote for multiple nominees. The voting mechanism may adjust based on the Council’s structure and number of candidates. Self-nominated candidates must commit to dedicating approximately 20 hours per week to reviewing grant applications and Council operations.
Season 6 Nominations: Grants Council
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
Members are invited to submit their self-nominations for the Season 6 Grants Council, following the outlined template and process. All nominations must be posted on the dedicated thread by 19 : 00 GMT on Wednesday, June 5 th.
Season 6 Nominations: Developer Advisory Board
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
Individuals are invited to nominate themselves for the Season 6 Developer Advisory Board by posting their nominations in a designated thread using a specific template by 19 : 00 GMT on June 5 th.
Season 6 Nominations: Code of Conduct Council
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
Users are asked to post self-nominations for the Season 6 Code of Conduct Council on a specified thread by 19 : 00 GMT on a certain date, following a provided template and process. This is for individuals looking to participate in the council and uphold the community’s code of conduct.
Season 6 Elections: Developer Advisory Board
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
The discussion revolves around the Season 6 Elections for the Developer Advisory Board within the Token House. The elections are happening during a Special Voting Cycle # 23 b from June 13 th to June 19 th at 19 : 00 GMT. The board members will be elected, except for at least one representative from OP Labs or other Core Devs, who will be appointed by the Foundation to maintain coherence with roadmaps. Self-nominations for board membership need to be submitted by June 5 th. The potential criteria for board members include expertise in the Optimism and/or Ethereum ecosystem, understanding of protocol upgrades, coding skills, time dedication, and experiences in security, auditing, grant evaluations, and technical representation across various layers of the stack.
For delegates, there will be a review through approval voting in Special Voting Cycle # 23 b. Delegates can vote for as many nominees as they choose, including themselves, but should also cast votes for other elected positions. The final election process may vary based on the Council’s structure and the number of candidates.
Season 6 Elections: Code of Conduct Council
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
Season 6 of the Optimism ecosystem features the elections for the Code of Conduct Council, with members being elected by the Token House in a special voting cycle. Nominees must fill out a template by a specified date and have completed conflict resolution training by the start of the season. Representatives are restricted to one elected position per season, with no term limits currently in place.
For delegates, Code of Conduct Council members will be elected through approval voting in the special voting cycle. Delegates can vote for multiple nominees with equal voting power, with those receiving the highest percentage of approval votes being elected to the Council. The process allows delegates to vote for themselves as long as they also cast votes for the remaining open positions. The voting mechanism may be adjusted based on the Council structure and number of candidates.
About the Governance Design category
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: maxwell
Summary
This discussion focuses on the Collective’s metagovernance strategy. It includes initiatives like the Path to Metagov and the Collective Feedback Commission, as well as programs such as the Chain Delegation Program. Metagovernance centers around designing how the Collective governs its governance system.
Season 6 : Mission Request Voting Guide
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
In Season 6 of the mission requests, delegates will vote on approving specific initiatives aligned with the Collective’s Intents. Missions are tightly scoped initiatives that can be completed within 12 months. Each mission proposal must receive a minimum number of “yes” votes equal to 51 % of the 30 % quorum to be approved. Delegates will rank mission requests based on the number of “yes” votes they receive, and the top-ranked requests within the approved budget will be accepted in rank order until the intent budget is fully allocated. Delegates can cast votes based on their full voting power, and should prioritize missions that they believe deserve to move forward. Voting on mission requests will take place in Voting Cycle # 24 , with the Grants Council evaluating and approving grants for the selected initiatives. It’s important that mission requests describe start-to-finish initiatives, not ongoing services, and should not rely on Foundation action or propose metagovernance changes.
Season 6 : Mission Request Creation Guide
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
The document outlines the guidelines for creating and submitting Mission Requests for Season 6 to achieve the Collective’s Intents. Missions are specific initiatives aligned with the Intents. Only Feedback Commission and Grants Council members can create Mission Requests. Requests should be tightly scoped, completed within 12 months, and not rely on ongoing services. Requests are aligned with specific Intents, must outline deliverables, impact measures, and be approved by Token House. Requests for Mission grants must be submitted by July 10 th, with drafts encouraged for feedback. The process aims to prioritize work and incentivize execution within the DAO community.
Season 6 : Anticapture Commission Amendment
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
The discussion focuses on amendments to the Anticapture Commission Charter for Season 6 of the governance structure. The Commission aims to prevent one stakeholder or group from capturing the Token House, serving tokenholders. Proposed changes include refining membership criteria, voting requirements, and responsibilities. The Commission will alert the Citizens’ House of power imbalances, vote on proposals subject to veto, advocate for decentralization, and ensure transparency in governance. The amendments seek to streamline processes, enhance participation, and clarify expectations for members. The proposals will undergo a voting process in Special Voting Cycle # 23 a to determine their implementation.
Season 6 : Chain Delegation Program Amendment
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: system
Summary
A special thanks was extended to those who provided feedback on the amendments related to the Chain Delegation Program for Season 6 . The program was not utilized in Season 5 but is expected to be important moving forward. The amendment outlines criteria for OP Chains to be eligible for delegation, with different levels of delegation based on performance metrics. The program size is set at 20 M to support the initial OP Chains. Delegations will be reassessed per season, with caps in place based on votable supply. OP Chains need to meet specific expectations to participate, with a focus on governance engagement. The proposed amendments will be put to a vote, ensuring the program continues through Season 6 .
Grant Council - Retrospective Season 5
Created: 2024 - 05 - 10
Author: Gonna.eth
Summary
The Season 5 Grants Council retrospective team has reviewed and achieved several benchmark milestones and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). They successfully reviewed over 95 % of mission requests, maintained a finalist rate below 30 %, and processed over 300 proposals. The team also received positive NPS scores and established a Milestone Hub for project tracking. The impact assessment highlighted the team’s dedication and resilience despite challenges. Adjustments to internal operating procedures and proposed changes to the charter were suggested to enhance efficiency and fairness in the review process. Recommendations for the next season include refining processes, enhancing transparency, and reviewing budget allotments mid-season for Token House voting. The Grants Council aims to improve operations while upholding transparency, efficiency, and accountability within the Optimism Collective.
The new forum Layout
Created: 2024 - 05 - 11
Author: @yummybillasd
Summary
The discussion focused on praising the user-friendly, structured, and organized nature of the conversation or platform being utilized. The user expressed gratitude for the efficiency and ease of navigating the discussion.
Season 6 : Chain Delegation Program Amended
Created: 2024 - 05 - 12
Author: system
Summary
In Season 6 , an amended version of the Chain Delegation Program was introduced, which is set to be the authoritative version if approved. The program focuses on onboarding approximately 15 OP Chains to participate actively in Optimism’s governance. The criteria for OP Chain qualification includes being in the Superchain Registry, contributing revenue back to the Collective, generating over 1 ETH/month in sequencer revenue, and reaching 1 M in transaction volume for two consecutive months. Standard Blockspace operating chains are eligible for additional delegation. OP Chains must adhere to voting participation rates, set delegate statements, and have a point of contact for delegation. Delegations will be capped at 9 % of the votable supply, and any violations of the Optimist Expectations will result in removal from the Chain Delegation Program.
Season 6 : Anticapture Commission Amended
Created: 2024 - 05 - 12
Author: system
Summary
Season 6 brings an amended version of the Anticapture Commission Charter introduced in Season 5 , aiming to prevent the capture of Token House by any single stakeholder or group. The Commission’s goals include providing alerts on stakeholder power imbalances, voting on proposals subject to Citizens’ House veto, and advocating for decentralization and transparency. The Commission is comprised of high impact delegates based on certain criteria and members are expected to fulfill responsibilities like voting on ACC votes, attending meetings, and contributing to reports. The Commission Lead plays a crucial role in organizing meetings, coordinating votes, and authoring reports for the Citizens’ House.
Season 6 : Reflection Period Guide
Created: 2024 - 05 - 12
Author: system
Summary
For Season 6 , there is a structured timeline for various activities related to governance and decision-making within the community. It starts with a reflection period for all voters to read and review retrospectives from the previous season. Different topics are covered for education, including the Collective Reward Framework and details about Missions and Superchain Governance in Season 6 .
There’s a deadline for those interested in running for a leadership role to post proposals and seek approvals from top 100 delegates. Proposals cover areas such as operating budgets, protocol upgrades, and council renewals. Delegates have a specific period to approve proposals before they move to the voting phase in the Token House.
After the Token House votes on various proposals, there’s a Citizens House Veto Period and then nominations open for running as a representative. Candidate assessments and reading follow, leading up to the Special Voting Cycle where Token House votes and Citizens House ratifies decisions.
The timeline extends to include voting cycles and elections for representative structures like the Grants Council, Developer Advisory Board, and Code of Conduct Council. Each phase has specific actions and deadlines, leading to the start of Season 6 on June 27 th. The season includes voting cycles, grant applications, and follows a public governance calendar for continued participation and decision-making.
gm Optimism Collective :red_circle: :sparkles: Last week was super active on forum. 45 posts were…
gm Optimism Collective :red_circle: :sparkles: Last week was super active on forum. 45 posts were made, 19 from the community, and 26 made by the system account. daospace is a DAO discovery platform that aggregates contributions across different DAOs. We will be providing weekly Automated AI Summaries to help reduce information overload, and so that all members can stay up to date on forum activity within the DAO. Below is a summary of every topic made within the OP Governance Forum from last week. Feel free to leave us feedback in the comments below. You can get in touch with the daospace team on X (Twitter) , or reach out to the founders directly on X as well: Jaris James & Sixty 1 DeVouch (Decentralized Vouching with Attestations) - Mission Grant - Project Updates Created: 2024 - 05 - 06 Author: @mitch Summary DeVouch is introducing a solution to the challenge of identifying trustworthy projects in the ecosystem by leveraging attestations. The platform will aggregate projects from various funding platforms into a filterable list where users can endorse projects or flag them as suspicious. Attestations come from specific groups like Optimism Badgeholders or Gitcoin Passport Scores, helping users make informed decisions about project integrity. The project is in the design and coding phase, aiming to provide easy-to-use APIs for integration into analytics tools and grant platforms. The initiative also plans to develop a user-friendly front-end interface and aims to streamline external API endpoints and standard schemas for broader ecosystem adoption. Code of Conduct Council - Retrospective Season 5 Created: 2024 - 05 - 06 Author: CoCCouncil Summary The Season 5 Retrospective discussed by the collective focused on achieving milestones set in the Budget Proposal and Charter at the start of the season. The team made progress in managing conflicts, reducing governance overhead, and enhancing community engagement. They provided impactful support and communication, managed conflicts effectively, and worked towards decentralization of governance. Suggestions included incentivizing closer community involvement, simplifying internal procedures, adjusting the charter to handle various behavioral issues, and expanding innovative roles for the next season. The team recommended parallelization of Alternative Dispute Resolution processes and continuing their operations with a focus on improving conflict management within the Optimism ecosystem. Where it’s better to sell/buy $OP Created: 2024 - 05 - 06 Author: @Ethplorer.eth Summary The discussion focused on whether it matters where to buy or sell $OP for better rates, assuming that everyone follows the same strategy. People considered factors such as liquidity, Optimism blockchain activity, visibility, and popularization of $OP. The options presented included buying and selling on the Optimism blockchain, buying on Optimism and selling outside on another exchange, buying outside and selling on Optimism, buying and selling outside, or the idea that it doesn’t matter. Participants were asked to vote on their preferred option. [Discussion] On-chain Builders Delivering Metrics Data Created: 2024 - 05 - 07 Author: @pfedprog Summary Retro Funding 4 is launching to reward on-chain builders who have deployed contracts to the Superchain and contributed to the success of Optimism. The program aims to expand the network’s impact by rewarding those who have increased blockspace demand and brought value to the Collective. Eligible builders need to meet certain criteria and submit their applications before June 6 th, 2024 . Difficulty lies in accurately presenting results within specified metrics, but tools like EVM Smart Contract Explorer are being used to assist in quickly obtaining smart contract data. Feedback from the community is sought on how to verify eligibility for builders and what additional impactful metrics beyond the requested ones could be considered. The use of APIs like Blockscout is mentioned to access blockchain data. What is the exact amount of Badgeholders in the Citizen House? Created: 2024 - 05 - 08 Author: @ 0 xR Summary The user is seeking help to locate information about the number of citizens in the Citizen House but has been unable to find it in places like Agora, Dune, and Curia. They are asking the optimistic community for assistance. Cycle 22 Final Grants roundup Created: 2024 - 05 - 08 Author: Gonna.eth Summary In Season 5 , the Grants Program faced significant challenges and underwent a stress test, particularly with the Mission Requests Program. Despite the hurdles, the Grants Council demonstrated adaptability and resilience, reviewing a remarkable surge in applications with efficiency. Season 5 saw a 73 . 2 % growth in applications compared to the previous season, receiving a total of 530 Mission Request applications. The Council adapted well to changes, including handling a transition in the Builders Subcommittee. Subcommittees refined Rubrics tailored to each intent, with 8 Rubrics applied to 27 Mission Requests. The review process for Season 5 has concluded, and a detailed list of 74 Finalists for Cycle 22 has been provided. The Finalists represent grants totaling approximately 4 . 56 M OP, with the total recommended grants for Season 5 amounting to around 7 . 12 M OP. There was a proposal to change the use of unused rewards, and the Council expects a surplus of 1 . 87 M OP to be returned to the Gov Fund. The Council aims to make Optimism the top destination for builders and hopes their efforts will contribute to the community’s goals. Finalists have been asked to stay tuned for further instructions regarding KYC details. Stay optimistic! Season 6 : Grants Council Operating Budget Created: 2024 - 05 - 08 Author: system Summary In Season 6 , the Grants Council, a persistent council within the Collective, will need to propose an operating budget and charter for the season. Prospective leads can submit budget proposals by May 22 nd, with the highest-voted proposal being approved. The council will be responsible for proposing Mission Requests under Intent # 3 and processing violations of grant policies. The council will need to be held accountable to governance mechanisms. Governance will measure the council’s impact through various KPIs related to builder experience and grant performance. Delegates will vote on the approved budget and elect the leadership roles within the council. Retro Funding 4 : Deliberative process on the definition of profit Created: 2024 - 05 - 08 Author: system Summary In Optimism’s Retroactive Public Goods Funding (Retro Funding), a shift towards a collective definition of profit is being introduced in Retro Funding 4 . This move aims to streamline the calculation process and enhance predictability for contributors. Instead of individual assessments, a collective definition of profit will be determined through a deliberative process and subsequently ratified by the Citizens’ House. This definition will be applied universally to all projects, simplifying the voting process and reducing voting complexity for badgeholders. The aim is to foster a more productive and sustainable ecosystem by rewarding positive impact on the collective. Through a deliberative process set up for Retro Funding 4 , a randomly sampled subset of 50 citizens will deliberate on the definition of profit, guided by facilitated sessions and balanced information. The outcomes of this deliberation will influence the Retro Funding rewards allocated to projects, creating a more streamlined and predictable process for contributors. Foundation S 6 AMA / Token House Call will be [Tuesday, May 14 th @ 11 : 00 PT / 14 : 00 ET / 18 : 00 GMT / 19 : 00 CET] Created: 2024 - 05 - 08 Author: @Michael Summary The Token House Community Call is scheduled for next Tuesday and will feature a Season 6 AMA with @ lavande and the Foundation, as well as a surprise talk from @ ben-chain. The call will be held on Google Meet, and new delegates interested in Optimism Governance can DM Michael for introductions. The event promises to be an informative and engaging session. Developer Advisory Board - Retrospective Season 5 Created: 2024 - 05 - 08 Author: @zachobront Summary The Budget Proposal and Charter set specific milestones and KPIs for the season, including assessing and approving Delegate Mission Requests, aiding the Grants Council, and advising on technical milestones. Progress has been made on all these goals, with some completed and others expanded in scope. The Developer Advisory Board’s outputs effectively supported the intended purpose by providing guidance on Delegate Mission Requests and applications, influencing final decisions positively. Proposed changes to Internal Operating Procedures (IOPs) include integrating DAB feedback earlier in the process and implementing more efficient feedback assignment methods. No suggested adjustments to the Charter were made, as it was deemed appropriate. Potential expansion into other areas for technical insight was welcomed. The team’s mandate was considered appropriate, with a suggestion to possibly expand into other areas of the Optimism ecosystem to provide even more value in the future. About the Feedback category Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: maxwell Summary This category is designed for users to provide feedback on various topics and ask questions in order to receive constructive criticism or opinions from others. Whether it’s feedback on a project, a product, a service, or any other area that requires input, users can seek advice and suggestions from the community here. The goal is to help individuals improve and make informed decisions based on the feedback they receive. About the Elected Representatives category Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: maxwell Summary The discussion focuses on representing structures within the Optimism Collective that include boards, commissions, and councils made up of elected representatives. These bodies form part of the organizational framework of the collective. Season 6 : Developer Advisory Board Renewal Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: system Summary Delegates are being asked to vote on approving a Developer Advisory Board (DAB) Operating Budget for Season 6 . The proposed budget with the highest proportion of “Yes” votes will be approved, effectively electing the Lead who authored the budget. If approved, other DAB members will be elected, ensuring at least one representative of OP Labs or other Core Devs is on the Board. The DAB will play a key role in technical decision-making within the Collective, reviewing protocol upgrades, advising the Grants Council on technical grants and milestones, and more. Delegates have until May 22 nd to submit proposal drafts for the DAB Operating Budget. Performance metrics are suggested for measuring the DAB’s impact, and rewards are subject to a KYC process. Delegates will vote on the DAB Operating Budget in the upcoming Special Voting Cycle # 23 a. Season 6 : Code of Conduct Council Renewal 1 Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: system Summary In Season 6 , the discussion revolves around renewing the Code of Conduct Council (CoCC) within the Collective. The Council was initially created in Season 5 to experiment with decentralized enforcement of the Code of Conduct. Over time, the scope of the CoCC has been adjusted, with a current proposal limiting its responsibilities to enforcing the Rules of Engagement across all Optimism-hosted platforms. Delegates have the opportunity to vote on approving a Code of Conduct Council Operating Budget, which will also elect a Lead to oversee the Council. If the budget is not approved, the supportNERDs will continue to enforce the Rules of Engagement. Proposals for the Council Operating Budget are due by a specific deadline, and key metrics for assessing the Council’s impact are provided. Delegates play a crucial role in deciding the future of the Code of Conduct Council through their voting decisions. Season 6 : Code of Conduct Rescoping # 2 Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: system Summary A detailed overview of the evolution of the Code of Conduct (CoC) within the Token House and Citizens’ House is outlined. Various iterations and experiments with governance enforcement mechanisms, such as the creation of a Council, have been discussed. The focus has been on reducing governance overhead while ensuring accountability. The updates include shifting grant-related violations enforcement to the Grants Council, promoting self-dealing policies via incentive design and free market delegation, and establishing various voting and metric-based controls. The discussion also addresses the continued enforcement of Rules of Engagement and the potential role of a Code of Conduct Council for future enforcement. The decentralization of accountability through mediation, delegation, grants oversight, expectation setting, and voting design is emphasized. The changes are slated for Season 6 and flexible for reassessment based on feedback and outcomes. Appreciation is extended to the Code of Conduct Council for their contributions towards innovative solutions. Season 5 : Missions v 2 Retrospective Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: system Summary The discussion provides a retrospective on Season 5 : Mission Requests, focusing on feedback from various stakeholders to inform the redesign of Mission Requests for v 2 . 5 . The retrospective delves into key areas such as drafting, sponsoring, approving, voting, applying to, and selecting Mission Applications. Changes to streamline the process, improve clarity, and reduce downtime have been made based on Season 5 experiences. Mission Requests now involve fewer delegates drafting them, sponsorship by eligible delegates, and the elimination of the delegate approval process for Season 6 . The voting process has been refined to address under-allocations and improve delegate experience. Application cycles have been adjusted to provide grants more frequently, addressing past issues of application processing delays. The retrospective highlights achievements, challenges, and areas for improvement, with Season 5 feedback and insights shaping the design of Missions v 2 . 5 . Proposing a New Metric: Pairwise Community Signaling in Retro Funding 4 Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: @Zeptimus Summary Pairwise is introducing a new version focused on making signaling RetroPGF accessible to the Optimism Community. The open-source voting dapp streamlines community signaling by allowing users to choose between two options and aggregates their choices into quantifiable results. The intention is to amplify community voices, increase project discovery, and network effects. Pairwise aims to engage token holders, delegates, RetroPGF recipients, and badgeholders in community signaling. The platform offers a user-friendly experience, minimizes the cost and cognitive burden of voting, and converts subjective inputs into measurable outputs. To encourage engagement, the new version includes features like mobile optimization, voter feedback, Tinder-style filtering, sound effects, and pseudonymous account abstraction. Instead of allocating tokens, users will rank projects to streamline the voting process. Challenges to overcome include tight timelines and engagement levels, with a marketing campaign planned to maximize participation. Four metrics are proposed for different stakeholder groups, and voting power distribution details are provided. The Pairwise ranking will aggregate input from Badgeholders, Recipients, Delegates, and Holders, with engagement requirements for each group to qualify as a metric for voting. The app’s timing will align with the project’s finalization, and reward distribution is structured to promote stakeholder engagement. An anti-gaming strategy will ensure the integrity of the voting process, and transparency will be maintained throughout the reward calculation and distribution steps. The community is encouraged to share feedback to shape this experiment collectively, with a prototype set to launch internally on May 15 . Season 6 : Intents Ratification Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: system Summary The discussion revolved around the upcoming Season 6 of the Optimism Collective, where significant changes are being made to the setting of Intents and budgets. The Foundation will now propose all Intents, aiming for data-driven decisions, with the Token House ratifying them. Season 6 focuses on decentralization progress, expanding the Superchain with new chains, and growing application developers on the Superchain. Each Intent has specific targets, metrics, and areas of support, with different funding sources allocated for their realization. The roles of the Foundation, core development teams, and various funds like Retro Funding and Gov Fund were discussed in detail to support these Intents effectively. Season 5 : Retro Governance Participation Rewards Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: system Summary In Season 5 , there was a focus on strategic work through Missions v 2 and decentralization efforts like the establishment of the Security Council and Anticapture Commission. A Developer Advisory Board and Code of Conduct Council were also experimented with. The Citizens’ House rewarded participants with OP for their contributions, leading towards social and technological decentralization. Retroactive rewards were given to governance participants meeting specific criteria such as voting participation, involvement in the Anticapture Commission, sponsoring approved Mission Requests, and contributing to reports. All rewards are subject to a KYC process and allocated from the Ecosystem Fund. The highest impact contributions aligned with Collective Intents were rewarded following the Collective Rewards Framework. Season 6 : Missions v 2 . 5 1 Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: system Summary Huge appreciation is extended to several individuals for reviewing and providing feedback on scope changes for the Feedback Commission. Season 6 ’s Mission process remains consistent with some adjustments to streamline the process for delegates and grant applicants based on feedback. The changes include allowing the Feedback Commission, Grants Council, and Growth Team to propose Mission Requests, reducing the involvement of Top 100 delegates in drafting requests, and enabling sponsorship of Mission Requests by any member of the Feedback Commission or Grants Council. The final approval of Mission Requests will still be decided by the Token House, and improvements will be made to the grant application process based on feedback from Season 5 . These modifications aim to enhance the experience for builders, optimize timelines, and align grant calendars with governance schedules. The adjustments are influenced by insights gathered from various stakeholders and will be treated as an ongoing experiment, with room for further refinements based on feedback collected during the process. Season 6 : Suggested Mission Requests Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: system Summary The discussion revolves around the proposed Mission Requests for Season 6 , primarily focused on governance, decentralization, and developer growth within the Optimism ecosystem. The suggested Mission Requests aim to align efforts with specific goals and metrics, with a focus on critical DAO infrastructure, research on governance parameters, driving delegation, and engaging developers across different sectors like DeFi, stablecoins, gaming, AI/ML applications, and more. The allocation of budgets, success metrics, and specific guidelines for OP Chains to run their grants programs under Intent 3 B are also detailed. Collaboration between various bodies within the ecosystem is emphasized to ensure coherence and effectiveness in achieving the outlined objectives. Anticapture Commission - Retrospective Season 5 Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: @ACC Summary The discussion covers various aspects of the Anticapture Commission’s performance during Season 5 . Progress towards set goals like increasing votable supply and defining standards for top delegates was analyzed, noting successes and areas for improvement. Impact assessment reveals the team’s support of their defined Intent, with a focus on decentralization and transparency. Suggestions included adjustments to Internal Operating Procedures like voting windows, notification definitions, and call length. Proposed Charter adjustments involved clarifying member responsibilities and simplifying mid-season membership recalculations. Recommendations for next season involved enhancing collaboration with OP chains and adapting efforts as needed, emphasizing the Commission’s growing relevance. Gratitude was expressed to all involved parties for their contributions and support throughout the season. Audit Requests S 5 final roundup 1 Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: Gonna.eth Summary The discussion highlighted the accomplishments of @jackanorak during Season 5 and recommended him for the retroPGF program due to his significant contributions. The second batch of projects selected for RFG- 3 , focusing on Smart Contract Auditing Services, were announced after a thorough evaluation. The discussion also covered the approval of new Audit Providers for the audit program in Season 5 and shared key learnings for improving the process, including the need for a subcommittee, revising the rubric, establishing a public platform for projects, holding weekly office hours, and reforming the audits form. Overall, the audit election process was deemed successful, with emphasis placed on evaluating the effectiveness of the program through milestones and metrics for future growth and security within the ecosystem. Optimism Fractal Season 3 Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: @Rosmari Summary Join the Optimism Fractal Season 3 ’s inaugural event featuring a Respect Game followed by a planning session introducing a proposal for a social coordination game named Cagendas. This game allows participants to vote on discussion topics for the weekly sessions held in the new Optimism Town Hall. The proposal suggests transitioning from the existing Planning Sessions to these Town Hall events without extending the total event time. Check out the details in the introductory post, Snapshot proposal, and join the Zoom room for the event to show your support! About the Collective Strategy category Created: 2024 - 05 - 09 Author: maxwell Summary This discussion pertains to collective strategy and coordination regarding intentions and roadmaps. Participants are likely sharing ideas, plans, and approaches to align efforts and achieve common goals. Delegate Resignation Process Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: maxwell Summary Delegates are key players in the Collective’s operations and are encouraged to experiment and iterate continuously. For those needing to resign temporarily, a specific process is outlined to minimize disruption. Delegates are advised to communicate their resignation period, reasons, and potential future involvement within the Collective. Large delegates are urged to guide their delegators in reallocating their tokens while they’re away. The use of advanced delegation is proposed for short-term absences, with broader implementation subject to contract modifications. Long-term resignation plans should be shared across platforms and with key members for awareness. Elected or appointed positions require a replacement to be appointed and communicated in advance. More details on the resignation process for Citizens will be shared prior to Season 6 . Season 6 : Collective Reward Framework Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary The discussion highlighted the Collective Rewards Framework for Season 6 , designed to provide a consistent approach to rewarding contributions within the community. The framework aims to transition the decision-making process to the community, introducing guidelines for setting rewards, evolving with the introduction of a Budget Board in Season 7 . It stresses the importance of utilizing Retroactive Public Goods Funding for most governance operations in the long term. Impact Ratings are introduced as a guide for determining rewards based on the contributions’ impact. Various contribution types are outlined, each with specific reward structures. The emphasis is on output and impact over input, reflecting the community’s adaptive approach and commitment to governance token integrity. Elected representatives, contributors, governance participants, and service providers are all addressed in the framework, aiming to provide clarity and consistency in reward allocation. Season 6 : Guide to Season 6 Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary Members of the Feedback Commission provided input and feedback on Season 6 drafts, starting on June 27 th through December 11 th. Grant applications for Season 6 open every 3 weeks from July 18 th. The Season will focus on optimizing programs introduced in Season 5 and shifting governance control to the community. Intents, Collective Rewards Framework, Developer Advisory Board, Anticapture Commission, Code of Conduct, and other key aspects will see changes and refinements. The Season will also emphasize transparency and community feedback in decision-making processes, including the continuous transition of governance power to the community. The Season 6 Reflection Period Guide details the necessary activities. Additionally, changes will include transitions like introducing Blockspace Charters, the Security Council Election, and updates to Trust Tiers and the govNERDs program. Various amendments and renewals will shape the governance landscape for Season 6 .
Season 6 : Mission Application Guide Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary In Season 6…
Season 6 : Mission Application Guide Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary In Season 6 , teams can apply for Mission grants to execute specific initiatives outlined in Mission Requests by the Token House or Foundation. The Grants Council selects teams to fulfill these Requests. Each team must have a point of contact, and Trust Tiers determine the funding amount a team can request. Retro Funding may be available if a Mission grant generates additional impact. There are clear guidelines for applying for both Foundation and Token House Mission grants, which involve meeting deadlines, following templates, and providing progress updates. Grants are subject to policies and require KYC with the Foundation. Applicants are encouraged to understand the grant process and not assume additional Retro Funding. Applications for Season 6 Mission grants open on July 18 th, with deadlines provided on the public governance calendar. Season 6 Elections: Grants Council Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary The Season 6 Election for the Grants Council involves the election of Reviewers by the Token House through a Special Voting Cycle. Those interested in nominating themselves need to follow a specific template and submit their information by a set deadline. The Foundation will organize a town hall before the elections. There are strategic considerations for the expertise needed in Reviewers, such as knowledge of DeFi and Gaming. Approval voting will determine the elected Reviewers, allowing delegates to vote for multiple nominees. The voting mechanism may adjust based on the Council’s structure and number of candidates. Self-nominated candidates must commit to dedicating approximately 20 hours per week to reviewing grant applications and Council operations. Season 6 Nominations: Grants Council Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary Members are invited to submit their self-nominations for the Season 6 Grants Council, following the outlined template and process. All nominations must be posted on the dedicated thread by 19 : 00 GMT on Wednesday, June 5 th. Season 6 Nominations: Developer Advisory Board Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary Individuals are invited to nominate themselves for the Season 6 Developer Advisory Board by posting their nominations in a designated thread using a specific template by 19 : 00 GMT on June 5 th. Season 6 Nominations: Code of Conduct Council Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary Users are asked to post self-nominations for the Season 6 Code of Conduct Council on a specified thread by 19 : 00 GMT on a certain date, following a provided template and process. This is for individuals looking to participate in the council and uphold the community’s code of conduct. Season 6 Elections: Developer Advisory Board Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary The discussion revolves around the Season 6 Elections for the Developer Advisory Board within the Token House. The elections are happening during a Special Voting Cycle # 23 b from June 13 th to June 19 th at 19 : 00 GMT. The board members will be elected, except for at least one representative from OP Labs or other Core Devs, who will be appointed by the Foundation to maintain coherence with roadmaps. Self-nominations for board membership need to be submitted by June 5 th. The potential criteria for board members include expertise in the Optimism and/or Ethereum ecosystem, understanding of protocol upgrades, coding skills, time dedication, and experiences in security, auditing, grant evaluations, and technical representation across various layers of the stack. For delegates, there will be a review through approval voting in Special Voting Cycle # 23 b. Delegates can vote for as many nominees as they choose, including themselves, but should also cast votes for other elected positions. The final election process may vary based on the Council’s structure and the number of candidates. Season 6 Elections: Code of Conduct Council Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary Season 6 of the Optimism ecosystem features the elections for the Code of Conduct Council, with members being elected by the Token House in a special voting cycle. Nominees must fill out a template by a specified date and have completed conflict resolution training by the start of the season. Representatives are restricted to one elected position per season, with no term limits currently in place. For delegates, Code of Conduct Council members will be elected through approval voting in the special voting cycle. Delegates can vote for multiple nominees with equal voting power, with those receiving the highest percentage of approval votes being elected to the Council. The process allows delegates to vote for themselves as long as they also cast votes for the remaining open positions. The voting mechanism may be adjusted based on the Council structure and number of candidates. About the Governance Design category Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: maxwell Summary This discussion focuses on the Collective’s metagovernance strategy. It includes initiatives like the Path to Metagov and the Collective Feedback Commission, as well as programs such as the Chain Delegation Program. Metagovernance centers around designing how the Collective governs its governance system. Season 6 : Mission Request Voting Guide Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary In Season 6 of the mission requests, delegates will vote on approving specific initiatives aligned with the Collective’s Intents. Missions are tightly scoped initiatives that can be completed within 12 months. Each mission proposal must receive a minimum number of “yes” votes equal to 51 % of the 30 % quorum to be approved. Delegates will rank mission requests based on the number of “yes” votes they receive, and the top-ranked requests within the approved budget will be accepted in rank order until the intent budget is fully allocated. Delegates can cast votes based on their full voting power, and should prioritize missions that they believe deserve to move forward. Voting on mission requests will take place in Voting Cycle # 24 , with the Grants Council evaluating and approving grants for the selected initiatives. It’s important that mission requests describe start-to-finish initiatives, not ongoing services, and should not rely on Foundation action or propose metagovernance changes. Season 6 : Mission Request Creation Guide Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary The document outlines the guidelines for creating and submitting Mission Requests for Season 6 to achieve the Collective’s Intents. Missions are specific initiatives aligned with the Intents. Only Feedback Commission and Grants Council members can create Mission Requests. Requests should be tightly scoped, completed within 12 months, and not rely on ongoing services. Requests are aligned with specific Intents, must outline deliverables, impact measures, and be approved by Token House. Requests for Mission grants must be submitted by July 10 th, with drafts encouraged for feedback. The process aims to prioritize work and incentivize execution within the DAO community. Season 6 : Anticapture Commission Amendment Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary The discussion focuses on amendments to the Anticapture Commission Charter for Season 6 of the governance structure. The Commission aims to prevent one stakeholder or group from capturing the Token House, serving tokenholders. Proposed changes include refining membership criteria, voting requirements, and responsibilities. The Commission will alert the Citizens’ House of power imbalances, vote on proposals subject to veto, advocate for decentralization, and ensure transparency in governance. The amendments seek to streamline processes, enhance participation, and clarify expectations for members. The proposals will undergo a voting process in Special Voting Cycle # 23 a to determine their implementation. Season 6 : Chain Delegation Program Amendment Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: system Summary A special thanks was extended to those who provided feedback on the amendments related to the Chain Delegation Program for Season 6 . The program was not utilized in Season 5 but is expected to be important moving forward. The amendment outlines criteria for OP Chains to be eligible for delegation, with different levels of delegation based on performance metrics. The program size is set at 20 M to support the initial OP Chains. Delegations will be reassessed per season, with caps in place based on votable supply. OP Chains need to meet specific expectations to participate, with a focus on governance engagement. The proposed amendments will be put to a vote, ensuring the program continues through Season 6 . Grant Council - Retrospective Season 5 Created: 2024 - 05 - 10 Author: Gonna.eth Summary The Season 5 Grants Council retrospective team has reviewed and achieved several benchmark milestones and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). They successfully reviewed over 95 % of mission requests, maintained a finalist rate below 30 %, and processed over 300 proposals. The team also received positive NPS scores and established a Milestone Hub for project tracking. The impact assessment highlighted the team’s dedication and resilience despite challenges. Adjustments to internal operating procedures and proposed changes to the charter were suggested to enhance efficiency and fairness in the review process. Recommendations for the next season include refining processes, enhancing transparency, and reviewing budget allotments mid-season for Token House voting. The Grants Council aims to improve operations while upholding transparency, efficiency, and accountability within the Optimism Collective. The new forum Layout Created: 2024 - 05 - 11 Author: @yummybillasd Summary The discussion focused on praising the user-friendly, structured, and organized nature of the conversation or platform being utilized. The user expressed gratitude for the efficiency and ease of navigating the discussion. Season 6 : Chain Delegation Program Amended Created: 2024 - 05 - 12 Author: system Summary In Season 6 , an amended version of the Chain Delegation Program was introduced, which is set to be the authoritative version if approved. The program focuses on onboarding approximately 15 OP Chains to participate actively in Optimism’s governance. The criteria for OP Chain qualification includes being in the Superchain Registry, contributing revenue back to the Collective, generating over 1 ETH/month in sequencer revenue, and reaching 1 M in transaction volume for two consecutive months. Standard Blockspace operating chains are eligible for additional delegation. OP Chains must adhere to voting participation rates, set delegate statements, and have a point of contact for delegation. Delegations will be capped at 9 % of the votable supply, and any violations of the Optimist Expectations will result in removal from the Chain Delegation Program. Season 6 : Anticapture Commission Amended Created: 2024 - 05 - 12 Author: system Summary Season 6 brings an amended version of the Anticapture Commission Charter introduced in Season 5 , aiming to prevent the capture of Token House by any single stakeholder or group. The Commission’s goals include providing alerts on stakeholder power imbalances, voting on proposals subject to Citizens’ House veto, and advocating for decentralization and transparency. The Commission is comprised of high impact delegates based on certain criteria and members are expected to fulfill responsibilities like voting on ACC votes, attending meetings, and contributing to reports. The Commission Lead plays a crucial role in organizing meetings, coordinating votes, and authoring reports for the Citizens’ House. Season 6 : Reflection Period Guide 1 Created: 2024 - 05 - 12 Author: system Summary For Season 6 , there is a structured timeline for various activities related to governance and decision-making within the community. It starts with a reflection period for all voters to read and review retrospectives from the previous season. Different topics are covered for education, including the Collective Reward Framework and details about Missions and Superchain Governance in Season 6 . There’s a deadline for those interested in running for a leadership role to post proposals and seek approvals from top 100 delegates. Proposals cover areas such as operating budgets, protocol upgrades, and council renewals. Delegates have a specific period to approve proposals before they move to the voting phase in the Token House. After the Token House votes on various proposals, there’s a Citizens House Veto Period and then nominations open for running as a representative. Candidate assessments and reading follow, leading up to the Special Voting Cycle where Token House votes and Citizens House ratifies decisions. The timeline extends to include voting cycles and elections for representative structures like the Grants Council, Developer Advisory Board, and Code of Conduct Council. Each phase has specific actions and deadlines, leading to the start of Season 6 on June 27 th. The season includes voting cycles, grant applications, and follows a public governance calendar for continued participation and decision-making.
