Optimism post RPGF analysis

Thanatos - No Role
May 23, 2024, 5:24 a.m.

OVERVIEW I’m a founding member at PYOR 4 and since Optimism’s recent round of on-chain Retroactive Public Goods Funding (RPGF) applications ended the first week of May, we analyzed the performance of previous RPGF receivers in the DeFi space, focusing on core fundamental on-chain metrics. This analysis is an Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) of the performance of these receivers. Our end objective with this analysis is – to empower the Optimism Governance to focus on recipients that bring in a net positive outcome to the Optimism Superchain. As these are RPGF, these protocols weren’t expected to meet any criteria post-grant. From the datasets by Opensource Observer, we filtered 11 protocols, with DeFi presence, that received the January RPGF drop: Aerodrome Hop Protocol Kromatika Kwenta Lyra Finance Sonne Finance Sushi Synapse Synthetix Velodrome Yearn METHODOLOGY For on-chain metrics, we defined the following: • TVL - Total Value locked in USD terms in the smart contracts controlled by the protocol • Fees - Fees generated via payment from users for the services provided • Volumes - DEX or Bridge volume of the respective protocol, if any. • User Activity - New and Active wallets interacting with the contracts of a protocol. For the metrics that are not continuous, i.e. fees, volumes, and user activity, a smoothing operation is performed with a 5 -day moving average. This is performed to remove volatility spikes and show trends better. For the metrics above: Before and After RPGF: A self-reflection analysis of each protocol was performed by comparing the data points before and after January 1 st, 2024 (the start of RPGF distribution). This is done to see if there is potential growth in the protocol. This is quantified and made comparable by converting raw values into percentages, to the value on the date of RPGF distribution Category-wise: Protocols are bucketed into their respective sectors, compared to see how a protocol performed with its peers Normalization of Values: The growth data points are further normalized by the RPGF value distributed to find the protocols with the best bang for the buck Benchmark for DEXs: For DEXes, Uniswap is chosen as a control and compared to with, to see if the growth can be correlated to RPGF Benchmark for protocols: The TVL of all protocols is compared to the TVL of Optimism and Base, to gauge the performance of the protocols. INSIGHTS [ 1 ] The biggest growth was seen in Aerodrome across – TVL, fees, and DEX volume: TVL: Grew by 3 x Fees: Grew by 30 x DEX Volume: Grew by 13 x (for comparison, Uniswap’s volume grew by 5 x in the time) 1280 × 720 99 . 3 KB [ 2 ] SushiSwap saw an initial dip in all metrics, before a late revival. Its 7 x fee growth is second only to Aerodrome, while TVL only doubled. 1280 × 720 108 KB [ 3 ] Yield protocols like – YearnFinance and Sonne Finance fared poorly during the incentive period. Yearn’s TVL fell by 5 . 6 % Sonne’s TVL fell by 13 . 5 % 1280 × 720 86 . 9 KB [ 4 ] Bridges fared well after February 2024 Hop’s deposit grew by over 10 x Synapse generated over 500 % more fees Both bridges analyzed had flattish TVL growth during the period (due to rising withdrawals) 1280 × 720 85 . 6 KB CONCLUSION The protocols that are well established – either in terms of popularity or in terms of the number of grants received – saw net neutral growth before and after RFGF allocation. However, the newer protocols, especially on OP Superchains like Base saw positive growth in fundamental metrics. We would love to hear feedback from the community and the foundation to help us execute a data-driven approach to make the on-chain RPGF program more robust. We will also be posting snippets from our research in the forum, like this. ABOUT PYOR PYOR is a blockchain analytics firm, specializing in measuring the business performance of protocols. We’re backed by Castle Island Ventures, Coinbase Ventures, Hash 3 , Balaji Srinivasan, and many more. We work with large institutional investors and protocols like Ribbit Capital, M 31 Capital, Tezos, Compound, ICP, Swell, QuickSwap, etc. Our team has extensive experience building in the crypto space and were CXOs at Coinswitch, India’s largest crypto exchange backed by a 16 z.

The post discusses an exploratory data analysis of the performance of various DeFi protocols that received Retroactive Public Goods Funding (RPGF) on Optimism Superchain. The analysis focuses on metrics such as Total Value Locked (TVL), fees generated, DEX volume, and user activity before and after receiving RPGF. Insights include the exceptional growth of Aerodrome, SushiSwap's recovery, and the struggles of yield protocols like YearnFinance and Sonne Finance. The analysis also notes the success of bridge protocols like Hop and Synapse. The post concludes that established protocols showed neutral growth, while newer ones exhibited positive fundamental metric growth. The post is presented by PYOR, a blockchain analytics firm, and invites feedback to enhance the on-chain RPGF program.

Likes: 0 Replies: 0

No likes yet.

No replies yet.
Thanatos - No Role
May 23, 2024, 5:24 a.m.

OVERVIEW I’m a founding member at PYOR and since Optimism’s recent round of on-chain Retroactive Pu… OVERVIEW I’m a founding member at PYOR and since Optimism’s recent round of on-chain Retroactive Public Goods Funding (RPGF) applications ended the first week of May, we analyzed the performance of previous RPGF receivers in the DeFi space, focusing on core fundamental on-chain metrics. This analysis is an Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) of the performance of these receivers. Our end objective with this analysis is – to empower the Optimism Governance to focus on recipients that bring in a net positive outcome to the Optimism Superchain. As these are RPGF, these protocols weren’t expected to meet any criteria post-grant. From the datasets by Opensource Observer, we filtered 11 protocols, with DeFi presence, that received the January RPGF drop: Aerodrome Hop Protocol Kromatika Kwenta Lyra Finance Sonne Finance Sushi Synapse Synthetix Velodrome Yearn METHODOLOGY For on-chain metrics, we defined the following: • TVL - Total Value locked in USD terms in the smart contracts controlled by the protocol • Fees - Fees generated via payment from users for the services provided • Volumes - DEX or Bridge volume of the respective protocol, if any. • User Activity - New and Active wallets interacting with the contracts of a protocol. For the metrics that are not continuous, i.e. fees, volumes, and user activity, a smoothing operation is performed with a 5 -day moving average. This is performed to remove volatility spikes and show trends better. For the metrics above: Before and After RPGF: A self-reflection analysis of each protocol was performed by comparing the data points before and after January 1 st, 2024 (the start of RPGF distribution). This is done to see if there is potential growth in the protocol. This is quantified and made comparable by converting raw values into percentages, to the value on the date of RPGF distribution Category-wise: Protocols are bucketed into their respective sectors, compared to see how a protocol performed with its peers Normalization of Values: The growth data points are further normalized by the RPGF value distributed to find the protocols with the best bang for the buck Benchmark for DEXs: For DEXes, Uniswap is chosen as a control and compared to with, to see if the growth can be correlated to RPGF Benchmark for protocols: The TVL of all protocols is compared to the TVL of Optimism and Base, to gauge the performance of the protocols. INSIGHTS [ 1 ] The biggest growth was seen in Aerodrome across – TVL, fees, and DEX volume: TVL: Grew by 3 x Fees: Grew by 30 x DEX Volume: Grew by 13 x (for comparison, Uniswap’s volume grew by 5 x in the time) 1280 × 720 99 . 3 KB [ 2 ] SushiSwap saw an initial dip in all metrics, before a late revival. Its 7 x fee growth is second only to Aerodrome, while TVL only doubled. 1280 × 720 108 KB [ 3 ] Yield protocols like – YearnFinance and Sonne Finance fared poorly during the incentive period. Yearn’s TVL fell by 5 . 6 % Sonne’s TVL fell by 13 . 5 % 1280 × 720 86 . 9 KB [ 4 ] Bridges fared well after February 2024 Hop’s deposit grew by over 10 x Synapse generated over 500 % more fees Both bridges analyzed had flattish TVL growth during the period (due to rising withdrawals) 1280 × 720 85 . 6 KB CONCLUSION The protocols that are well established – either in terms of popularity or in terms of the number of grants received – saw net neutral growth before and after RFGF allocation. However, the newer protocols, especially on OP Superchains like Base saw positive growth in fundamental metrics. We would love to hear feedback from the community and the foundation to help us execute a data-driven approach to make the on-chain RPGF program more robust. We will also be posting snippets from our research in the forum, like this. ABOUT PYOR PYOR is a blockchain analytics firm, specializing in measuring the business performance of protocols. We’re backed by Castle Island Ventures, Coinbase Ventures, Hash 3 , Balaji Srinivasan, and many more. We work with large institutional investors and protocols like Ribbit Capital, M 31 Capital, Tezos, Compound, ICP, Swell, QuickSwap, etc. Our team has extensive experience building in the crypto space and were CXOs at Coinswitch, India’s largest crypto exchange backed by a 16 z.

Likes: 0 Replies: 0

No likes yet.

No replies yet.
Thanatos - No Role
May 23, 2024, 9:24 a.m.

OVERVIEW I’m a founding member at PYOR and since Optimism’s recent round of on-chain Retroactive Pu… OVERVIEW I’m a founding member at PYOR and since Optimism’s recent round of on-chain Retroactive Public Goods Funding (RPGF) applications ended the first week of May, we analyzed the performance of previous RPGF receivers in the DeFi space, focusing on core fundamental on-chain metrics. This analysis is an Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) of the performance of these receivers. Our end objective with this analysis is – to empower the Optimism Governance to focus on recipients that bring in a net positive outcome to the Optimism Superchain. As these are RPGF, these protocols weren’t expected to meet any criteria post-grant. From the datasets by Opensource Observer, we filtered 11 protocols, with DeFi presence, that received the January RPGF drop: Aerodrome Hop Protocol Kromatika Kwenta Lyra Finance Sonne Finance Sushi Synapse Synthetix Velodrome Yearn METHODOLOGY For on-chain metrics, we defined the following: • TVL - Total Value locked in USD terms in the smart contracts controlled by the protocol • Fees - Fees generated via payment from users for the services provided • Volumes - DEX or Bridge volume of the respective protocol, if any. • User Activity - New and Active wallets interacting with the contracts of a protocol. For the metrics that are not continuous, i.e. fees, volumes, and user activity, a smoothing operation is performed with a 5 -day moving average. This is performed to remove volatility spikes and show trends better. For the metrics above: Before and After RPGF: A self-reflection analysis of each protocol was performed by comparing the data points before and after January 1 st, 2024 (the start of RPGF distribution). This is done to see if there is potential growth in the protocol. This is quantified and made comparable by converting raw values into percentages, to the value on the date of RPGF distribution Category-wise: Protocols are bucketed into their respective sectors, compared to see how a protocol performed with its peers Normalization of Values: The growth data points are further normalized by the RPGF value distributed to find the protocols with the best bang for the buck Benchmark for DEXs: For DEXes, Uniswap is chosen as a control and compared to with, to see if the growth can be correlated to RPGF Benchmark for protocols: The TVL of all protocols is compared to the TVL of Optimism and Base, to gauge the performance of the protocols. INSIGHTS [ 1 ] The biggest growth was seen in Aerodrome across – TVL, fees, and DEX volume: TVL: Grew by 3 x Fees: Grew by 30 x DEX Volume: Grew by 13 x (for comparison, Uniswap’s volume grew by 5 x in the time) 1280 × 720 99 . 3 KB [ 2 ] SushiSwap saw an initial dip in all metrics, before a late revival. Its 7 x fee growth is second only to Aerodrome, while TVL only doubled. 1280 × 720 108 KB [ 3 ] Yield protocols like – YearnFinance and Sonne Finance fared poorly during the incentive period. Yearn’s TVL fell by 5 . 6 % Sonne’s TVL fell by 13 . 5 % 1280 × 720 86 . 9 KB [ 4 ] Bridges fared well after February 2024 Hop’s deposit grew by over 10 x Synapse generated over 500 % more fees Both bridges analyzed had flattish TVL growth during the period (due to rising withdrawals) 1280 × 720 85 . 6 KB CONCLUSION The protocols that are well established – either in terms of popularity or in terms of the number of grants received – saw net neutral growth before and after RFGF allocation. However, the newer protocols, especially on OP Superchains like Base saw positive growth in fundamental metrics. We would love to hear feedback from the community and the foundation to help us execute a data-driven approach to make the on-chain RPGF program more robust. We will also be posting snippets from our research in the forum, like this. ABOUT PYOR PYOR is a blockchain analytics firm, specializing in measuring the business performance of protocols. We’re backed by Castle Island Ventures, Coinbase Ventures, Hash 3 , Balaji Srinivasan, and many more. We work with large institutional investors and protocols like Ribbit Capital, M 31 Capital, Tezos, Compound, ICP, Swell, QuickSwap, etc. Our team has extensive experience building in the crypto space and were CXOs at Coinswitch, India’s largest crypto exchange backed by a 16 z.

Likes: 0 Replies: 0

No likes yet.

No replies yet.